• Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    121
    ·
    20 days ago

    I disagree (with the title but agree with you the post), Jan 6th should truly be the dealbreaker. Why? Cause it’s not even politics, it’s simple rules of games.

    If you can’t accept when you lose, you don’t get to play anymore.

    They had 4 years to jail him over treason and they didn’t. I said it before and I’ll say it again, Biden should have jailed him for Jan 6th.

    • crusa187@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      73
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      20 days ago

      Biden should have used the bully pulpit and pushed hard to prosecute. Merrick Garland is technically the one who sat on his ass for 2 years before getting started, which is how Trump was able to delay through the election then throw out his own cases.

      Based on the strong bipartisan coverup of the Epstein Files, clearly there are reasons Biden’s donors didn’t want to prosecute one of “their own.” So they didn’t, because the people don’t get represented in America, only capital owners do.

    • snooggums@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      edit-2
      20 days ago

      Biden should have had him and the rest of the isurrectionists executed for trying to overthrow throw democracy. Jailing them just changes their platform for inciting rebellion.

        • KelvarCherry@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          20 days ago

          The only reason the Jan 6th rioters got in the Capitol is because Donald Trump specifically chose not to call in the National Guard to protect the Capitol. If MAGA had attempted a second insurrection when Trump was jailed and Biden was in office, they wouldn’t have gotten anywhere.

          This is the kinda stuff I laughed about pre-last election when MAGA was calling for civil war if Kamala won. It’s not funny now, but the truth remains. An outright seizure of the Capitol/White House/SCotUS is nigh impossible unless our leader wants it. Now, the Jan 6th crowd was exceptionally stupid in not even being able to navigate the Capitol floor; but navigation abilities won’t matter when you get gunned down approaching the entrance.

          • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            20 days ago

            also racism, they have to be careful around White people who are committing crimes too, without angering white voter base in general. alot of them pretend to be on the left, but act very wierdly around POCs.

        • chaogomu@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          20 days ago

          It is what they plan for the rest of us. Fascism has always been a sort of “blindly obey the leader or die” sort of thing.

          The second major problem is that a whole bunch of people are then killed, first for being the wrong ethnicity, or killed for having the wrong beliefs, or maybe you just live on land that some rich asshole wants to steal. These people will never even be given a chance to “obey” but will likely be told that they are being killed for disobedience. Or someone will be told.

          And the lie will be believed, because it will be convenient to do so.

    • RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      19 days ago

      Merrick Garland deserves a place in hell with Newt Gingrich, The Koch Family, Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch, and Mitch McConnell.

      Now I personally believe that Garland was just that incompetent rather than malicious as the others are.

      However, his incompetence is dammingly damaging to the future of the entire planet.

  • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    20 days ago

    I’ll never understand how Biden just let that go. He should have made it impossible for Trump or any of the other criminals from the previous administration to participate in politics again.

    • GreenBottles@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      19 days ago

      If I were Biden, locking all those traitors up would have been priority number one. Had they done that, the world would be a much better place.

      • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        19 days ago

        If not then, the very instant the supreme court ruled that anything the president does is legal as long as it’s an official act.

    • scarabic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      19 days ago

      I agree with you, though I don’t know what measures he could have taken, specifically, to ensure that.

          • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            19 days ago

            We don’t have to agree. He was in power, he can decide. Just like Trump is deciding what counts as “hate speech” now.

            • scarabic@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              19 days ago

              We do agree. It’s just like I said, I am not sure what mechanism he could use exactly to do this. Presidents don’t just declare people traitors and criminals and jail them. If they could, Trump would have the entire Democratic Party in the slammer. There might have been more Biden could do, I just don’t know exactly what. And you don’t seem to either.

              • RagingRobot@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                19 days ago

                He waited almost two years to take any action on this because he didn’t want to look like it was a political attack but trump was going to play that card either way. If he had told them to start working from day one this wouldn’t be happening. There was plenty he could have done but he was too wrapped up in the old system of traditions to understand that things have changed.

              • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                18 days ago

                The supreme court literally said that anything the president does is legal as long as it’s an offical act. He should have done whatever needed to be done. Regardless of the law. If people had problems with it we could have dealt with him after the fact and revised whatever laws needed to be revised. He’s old as shit anyway so had nothing to lose. Instead he sat on his hands and allowed Trump to regain power leaving us to deal with the consequences while he will be dead before long anyway.

    • Omega@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      20 days ago

      It’s the moderates and centrists that worry me. I know he had a laundry list of deal breakers. But after Jan 6th, he should have lost every sliver of support from anyone who doesn’t support treason.

      • aow@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        20 days ago

        The problem is that he did, in that moment, and then media and people walked it back and minimized it for 3.5 years until by the time everyone voted again, well, he didn’t go to prison so maybe they made it up or it wasn’t so bad? See also: his felonies were “political”.

