Of course former law enforcement is going to own a Glock and have time on it. That’s pretty much a given. They even have an officer purchase program.

https://us.glock.com/en/buy/blue-label-program

Depends on how much you care about statistics…

Well, that’s what the implant is for. Battery’s good for 3-4 years.

Back in January, in the hospital, my heart stopped for 8 seconds. I was asleep, I had no idea. I woke up and was fiddling on my phone, nurse comes in:

“Were you asleep about an hour ago?”

“Yeah, why?”

“Your heart stopped for 8 seconds.”

“Um… thank you? I don’t know how to respond to that…”

I have a heart monitor connected to my phone now, continuously monitoring. It’s stopped a few more times since then, 4 seconds here, 5 seconds there. Doc says not to worry about it, no cause for a pacemaker yet.

Of course former law enforcement is going to own a Glock and have time on it. That’s pretty much a given. They even have an officer purchase program.

https://us.glock.com/en/buy/blue-label-program

Or blankets. Or coats. Just cover the screen.

Best advert for Daddio ever, since now I’m aware of it and previously I was not.

That would be outside the scope of moderation, but DMs have a report option that goes to the Admins of their instance and your instance.

Admins can and do ban people for that. As a mod, I’ve had to report more than a few DMs myself.

Not really an article, content is in video format which is not allowed.

As I’ve stated before, we’ve discussed Monk’s account between the admins and the mods, the consensus opinion is that they have shitty opinions, but having shitty opinions is not a TOS violation.

We’d be able to pay for a better fact checker than MBFC.

Great book on the topic:

https://www.amazon.com/dp/0393310728

Good example:

Let’s say the statistic says for a given area, violent crime rose 27% over a 10 year period.

You leave out the inconvenient fact that the population rose 30% over the same period of time and the per capita RATE of violent crime is down.

To be clear, MSN IS allowed, it’s just that last link made it look like they were claiming credit for a W.E. article. Not your fault.

OK, this is weird. I’m removing this but I want everyone knowing why:

This is a link on MSN, which passes through to the Washington Examiner.

WE does not have the same credibility rating as MSN, it’s significantly lower, and has more bias:

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/washington-examiner/

If it had just been the WE link, I’d allow it, but gathering up a false “high credibility rating” when that doesn’t exist for WE is a problem.

There’s a difference between seeing things differently and claiming to not see a difference.

A 2nd Trump term will actively injure more people, Americans and non-Americans alike, than a Harris term. Full stop.

Pretty sure that’s his brand identity. ;)

All sealioning is trolling but not all trolling is sealioning. ;)

Removed, civility.

Removed, civility.

In fairness, West votes aren’t going to be enough to make a difference anyway.

The logical work-around is for supporters to write him in, ignoring the ballot line that won’t be counted.

But still, write ins are insignificant.