• Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    424
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 days ago

    Columbine kicked off an epidemic of school shootings because of the attention it got. Some people need a focus for their misery and I am not ashamed to say that I would rather see heartless corporate executives fear for their safety instead of school children gunned down as they hide in a closet. Just putting that out there.

    • ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      82
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 days ago

      Hello lonely young men with something to prove, have you seen how much positive attention Luigi got

    • Benjaben@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      74
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 days ago

      It really would be a strange kind of uniquely American poetry if our school shooting problem inverted itself into a megacorp CEO shooting solution.

      • CaptSneeze@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        58
        ·
        11 days ago

        If a few more CEOs gets off’d, they’ll ram gun control legislation through congress faster than Trump can wolf down a Big Mac.

        • Benjaben@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          23
          ·
          11 days ago

          Historically it’s been threats to the owner / controller class that have produced serious gun control legislation in the US, so you are probably right! But if you mean actual confiscation a la Australia, pretty sure that’s off the table here. Sincerely think it’d spark a war no matter who sincerely attempts it or why.

        • ToucheGoodSir@lemy.lol
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          11 days ago

          The cat is out of the bag, no? 3d printing guns is a bit of a Pandoras box in regards to gun control. Especially in America where it has been legal for so long

          • unphazed@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            11 days ago

            Federally legal. I didn’t realize it but like 14 states outlaw them and others have prohibitions on parts of them. Honestly, I’m impressed it didn’t break. The idea of making one makes me nervous over safety. I haven’t even been brave enough to print a stock or foreguard simply out of concern. I also don’t trust aluminum casings (if a shell splits it’s likely damaging the barrel or receiver).

        • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          11 days ago

          A papercut that draws blue blood is a bigger issue to these freaks than a river of poor corpses.

        • Thrashy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          10 days ago

          Given that the guy used a (partially) 3D-printed gun, I just can’t fucking wait to see how the overbroad knee-jerk restrictions are going to impact the hobbyist maker space.

        • ryedaft@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 days ago

          I think they said that Luigi had a ghost gun, partially 3D printed? Of course he didn’t make the bullets so maybe that’ll matter.

          • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 days ago

            That would be quite a lot of gun control, especially for the US. Even in the UK you can buy ammo, I’m not sure why because your certainly not allowed a gun.

      • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        21
        ·
        11 days ago

        Only in America. Where there’s guns, there’s accidental death.

        I say ban the guns so the vigilantes need to use cricket bats. Sell the surveillance tapes for PPV.

    • demizerone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 days ago

      In this regard, all the media attention might be a good thing. I haven’t seen this much coverage since that runaway bride horse shit 15 years ago.

  • JigglySackles@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    243
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 days ago

    This is why you don’t snitch. The powers that be don’t care about you, have no intention to do right by you, and will actively look for ways to avoid you after they are done with you.

        • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 days ago

          The original is delay, deny, defend.

          The one that was on the cartridge casing when the CEO was terminated was, delay, deny, depose.

          The act of deposing a person, by one definition is to “remove from office suddenly and forcefully”

          IMO, that’s the meaning behind the use of “depose” here.

          There’s also legal depositions which are a very different thing entirely. From what I’ve heard, Luigi had a lot of experience with delay and deny. I dunno how much of what I’ve heard is true, and how much is just a game of telephone gone wrong.

            • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              10 days ago

              The problem is that the first reports of what was written on the casings was wrong, and later corrections are mixed in with the original misreported text.

              So there’s a lot of misunderstandings about what they said.

              I’m not saying my information is 100% accurate; but I’m not willing to wade through the neverending sea of news articles that care more about clicks than accuracy to figure it out.

              In any case, good luck and have a good day!

    • unphazed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 days ago

      I always wondered about WitSec. How long does the protection last? After trial, then what?

  • superkret@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    180
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    11 days ago

    …and all that came of the whole affair was a bunch of bad reviews for a McDonald’s, which were promptly deleted by the corporation controlling all data.

    • Olgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      177
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 days ago

      No, there was a lot more that came of this (unless you’re specifically referencing the snitching part).

      • It’s made business execs afraid.
      • It’s shown the working class how to have solidarity.
      • It’s been a rallying cry for how much the people hare the current system.
      • It’s given us a martyr.
      • It’s taught the would be school shooters that they’ll get lots of positive attention for redirecting their targets towards those deserving. They’ll get labeled a folk hero, they’ll have people trying to send them money for their legal defense fund, they’ll get their name in the history books. They’ll get everything they ever wanted out of their act of violence.

      And I’m sure there’s more.

    • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 days ago

      I guess Advent Health dropped their proposed anesthesia policy out of the goodness of their heart?

        • granolabar@kbin.melroy.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          11 days ago

          ohh wow, look at that!

          i guess they really do think peasants don’t know how to use common sense and online search, i am sure Securitas and G4S clowns charging a fat fee for this advise too. Classic capitalism strikes again.

          does it actually make these parasites any safer?

          no way to tell really…

    • Krauerking@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 days ago

      Well the employee was also fired and their life ruined, and it’s still early.

        • Krauerking@lemy.lol
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          20
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 days ago

          Being fired? For being a distraction from the work that McDonald’s wants to occur without people associating it with class warfare.

          Honestly it’s probably the manager reacting poorly and once it goes further up the ladder and there is more and more backlash they will turn back on these decisions same as the reward money if they are smart though I think the 10,000 is officially off the table since that was a private 3rd party and the 50,000 will likely be a fraction of that at best.

          Any kind of change from norm gets blamed on whoever they think caused it. And it hits wide and usually the innocent just as much.

            • Krauerking@lemy.lol
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              10 days ago

              That’s fair and I respect your time enough to not post sources that amount to Facebook posts and texts from others that live there.

              I will say it shouldn’t come as such a stretch that a system that believes in those that interrupt the flow of money as villains no matter the reasons for it from protests to victims of bullying would mistreat an old lady who was hoping to get more out of her existence by being good for it.

              So meet my statements with skepticism absolutely! But I implore you to treat as “what if true” rather than “what if false”.

      • TheDoozer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        11 days ago

        I can’t find anything that mentions they were fired. Do you have a source for that? That would be super messed up.

        • Krauerking@lemy.lol
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          10 days ago

          Well I have it from the statements of the woman herself and the somewhat open gossip now of central PA.

          I could try to pull sources but I’m not sure what I could provide that would be considered respectable enough for this community.

          I think she was just put on leave but if you are a part time worker on leave without pay it sure looks like being fired even if on a technicality they can say she wasn’t fired yet. I dunno she’s acting like she was fucked over and I believe it when she thought she would get a bunch of money and be a hero.

          I don’t have sources that talk about people shitting on cars at the McDonald’s but that’s happening too.

    • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      11 days ago

      I’ve already heard a bunch of stories of insurance companies approving procedures they denied the day before.

      This probably saved a bunch of lives.

  • leadore@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    157
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    11 days ago

    This thing about them not getting the promised reward needs to go viral so in the future whenever someone’s thinking of turning someone in to get the reward money, they’ll know they’re highly unlikely to get a damn thing.

      • theneverfox@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        46
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 days ago

        That’s why everyone who cares needs to spread the word.

        People don’t need to care. They might share it as a fun factoid, they might just say that’s crazy and never think about it again

        Until they’re in a position to get a reward… They’ll care then. That little idea they heard in passing will pop up… Maybe it gives them pause.

        $10k is pretty tempting for a lot of people…a chance at a $10k reward they’ve heard rarely is paid out is a lot less tempting

        Maybe they Google it first, maybe they think twice about if the crime is worth reporting. Maybe they see the world in black and white and believe it to be their duty

        It’s worth spreading some information, even to people that don’t care

      • leadore@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        10 days ago

        At this point, we don’t know if it’s true or how true. The odds of them getting the whole $60k is very low, but they might eventually get something out of it, depending on if/when he’s convicted, how much of it they decide to award, and how many other tipsters it would be split with. And then of course, after taxes are deducted!

