• melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    3 days ago

    Megan Kelly follows the “if you’re old enough to bleed, you’re old enough to breed” playbook.

  • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    3 days ago

    It’s only paedophilia if it comes from the pedophile region of Alabama. Otherwise it’s just sparkling ephebophilia.

  • saigot@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    85
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    He’s not a Pedophile unless he comes from the Pedo region of Epstein Island, otherwise he’s just sparkling child molester.

  • KnitWit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    230
    ·
    5 days ago

    There’s a difference between a 15-year-old and a 5-year-old, you know?

    She should not be able to walk down the street without constant reminder of making this statement about victims of sex trafficking. Absolute monster of a person.

    • gdog05@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      74
      ·
      5 days ago

      There’s a difference between a 15-year-old and a 5-year-old, you know?

      “There really is, one is annoying and one is hot”. -Trump, probably

    • ameancow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      I want every single, sheltered Lemmy progressive to use this opportunity to SPAM every message board, every subreddit, every facebook group, with this clip, this story, Megan Kelly’s warp-distorted face rationalizing the abuse of children.

      THIS is the shit we need to be doing and putting all our energy into instead of infighting about what words are problematic.

      • doingthestuff@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        4 days ago

        I mean, you will succeed in turning some people away from Megan Kelly but mostly only dying boomers are watching her anyway.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        I agree with the sentiment, but you lost me at using corporate social media. Eww.

        Can we shove these clips in MAGA CHUDs’ faces IRL instead, please?

        • ameancow@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          4 days ago

          using corporate social media

          If you can reach enough people, do what you will, but it’s ridiculous to be performative about it, millions of conservatives use social media, they trust social media, social media is what got trump fucking elected to begin with.

    • Cruel@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      Why? It’s different both legally and clinically. Almost all states increase the severity of the crime for younger victims, usually choosing the delineating age around 12 or 13.

    • NewSocialWhoDis@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 days ago

      Let’s be real. The right is “protecting kids from trans people” because they think transexuality is socially contagious and they don’t want to fuck trans kids.

      • SabinStargem@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 days ago

        Or worse, the trans kids refusing to fuck conservatives. Far as a turdpublican goes, other people exist to be exploited, and a willfully chosen sexual identity can be a roadblock. People developing a personality inherently means having the willpower to say “NO!”.

  • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    4 days ago

    She has a 14 year old daughter

    If you tell someone not to fuck kids and their response is “actually 15 year olds aren’t kids” then that person is a pedo.

    • ryry1985@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      76
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      5 days ago

      Yes, it’s technically Hebephilia or Ephebophilia. That doesn’t change the level of disdain.

      • 4am@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        4 days ago

        Life imitates art as one of our favorite Gianmarco shorts comes to life

      • skibidi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        It is a useful distinction when considering possible rehabilitation. In general conversation it’s just weird.

      • QuoVadisHomines@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        4 days ago

        The best explanation I have seen was that it’s like death metal sure there’s varying types and styles within death metal but at the end of the day the only ones who really care about those distinctions are death metal fans.

        (My apology to any death metal fan offended by the comparison)

        • krashmo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          4 days ago

          I don’t think a 20 year old dating a 17 year old falls into that category but it would fall under the legal definition you’re referring to in many states. That’s the problem with drawing arbitrary lines, you usually end up labeling some things incorrectly. That doesn’t mean you get rid of the line but understanding the context is still important.

          That being said, there is no amount of context that will lessen the creepiness of a 50+ year old man serially preying upon 15 year old girls. That’s disgusting and I find Megyn Kelly’s invocation of this defense to be indefensible. She should be ashamed of herself if she were capable of feeling shame.

          • hateisreality@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            4 days ago

            Yeah of course a 20 year old dating a 17 year old is fine…we all know this isn’t what they are talking about…it’s disgusting people trying to justify someone old enough to be their parent or grandparent…

            Maryland has a system in place to protect teenagers…the age of consent is 16 (which if you’re over 21, shame on you) but there’s a 4 year sliding clause, so for example if your 17, a pissed parent cannot charge you for having relations with their 14 year old, if all was on the up and up.

