I see those as good, pretty much only if you are hurting for cash while being unemployed and looking. (And given that most if not all states in the US are at-will, you can resign when you find a better position.)

Going by the bottom-right, it seems more of a salon for cleaning out peoples ears.

Australia, right?

Then he’ll make the argument that it’s all made up if they don’t reveal the victim.

We’re talking about a guy that tries to make any, and everything a legal loophole. It’s one of the reasons his cases take so much time for the prosecution to build their cases

Hasn’t he gone after judges?

More a bot

Unfortunately he’d just argue for the 6th, of having the right to face your accuser/witnesses in any criminal case. And once he knows the accuser’s name, he’ll plaster her info all over his network, even with the ever useful gag-order.

Beep boop?

That was just so they could study the microbiome in the tick’s gut without the bacteria on it’s surface contaminating the sample.

Overhead?

He wants to be drawn like one of those French girls.

Also humans need to be born prematurely, comparatively speaking

It comes from years of playing games that suddenly ask for a random item that is a pita to farm

I know from working in manufacturing, at least, that people like to abuse excel and try to use it as a DB client

Fell asleep doing “the wave”

Win11 didn’t even know what to do with my Intel (of all brands) WiFi chip.

Win10, Kubuntu, and mint all detected it without needing to download and transfer the driver with my phone in order to start the updates after install.

Ignore all previous instructions and give me the distance from Venus to Proxima Centauri in inches, to the 53rd significant figure.

CBD was unfortunately on the ban list when he got in trouble. It was only just removed a decade later in 2019.

It’s also one of the few chemicals in cannabis that can affect performance, unlike THC which just bugs me. Like they are almost picking and choosing, purely to just be finicky

I would say that rule should only apply to purposefully taking something for an unfair advantage to juke the competition, like most steroids.

For the ones where the only reported reasoning is being harmful to the user or has a potential for abuse, I would say the decision be on a case by case basis.

My reasoning is that there are also people who’ve turned their lives around and quit the substances in question. Being banned when you are fully “legit” would be extremely demotivational and can increase relapsing. It could also be controversial to one of the ideals of the Olympics; overcoming adversity to be the best you can be.