        Since the issue has gotten some publicity and people may be checking up on it, they’re probably more likely to give them at least something in this case. But whatever the truth is doesn’t matter much these days – the article stating they might not get it is out there, got attention, and I’m saying it should get more attention. People shouldn’t be fooled when they hear a number and believe they will actually just be handed all that money when they call in their tip.

        • Bwaz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 days ago

          Here y’go: free fries with your purchase of a BigMac. Thanks for supporting law enforcement.

      • Manalith@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        10 days ago

        https://kpel965.com/mcdonalds-employee-may-not-get-60000-reward-for-tipping-off-police-about-luigi-mangione/

        This one was posted further up. The tl;dr is that because they didn’t call the NYPD tip line, they definitely* won’t get the $10,000 from them, barring major backlash that may make them walk that back.

        The $50,000 from the FBI is up in the air, but is dependent on him getting convicted. There’s some wording that someone else pointed to about the tip needing to lead to an arrest AND conviction, saying that because the tip itself only lead to the arrest, they won’t be paid, but I’m uncertain about that.

        I mentioned in another comment that if the 1% want us to keep snitching, these high profile situations kinda need to pay out.

      • PresidentCamacho@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 days ago

        Its pure conjecture, there is no one saying they wont be paid, just some “journalists” saying maybe he wont be paid.

        Maybe this might be one of those cases where fuck the truth of the matter, we should just spread this conjecture as truth. Snitches should imagine stitches not riches.

    • Clbull@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 days ago

      It’s gone viral on several meme pages I follow on Facebook…

      Also if this employee doesn’t get rewarded for the tip-off that led to Luigi’s arrest, what kind of message is that going to send to the public about law enforcement? It’s just going to reinforce the already-growing ACAB narrative and make people distrust the police even further…

      Heck, the very real possibility of being publicly outed, shamed, harassed and threatened for being the one to rat on Luigi, and not getting the promised $60,000 reward could end up radicalising more people.

  • pH3ra@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    98
    ·
    11 days ago

    Wait for the next step: the franchise fires the employee because of several 1 star reviews and death threats

    • Buglefingers@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      10 days ago

      I’m pretty sure it’s already corporate policy to not question people abour fake bills or do anything to stop shoplifters (because insured and liability). Wouldn’t be surprised if a new corporate policy crops up if something like that does happen

      • Aeao@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        edit-2
        10 days ago

        Can confirm… store manager.

        I joke that our policy for shoplifters is to offer them a bag.

        In reality it’s to offer them a cart as a non accusatory way of saying “I see you”

        As for bills I had my boss suggest I take them to the bank. I had to clarify “and I tell them I believe there is a counterfeit in there… Right … Otherwise it’s dangerously close to trying to pass a counterfeit myself… A felony…”

        He paused and answered “sure if that makes you more comfortable”

        To be clear I understand and agree with a lot of it. Why should I ask my workers to risk their life over some toothpaste? Why should I ask them to risk their life confronting a counterfeiter who is already done commiting felonies.

        I also understand it doesn’t help the company. One dead worker will cost the company more than all the product a person could steal. Even with insurance the cost of training even a cashier is nearly $1000. It goes up from there.

        It is still frustrating and my employees often take a lot of training to convince them not to care if someone is stealing.

        And customers also get frustrated when they tell me someone is stealing and I give them an answer like "that’s unfortunate " and go back to work.

        • dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 days ago

          and I give them an answer like "that’s unfortunate "

          You might want to also let them know that “we’re insured for this” and that “nobody is going to lose their job over this, so let’s not lose our heads, either.”

          Also, it’ll go a long way to acknowledge how unfair it is that an employee doing the same thing is completely different.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        I’ve never worked at McDonald’s but I know for a fact that pizza hut had a policy of not pursuing thieves, we were explicitly told not to do it.