            I’m in my 40s and anyone under 30 is too young.

        • Cruel@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          Being sexually attracted to 17 year old females makes someone a reprehensible creep?

          Most straight men probably fit into that.

          • NewSocialWhoDis@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 days ago

            17 year olds still tend to be physically less developed… But even if they’re not, if you’re more than a handful of years older than the 17 year old, having a sexual relationship with them is still exploitative since they’re still mentally (both emotionally and reasoning abilities) immature.

            • Cruel@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 days ago

              I agree.

              But being attracted to someone is distinct from having a sexual relationship with them. I can be attracted to a married person, a mentally ill or incompetent person, or even a minor. It’s not necessarily wrong unless I engage with them.

    • Hannes@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      I mean it’s kind of important to be more mindful about the choice of words in general as many people say pedophile but mean child predator.

      There are many people born with that attraction to kids that never act on it or even actively seek help.

      The whole “let’s call everyone a pedophile” is doing more harm than good as it creates a huge stigma preventing people from looking for help.

      That said: they are 100% not caring about that at all and just moving the goalpost…

      • TheFogan@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        I do 100% agree that the concept of having hugely varied terms for pedophile, and say the term Minor attracted person, and get really sick of hearing people lash out on when the term MAP is used to say “You just want to protect pedophiles”.

        No I want people who have the urge to abuse children, to get treatement and never act on it and live peaceful happy lives where they never harm an innocent person, and to me that is far better of an outcome than a child being abused, but supposedly it gets made up for by the abuser getting tortured in prison.

        • moakley@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          I don’t know. Can’t we just stigmatize it to the point where their only recourse is to turn to faith and try to live a life of celibacy and denial? They can all become priests or something. That’ll help them with the internalized guilt while they’re at it!

        • warbond@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          4 days ago

          Perhaps it’s a personal failing but I generally don’t care why somebody doesn’t abuse minors, I only really care that they don’t abuse minors.

      • Grimy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        If the person has never acted on it, then there isn’t really anyway to know and he wouldn’t be labeled with it.

        I guess we could be more accepting of people that just download pictures, but downloading those pictures is acting on it, and shows that they have trouble controlling it.

        I get your point, and that it isn’t always their fault, but the link between both words seems very justified imo.

        • dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          4 days ago

          Except that people who have not acted on it and are seeking support in continuing to not act on it are afraid of identifying themselves as pedophiles because the association, even amongst mental health professionals, is with the action and not the thoughts.

      • RattlerSix@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        I’ve never heard the word hebophile and I bet a lot of people haven’t either. Sometimes when unfamiliar words are introduced as part of a story or event, they become a central part of that story and forever linked to it. Maybe people should use it more regarding trump.

    • ZoteTheMighty@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      I really wish I lived in a world where psychiatrists could spend time inventing terms for people who prefer rogue-likes versus people who prefer rogue-lites instead of this shit.

    • ristoril_zip@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      I learned about hebophilia yesterday and today I started wondering if I’m supposed to be pronouncing ephebophilia as “ep-hebophilia” or was i right saying “ef-ebophilia”

  • varjen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    If you use the definition of hebephilia or ephebophilia as an argument about anything I’m going to think of you as a pedophile.

  • PeacefulForest@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    3 days ago

    Ohh okay so now we’re going with the “they’re mature to marry once they hit puberty” thing Somalia does. I feel real bad for Megyn Kelly’s 14 year old daughter.

    What a POS

  • ikidd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    3 days ago

    Ah, Megyn, glad it’s not some guy spouting “old enough to bleed, old enough to breed” like my drunk uncle at Thanksgiving…

  • TipRing@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    118
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    It is so predictable that conservatives would end up in “Pedophilia isn’t that bad” once it became undeniable that Great Leader raped little girls.