        Truth is that most Americans are so busy living or surviving that they don’t go learn or seek out different views to become more well-rounded. Propaganda works.

  • ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    20 days ago

    I don’t understand why AIPAC, Citizens United, exorbitant health care and education costs, tax rates for the rich, slavery in prisons, and every other goddamned ridiculous thing that other first world countries don’t have wasn’t a deal breaker.

    • KelvarCherry@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      20 days ago

      While I agree, what would it mean for these to be “dealbreakers”?

      Bill Clinton gave tax rates for the rich, but he didn’t run on that – he ran on expanding the Middle Class. Barack Obama ran on a platform of fixing healthcare, and he sorta did. Citizens United v FEC was decided in 2010. The next election, Bernie Sanders’ common-sense social safety nets were wildly popular among Democats and purple state voters – not enough to beat the entire Democratic line-up that gave their delegates to Hillary Clinton, but still very popular.

      On the debate stage, Donald Trump called out the same ridiculous Republican warmongering and perils of the USAmerican people that Bernie called out. In doing so, Trump sweeped out Jeb Bush, Ted Cruz, and every other preferred neo-conservative candidate – while being a billionaire rapist fraudster who owned a gold-plated apartment. Trump continued that diagonalization campaign strategy in 2024, to great success. He’s naming real issues, and rallying up support with it, because people are exactly as fed up as you presume they should be. This is why MAGA voters are so aggressive. This is what the Jan 6th insurrectionists thought they were fighting for.

      While I curse out the generation before me who allowed this country to get this way, I can’t really say what they should have done differently. It’s not like there weren’t massive anti-war protests. It’s not like the USA populace wanted to be deployed in Iraq, or Afghanistan, or Iran. Bush hid the facts. It’s not like people want these massive medical costs and unreasonable student loans… but what do we do? Changes were being teased in Congress; there was hope in the Supreme Court; presidential campaigns promised prosperity and ease, and USAmericans clung to that hope.

      So did we sleepwalk through it all? Yes – But I don’t see how people could have been persuaded differently with anything short of foresight of exactly this reality of the year 2025. Reformists aren’t going to burn down the Capitol when Congress is debating Medicare For All, even if it’s the 40th year debating this issue; even after the vote fails.

      • UniversalBasicJustice@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        19 days ago

        You touched on it; Citizens United. Change that and we’re back to a coherent timeline.

        I also think the consolidation of media outlets into massive billionaire-controlled mouthpieces of industry alongside with Cambridge Analytica opening the flood gates on social medianl propagandization were crucial, but Citizens United will always be the death of the USA for me; it just took a few years for the corpse to start really stinking up the place.

      • ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        19 days ago

        I think we can only make more laws and regulations against it moving forward. High school requirements on media literacy and propaganda to graduate. Also, mandatory elections after 30 days of shutdowns. Laws that no votes in a state can be counted until every able voter has cast a ballot. Term limits. Taxes higher as income increases. Assets can’t be hidden as corporate property. Billionaires taxed out of existence. We just have to prevent more shit like it happening again.

  • SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    20 days ago

    Look, all you have to do is accept my one and only axiom: Most people on this planet are total and absolute idiots.

    • dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      19 days ago

      I’m not inclined to agree with “most”, but the idiot:not-idiot ratio in society is way higher than I’m comfortable with. It’s almost enough to make the question the wisdom of putting so many people on the road, driving their own cars.

      The part that really shook me is when I talked to enough people to figure out that stupidity isn’t always obvious. A person can speak well, be exposed to a lot of different news sources, have ample access to information, graduate from a decent school, and still be a total moron when it comes to a lot of things. Like functional illiteracy, grown adults learn how to cope and mask in ways that are shockingly good, considering they cover for huge deficits at the same time.

    • saimen@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      20 days ago

      I mean 50% of the population literally is less intelligent than the average.

    • 87Six@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      20 days ago

      I agree, and I think I’m among them too (no I don’t say that because I voted Trump, I’m not American)

          • bampop@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            20 days ago

            varnia is suggesting you didn’t vote for the Democrats. Which, considering you’re not American, seems highly likely.

            • 87Six@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              20 days ago

              Oh haha okay I had no idea what they meant.

              I did vote for Nicusor Dan in Romania and that guy is as much of a democrat as they get around here haha

  • lennybird@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    20 days ago

    Perception is reality.

    Control news, social media, and church and you can distort/gaslight reality.

    Only the better educated can sometimes see through bullshit.

  • myfunnyaccountname@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    19 days ago

    There are Americans that believe Trump has never lied. Like ever. About anything. He is truth. Some Americans actually believe this.

    • Petter1@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      19 days ago

      So they have no capacity to think logically, not even a tiny bit? Or do they just have no capacity in remembering stuff?

      • sploder@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        19 days ago

        They don’t want to think. At all. Just listen to what they’re told by fox or Facebook and get comfort in hating some group(s) “ worse than them “ while they believe they’re better than most people. They’re fully delusional.

        • SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          19 days ago

          Nah, worse than that. The root of the conservative pathology is self-hatred. They fear that they are worthless, shit people. A person who believes that they are better than everybody else can sit smugly in the corner and be superior in peace. Conservatives need near-constant reassurance that other people are worse than themselves, hence the performative cruelty they crave.

          • TheHighRoad@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            18 days ago

            They are also too cowardly to live freely, so they end up hating actual freedom and those that enjoy it because they hate themselves for allowing their freedom to be robbed by their ideology.

      • Snowclone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        19 days ago

        They are terminally uncurious. Explaining to his cult individually that he has said things himself they can listen to is baffling to them. They only hear it through their filter of choice.

        • GladiusB@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          19 days ago

          I think you are giving them far too much credit. Just as there are short people and tall people and skinny and fat, there are people that don’t have a lot going on upstairs. When I heard that 50% of people don’t have an inner monologue I was astounded. I thought it not to be true. That someone had to have fucked up. Seeing all this play out, it makes way more sense.

  • GladiusB@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    19 days ago

    Mine was George Floyd. When I saw so many people stand up and say that man deserved death over a bounced check I knew they lost their damn mind.

    • vithigar@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      18 days ago

      The idea that death is an acceptable outcome from being suspected of any minor infraction underpins the conversation around basically every police killing, with every single person on the side justifying it being tacitly accepting of that premise.

      It’s lunacy.

    • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      18 days ago

      A few years after 9-11 for me. I grew up watching my classmates sing songs about indiscriminately bombing people in Afghanistan, and news reports of people being beaten or killed in the US for wearing any clothing that appeared Middle-Eastern. It made me sick to my stomach.

    • joan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      19 days ago

      Nobody deserves to die… Even if they’re… uh… charlie kirk… No I think that one’s ok.

        • KelvarCherry@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          18 days ago

          My take on Charlie and similar killings is that we’re in a war, and war is never nice. I don’t believe anyone should be assassinated, but I also don’t believe we’re playing by the rules of civility when we have hundreds of people being disappeared every day by masked agents on our street; and the government is tweeting out Nazi propaganda.

  • Tyrq@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    20 days ago

    The second I saw he was running the first time, I knew it was going to be a disaster. Maybe I couldn’t appreciate just how much of a disaster it would be though

  • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    20 days ago

    “those people are ignorant”

    -My conservative mother, pretending Trump didn’t work tirelessly for years enraging them, tell them to do exactly what they did, and then gleefully watch for 2 hours while they did it.

    In other words, she thinks trump had nothing to do with it, as laughable as that is.

  • SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    20 days ago

    January 6 gave the Nazis hope and basically exposed how easy it is to topple the government if they have law enforcement on their side.

  • Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    20 days ago

    Until my final breath I’ll never understand how George W. Bush wasn’t a dealbreaker for every future Republican president. And then they voted for Trump of all people.

    Like that’s it. We humans have failed evolution.

    • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      20 days ago

      it isnt because evangelicals are afraid of losing thier influence in government, plus thier hold on the US, and oppression of POCs and lgbtq+ people, and are afraid of retribution and reprisal from the latter 2 groups.

    • balsoft@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      19 days ago

      If you pour enough money/resources into anyone, you can get them to win an election. Trump was just the easiest one to pour money into: he’s easily swayed, even more easily bought, and has a certain… shudders charisma (?) that makes him more electable than a rando mild conservative.

      What you’re witnessing here is just capitalism. People with a lot of money and power wanted to gain even more money and power. Trump a convenient vehicle for that. So they poured money into his campaign and he won.

      • Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        17 days ago

        It’s a good reason to consider sortition, or a system that distributes power so that it’s super diffuse.

        An example would be abolition of SCOTUS: Instead we create a special court for each individual case, pulling nine judges at random from the Appeals districts. That way, no Supreme Court justice can be owned the way Thomas and Alito are – or one can, but they’re not likely to get on all the cases a billionaire deems important.

  • aberrate_junior_beatnik (he/him)@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    20 days ago

    It’s because the Democrats didn’t inflict any consequences on Republicans and used the “let’s look to the future and not dwell on the past” framing on it. How can you blame voters for not taking it seriously if Democrats didn’t?

    • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      20 days ago

      You’re speaking of long after Jan 6th occurred. The OP post is talking about on that day. As in, “how did those that would actually stand to benefit become willing to benefit at the cost of following the rule of law?” The disappointing answer is that those performing the insurrection on Jan 6th, as well as those that would stand to gain, are more concerned with being in power rather than respecting justice and the rule of law.

    • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      20 days ago

      alot of the dnc are Dinos, republicans that cant get elected from the right, so they have to pretend to be Dems on some issues, but republicans on most other ones. why we get people like schumer, jefferies, fetterman