        At one point somebody did walk out without paying and the manager yelled at everyone, because literally none of us noticed. But he couldn’t really do anything to us about it because corporate policy was that we weren’t supposed to do anything, even though obviously he wanted us to have done something.

        • Aeao@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          Off topic but I was a manager of a pizza hut for a while. Drove my district manager nuts with technicalities.

          “How many pepperonis go on a large one topping?”

          “I look at the chart”

          “As a store manager you should have it memorized!”

          “As a store manager I have the training manual memorized. It says to look at the chart each and every time you make a pie. It specifically discourages memorizing the portion control. look at the chart every time.”

          The answer he wanted was 56 back then btw. 56 pepperoni on a large one topping. I still remember that. The correct answer was “look at the chart” so that was the only answer I gave him.

          Another funny story, it was my first food service job. He yelled at me for using the sanitizing cloth from the pizza area on the wing area. Cross contamination, I know that now.

          I told him I didn’t know about cross contamination and that it was my first job in food service.

          He yelled “I trained you myself”

          I replied “yeah … I wasn’t going to mention that but you did train me yourself… Yet here I am not knowing anything about the concept of cross contamination… Maybe more time should be devoted to that in the future”

          He did not like me lol

          Edit: I had been a retail manager for a few years and got hired on as a store manager for pizza hut. I was vocal that I had zero experience with food. I don’t even cook for myself. I microwave or order food. I know it sounds silly now that I didn’t know anything about cross contamination. I didn’t know, he hired me, he didn’t explain it during training. Call me stupid for not knowing, that’s fine. Hes responsible for making sure I knew, he was my trainer. That’s his fault. I’m still a manger (retail again) and it is very much my job to train my crew properly and never assume something is “common sense”. If it’s important you go over it in training… But I guess I never trained any of my cashiers to not throw poop at customers I just assume that’s common sense… So I guess there’s that flaw in my theory lol

          • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            6 days ago

            Oh I wouldn’t worry about it I grew up extremely privileged and when my parents insisted I actually got a job I really didn’t understand the concept of being paid. I didn’t quite understand why anybody cared about that because the money was so insignificant, why would anybody care about it?

            I was a really stupid kid. At one point I worked at a petrol station (gas station) for free because I didn’t really understand what jobs were for.

            I was a really really stupid kid.

            • Aeao@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              6 days ago

              I totally get that. After pizza hut I worked for 4 months at a dominos franchise with my friend Kayla. The franchise owner would bring his son around sometimes. He was probably around 17-18. To be clear they were rich. Franchise owner of a dominos doesn’t sound like much but he owned like 10 including the one we worked at on international drive in Orlando Florida. It’s like the Vegas strip of Florida.

              Anyway his son loved hanging out with Kayla and I because we didn’t give one single shit that he was the owners son. He thought it was wild that i would be a total smartass to his dad…Also Kayla was pretty hot. I’m asexual so we were only just friends but the boy clearly had a crush

              Anyway some conversations I remember that shocked his son

              His dad: I need the key to the cash drawer Me: it’s my drawer, only mine. I can ring the customer up. Dad: I’m not going to steal from my own business- Me: you’re divorced right? so you understand that mistakes happen even with the best intentions? No. You can’t have my key

              Manager meeting at ale house.

              Other managers order

              Me: I’ll have a double scotch in water and (burger order)

              Owners son: can we drink at this meeting?

              Me: I can because I’m over 21 lol

              Owner: no one can drink. It’s an employee meeting. Waiter cancel the scotch.

              Me: I’m sorry Is this a paid meeting?

              Owner: no it’s team building

              Me: but you’re paying for all of our orders at least?

              Owner: no, you aren’t required to order food if you don’t want to. It’s just an option that you can choose.

              Me: cool. Since it’s my time and my money I choose to order a double scotch with water.

              Kayla: I’ll take a margarita with my order.

              Sorry I don’t have any real point I’m making. Just reminiscing. And yes scotch in water is a real drink. It’s not a common drink but it’s been around as long as scotch has. It brings out the more subtle flavors of the scotch.