    • droopy4096@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      46
      ·
      5 days ago

      funny that QAnon stuff circled around Dems having pedo-leanings and that was an OUTRAGE yet now it turns out to be OK, Humane even… wtf? Their morals exist only to stick it to anyone opposing them and they evaporate the second one of their own is caught doing exact thing

      • ameancow@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        5 days ago

        Q-anon was never about children.

        It was always about the fantasy headline: “Uneducated Everyman Uncovers Massive, World-Altering Secrets and Becomes Huge Hero by Decoding Publicly Published Materials for Unique Connections and Number Puzzles”

        They are entirely damaged or dumb or religiously brainwashed people who are so deeply insecure about their lack of factual understanding of the world, that Q-anon became their “gateway” to some kind of real way to impact the world and be recognized for something good.

        When a family member of mine fell down this pitcher-plant of mental illness and delusion, I went deep and hard into learning everything I could about the movement and conspiracy culture. Sadly my family member could not be pulled out and was at one point arrested for trying to… abduct girls. Seriously. He rationalized that he was trying to “save” them.

        • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          I read somewhere that people like conspiracy theories because it gives them a sense that they know secret information that others don’t know.

          • ameancow@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 days ago

            I wish I could say my family member was my only exposure to conspiracy derangement, but I’ve know a handful of them.

            And it’s ABSOLUTELY what you said. These are people who don’t understand things. They don’t have a grasp of scale of things, they don’t know math and numbers and don’t get how populations work and how systems work, from city infrastructure to political institutions. They get severely insecure or anxious when something comes up that makes them feel that insecurity… like almost any news story or political scandal.

            So they write their own story using magic and mysticism and ideas they pulled from grifters online basically telling children’s stories and fairy tales about flat worlds and goblins who steal children.

            Having a “secret” story makes them feel knowledgeable, like they have something they can teach others, a way to be relevant and respected. Even if it’s just by other delusional people.

            • absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              4 days ago

              Yep, this pretty much nails it.

              The conspiracy makes them feel a sense of importance that they can’t get in any other aspects of their lives. It is sad, these people cause real harm to those around them with these fantasy worlds they buy into.

              Telling them they are wrong, often just feeds the delusion; because you don’t know the secrete, this makes them feel more of the same, feeding the conspiracy further.

            • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              4 days ago

              There is also a kind of reverse virtue signaling to each other about how “edgy” they are when it comes to being steeped in/buying into what they think is insider knowledge…

              For example, the ones that claim they are flat-earthers - I honestly think many of them might not really believe it, but use it as a way to play the kid skipping science class and smoking out behind the school, basically as a way to raise up their middle finger to annoy the people they think are just being schoolmarms: “you’re not going to tell ME what to believe, I did my own research!”

              The reality is, anyone they think of as a schoolmarm (“normie”) just mostly would rather ignore these asshats, and just roll our eyes at their juvenile and backward ways. Sadly, what these idiots do in large groups ends up harming everyone - e.g., not vaccinating, being terrible at reasoning skills, basic numeracy and literacy, while at the same time being able to vote for the Republicans.

              • ameancow@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                4 days ago

                There is much of what you describe in these communities, and a lot of it is even simpler and sadder than that, which is people desperately scared of death and clinging to religion to provide some level of comfort.

                One of my favorite documentaries of all time is Dan Olsen’s In Search of a Flat Earth, it’s a sublime journey that starts with a beautiful and pleasant journey into measuring the humbling scope and scale of our world, and in the second act, delves deep into conspiracy theorists and their motivations.

    • FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 days ago

      But they’re still probably gonna push to prosecute lgbtq people as pedophiles. They should at least have to pretend to be consistent.

    • doingthestuff@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      There’s a few pedos in every group, also pedo haters. JD Delay is not a Trumper but he’s conservative and always advocates for the woodchipper for pedophiles, but he’s been mostly pointing out pedophiles on the left. That said, he would advocate the woodchipper for any and all of them. His merch includes "“Make Pedophiles Scared Again” shirts and “Woodchipper for President '28” hats.