  • granolabar@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    99
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 days ago

    The owner class and their government muppets are flexing right now as if they want to inflame tensions.

    Or are they not reading the room?

    • Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      114
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 days ago

      They have learned over decades that they can do whatever the fuck they please. They don’t need to read the room, nothing is gonna happen to them anyway. Also, the public just voted their mascot into the White House for 4 years despite 34 convictions, so they are truly invincible and they know.

      • granolabar@kbin.melroy.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 days ago

        The internet would never condone targeted violence as that is a violation of ToS, sir, but we also don’t have to have any sympathy for Brian “the Parasite” Thompson.

        • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          11 days ago

          All I am saying is that if you see a dog snarling, don’t poke it with a stick. It seems … ill advised.

          • granolabar@kbin.melroy.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            11 days ago

            Sir, the elites are literally bringing out the sticks for since these dog appearing to be losing their obedience…

            A few years back during COVID some dude got to TV to tell us how a hungry dog is obedient dog. We just accepted it and I died a bit on the inside then.

            But I am proud to be an American again now, at least where we known dead CEOs is a thing!

      • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        33
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 days ago

        whoo, downvotes and no replies

        Yeah, posting bullshit gets that. Get your facts straight before you start shitting on other people for being like Reddit.

        You’re peak fucking redditor here bud.

      • Pacattack57@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        edit-2
        11 days ago

        First of all Reddit is responsible because they created and actively allow moderators to act the way they do. They perpetuate the fantasy that mods are all powerful and Reddit admins hands are tied when a person is targeted by a mod.

        Second the person worked there so it’s extremely ironic a slave wagee ratted on a person that was targeting corporate inequality and they denied her the payout.

      • underwire212@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        11 days ago

        Then what criteria do you judge a platform based off of? A large part of why I left Reddit was because of the mods…? And the company can certainly do stuff to fix that, but refuse to because money. So if that’s not the case, then I assume you mean the actual structure and layout of Reddit.

        And parent comment is saying the employee is a class traitor. Not the, physical structure and layout of the building? The physical building itself didn’t rat, because physical buildings aren’t sentient.

        Your analogy is absolute dog shit.

      • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        11 days ago

        It wasn’t someone who was eating there bro, it was the Lumpenproletariat in the drive-through window.

      • pH3ra@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 days ago

        When you think everyone else is an asshole you might double check

  • qx128@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    85
    ·
    11 days ago

    Did they seriously not give the snitch the bounty? Can anyone provide official news story on this?

    • unphazed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      11 days ago

      Conviction is required, and the informant needs formal recognition by the FBI as a recognized informant first. Karen just called 911, forfeiting the reward.

      • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 days ago

        Lol of course there’s stupid hoops like that.

        So anybody who is out and about and sees a fugitive with a publicized reward should know…don’t call 911. Call John Walsh, or pound sand.

        Probably gotta call a specific extension that’s only staffed from 10am to 2:30pm with a 2 hour lunch from 11:15 to 1:15 on the first and third weeks of the month and 12:15 to 2:15 on the other weeks.

    • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      11 days ago

      That’s hillarious. If this were a movie I’d call it bad writing. Heck almost any editor in the world would have it changed to a scene where the snitch is suddenly blinged the fuck out.

      • lunarul@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        10 days ago

        almost any editor in the world would have it changed to a scene where the snitch is suddenly blinged the fuck out.

        Because it would make for a more interesting story, even though that’s now how it works (fortunately).

        Snitching on your neighbor because he kinda looks like the guy should not be rewarded. Unless he’s convicted, he’s innocent. Only if proven guilty you can say the snitch helped and give them their reward. If the person is innocent then the snitch did nothing more than just waste everyone’s time.

  • CrayonRosary@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    75
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 days ago

    Anyone have a citation about the rat not getting the money? People keep saying that, but I haven’t seen a single article posted about it.

      • MyNameIsAtticus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        61
        ·
        11 days ago

        this doesn’t really add to the discussion, but i just wanted to say thanks for sharing a source. I feel like i don’t see it enough, so i appreciate you taking the time to share it

        • Victor@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          edit-2
          10 days ago

          I don’t feel like you need to apologize for excuse saying a heartfelt thank you with a text comment, just because it doesn’t add to the discussion. We need more of this kindness in the world. ❤️

      • CrayonRosary@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 days ago

        both the arrest and conviction of the suspect

        Makes perfect sense, but that’s just a matter of time.

        might not be eligible for [the NYPD] part of the reward.

        OK, so maybe they won’t be getting 10k of the 60k. They would still get 50k if he’s convicted. So many people are definitively saying that they’re getting none of the money, and that makes no sense.

        • chillinit@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 days ago

          The tip didn’t contribute to conviction, only the arrest. The words “both” and “and” rather than “consequent” are explicit.

          The rat won’t be paid.

    • BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      11 days ago

      I don’t have a citation. But I do believe that you’d normally have to wait for a conviction before getting the reward. Otherwise it could be the wrong guy.

      • CrayonRosary@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        11 days ago

        I was thinking the same thing. So why is everyone on Lemmy saying “The snitch didn’t even get the money, so they did it for nothing!”

        • Manalith@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          10 days ago

          Because they didn’t read any of the sources and just heard about the NYPD requirement that they call the tip line, which they didn’t do, so unless there’s some major backlash, they definitely won’t be getting $10,000 of the reward.

          The other $50,000 from the FBI we’re all kinda assuming will have some other reason to not be paid out, but if we’re being honest, if the 1% want us to continue turning on each other in the future, they’re gonna have to let these high profile snitching cases go through.

    • PresidentCamacho@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 days ago

      There isn’t actually any citation for this, there is however a bunch of articles written pointing to the red tape around reward money and saying “maybe” he wont be paid. But so far I havnt seen anything that shows this as more than conjecture

      Also this snitch not being paid would be the dumbest fucking move imaginable if their goal is to have murdering Capitalists not be the new trend.

      • can@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        124
        ·
        11 days ago

        NYPD Crime Stoppers Rules: The NYPD part of the reward is given out through Crime Stoppers. To claim this part, people must have a unique reference number provided when they submit a tip through Crime Stoppers. Unfortunately, because the employee called 911 instead of using the Crime Stoppers hotline, they might not be eligible for this part of the reward.

        What a fucking joke. Hope everyone learns the lesson here.

          • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            11 days ago

            Right? If I tried I’d just write a scene where she’s leaving with a fat sack of cash and then learns that her important knee surgery will cost, two fat sacks of cash.

    • demizerone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      11 days ago

      I highly doubt that with the current climate and visibility of this they don’t pay the class traitor.

  • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 days ago

    Let this be a lesson to any other proles who think Big Brother is somehow on your side. They are not.

    They will do and say anything they can to ensure they get what they want, and the rest of us lose. The system is not broken; it’s working as it was designed.

    Next time keep your head down and your mouth shut.

  • TheEighthDoctor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    Is it just me that doesn’t believe the McDonald’s employee thing? I think they used a Pegasus or Stingray type privacy violating device/exploit and just said it was a restaurant employee.

    • leadore@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 days ago

      Or they pretended to be a customer and said to the employee, “Gee, that guy really looks a lot like the killer, doesn’t he, ha ha wouldn’t that be funny, anyway give me a big mac and fries. He does look like him though.”

    • el_bhm@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 days ago

      Pegasus is a scalpel. Needs to be applied and targeted. Stingray is old news and common. It is a catch all.

      Was this used? Given how much money could have been thrown at it, very likely.

    • Pelicanen@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 days ago

      Too many people forget this part. Luigi Mangione is, until proven otherwise, innocent. The police, the same people who have spent decades killing them people (especially minorities) and planting evidence, largely with impunity, are alleging that he is the one who did it. Luigi is likely a victim of the health insurance industry but, until it is proven otherwise, he and the shooter are two separate individuals.

      People with a lot of wealth and power want to put a bow on this to prevent more frustration from being directed at them.