• Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    23 hours ago

    I recently played it. If anything I think it has a subtle anti-gambling message.

    The more hands you play, the more you realize you can’t actually win without “cheating”

    Play it like poker? Congrats, you’re fucked, you literally cannot win against the blind.

    Stack the deck in your favor with creative use of Joker cards and a few dozen extra aces? The game becomes trivial

    If the game teaches you anything it’s that if you play by the rules, the house will ALWAYS win.

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I just played it last night, and then again today with my kids watching. I explained how the hands are scored, and they seemed to get the gist of it.

      It has absolutely nothing to do with gambling. You don’t wager anything, there’s no opponents, and the terminology is all different, for example:

      • blind - in poker, it’s a forced bet based on sitting position from the dealer; in Balatro, it’s where you’re at in the “level” (and only the “boss blind” is required)
      • ante - in poker, it’s the minimum bet to participate; in Balatro, it’s the level you’re on
      • hand - in poker, it’s the cards you are dealt, and you play them all; in Balatro, it’s a scoring action, and you only play a subset of your cards in a given “hand”

      And so on. The only thing that’s actually similar is the hand scoring system, but you mess with that as well with buffs and whatnot. Balatro will make you a worse poker player, and not even teach you the rules.

      I don’t think it’s anti-gambling, it has nothing to do with gambling. It’s like saying solitaire and blackjack are similar because they both use playing cards…

  • mhague@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    23 hours ago

    Why don’t people reach out to “Dirk Bosmans, Director General PEGI S.A.”?

    PEGI isn’t a living creature. PEGI isn’t giving out biased ratings. It’s the people working there, and the person in charge. Actual people that actually exist here on this planet with us. “Talking” to a company is imaginary bullshit.

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      24 hours ago

      18 is the highest rating. It’s equivalent to the ESRB “AO” rating, and many storefronts will not sell it, period.

      • GHiLA@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        24 hours ago

        Doesn’t matter to a kid with a phone and unlimited time and willpower. I know with 100% certainty, if I was 16 and wanted to play Balatro, I wouldn’t be talking to you, I’d have an .apk already.

        Storefront? Lmao.

        • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          23 hours ago

          Piracy being the only way to get a game isn’t beneficial to the dev, and Balatro is the kind of game that deserves our money. It could have easily been jammed to the gill with paid boosts premium decks, etc, but instead, they just made a good game.

          • GHiLA@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            22 hours ago

            I went looking for a patreon or donation page… Guys who get hit with this should just go that route. He doesn’t have a general one up.

            We can’t control the bullshit, but we can side-step it.

  • simonced@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    77
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    Tell me you are corrupted to the core, without telling me you are corrupted to the core.

  • spireghost@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    113
    ·
    3 days ago

    The reasoning in question:

    This game teaches - by way of images, information and gameplay - skills and knowledge that are used in poker. During gameplay, the player is rewarded with ‘chips’ for playing certain hands. The player is able to access a list of poker hand names. As the player hovers over these poker hands, the game explains what types of cards the player would need in order to play certain hands. As the game goes on, the player becomes increasingly familiar with which hands would earn more points. Because these are hands that exist in the real world, this knowledge and skill could be transferred to a real-life game of poker

    So, this game teaches skills and knowledge that are used in poker. The skills in knowledge are limited to… playing and making poker hands. That’s it. Also, “as the game goes on, the player becomes increasingly familiar with which hands would earn more points” – is hilariously funny. The idea that knowledge of what a poker hand is is anything related to the dangers of gambling is ridiculous.

    • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      23 hours ago

      I wonder what they rated Pavlov VR, ya know the FPS game in VR that forces you to handle guns the way they would in real life and is popular with ex-military because of their transferrable skills?

      • spireghost@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 hours ago

        I mean that would definitely get an 18 rating, I’m not sure what you are meaning to say

    • SpiceDealer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      2 days ago

      My thief archer build in Morrowind and Skyrim lead me to a life of thievery and now I’m serving a life sentence at maxium security prison. Very sound logic.

    • Laser@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      It’s really dumb if you know the two games (poker and Balatro).

      Poker is a game of incomplete information where you need one single higher ranked hand than your opponent per round. The stakes are money you bet that your hand is better. Bluffing is an important part of the game.

      Balatro is mostly a game with complete information (apart from the order of remaining cards in your deck and certain bosses that flip your cards). You bet no money. There is no bluffing. Money does not correlate to chips. It is about the rating of your hand (poker has no rating, only relative ranking). You play multiple hands. You can’t fold. Bluffing doesn’t exist. Cards can be improved, ratings can be improved, the decks can look nothing like poker decks, etc.

    • Takumidesh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      47
      ·
      2 days ago

      As the game goes on, the poker hands also get increasingly unrealistic and different from real poker including things like five of a kind, and a pair being worth more than a royal flush.

      If you tried to take the skills you learn from balatro to a poker table you would get kicked out basically immediately.

      • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        23 hours ago

        I had a run where I legitimately had to stop and compare the point values a Two Pair Vs. One Pair Vs. Straight Flush

        And ONE PAIR wound up being the one with the highest point value…

        I was still 600 dollars short of winning against the Boss Blind, ending my run

      • Stern@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        I place a torn up joker on the table, a tarot card, a llanowar elf card, and a pair of threes

        “So with my score multiplier basically I own the casino.”

        The dealer frantically calls security

        • Nikelui@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          23 hours ago

          “I’m sorry, the Llanowar Elves are banned, you should keep up with the meta” Activates the Pot of Greed and draw two.

      • Localhorst86@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        2 days ago

        “Sir, you can’t bring stone slabs to the table and play them as if they were cards. Also, where did these glass shards come from?”

      • Wahots@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        I’ve never gambled, but I’m pretty sure if I got 1.630e11 chips at a casino, something bad would happen to me, the casino, and the economy if I cashed it out. I think that’s 84 billion chips…

        • stevedice@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Times are different now, there’s no more turning up in a ditch. If you start winning too often, they’re gonna keep an eye on you and try to determine if you’re cheating. If you’re not, they’re gonna ask you to leave and ban you from the casino before you can actually win anything significant — the justification given is that it’s their casino and they can refuse entry to whoever they want. If you are cheating, then you’re just going to jail.

        • CrazyLikeGollum@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          It’s 163 Billion chips.

          1.630e11 is the same as 1.630 x 10^11

          Which probably wouldn’t be that bad for the economy, but it might bankrupt the casino, depending on the value of the chips.

    • scbasteve7@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      2 days ago

      One “teaches” you to gamble, the other allows you to gamble. And the one that just teaches you has a higher rating. Crazy.

      • GreenAppleTree@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 days ago

        Totally his fault for not heeding the ancient warning.

        Give a man a fish, you get PEGI 3+. Teach a man to fish, 18+ you sucker.

    • charade_you_are@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I know this is anecdotal but I’m now living in a ditch because of Balatro. I never gambled before in my life and all the poker knowledge Balatro me taught caused me to start extreme gambling and now I’m dead in a ditch.

  • ryven@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    173
    ·
    3 days ago

    If you search for “poker” on PEGI’s site, it seems that many games which are actually about simulated gambling are rated 12 or 16. They seem to think Balatro is more likely to expose children to realistic gambling than, say, Prominence Poker or Pure Hold’em World Poker Championship, which seems completely bizarre, given that those games are about playing poker and Balatro is a fancy kind of solitaire with no betting.

    • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      43
      ·
      3 days ago

      The pathetic thing is games of the ilk of balatro and luck be a landlord (also OG peggle) are actually the kind of game that plays with your gambling impulses but in a healthy and fun way, these games should be celebrated for subverting the language of gambling to make something beautiful, how pathetic to have so little actual understanding of video games and yet have this kind of power to impact the industry.

      • KinglyWeevil@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        2 days ago

        I’ve always suspected I might be susceptible to gambling addiction so I stay out of casinos.

        Instead, I go to the arcade. Which is like a low stakes child casino. Win a bunch of tickets and then either buy something stupid with them, or, just straight give them to some kid.

        My point being, we’ve specifically constructed casino-like facilities for children and it’s regularly accepted, so why should Balatro be different?

      • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yeah how dare you pay $9.99 one time to gamble all you want! If you’re gonna get those dopamine hits, you better be spending real money at the tables!

        • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          I want to see someone take an actual slot machine rip out all the evil bits and replace it with a computer running Luck Be A Landlord with custom flashing lights for when you win, the slot machine lever and all that stuff.

          It would be pretty awesome

    • Comment105@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      52
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      3 days ago

      The thing you have to understand about PEGI is that they are mentally challenged.

        • Comment105@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          23
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          You’d have to shut me up and push me out.

          You shouldn’t, you’ve already lost enough allies. It has become very clear that cripples and hall monitors does not a majority make. I don’t believe in your ethical maxims of sensitivity and strict language policing.

          I’m sure you think the celebrated George Carlin is a massive cunt, in duller words.

          • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            Bro, they politely asked you not to use potentially hurtful language in an open forum.

            Is that really how you react in the real world of someone says “I don’t like that, please stop?” Because that’s some abuser-coded behavior right there

            • Comment105@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              coded

              You’ll never successfully change the world like this. This kind of language demonstrably does nothing for you. We all know you believe “the common clay” should shut up and speak through filters approved by you and yours. Fuck you.

              You ruined the culture of the left. You changed it from the side of union men to the side of flamboyant, sensitive baristas. To the point that you lost a lot of the vote even from unionized workers.

              Lose everything in the next 4 years.

              • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                2 days ago

                changed it from the side of union men to the side of flamboyant, sensitive baristas.

                Lol based

                • Comment105@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  18 hours ago

                  I know.

                  Most people see it. Few, except the opposition, point to it as a negative.

                  Partly because they become the opposition by pointing to it. Anyone bothered by the change regardless of their standpoint of taxes, regulation, and public services are labeled right wing and pushed to admit it. They might as well go vote for the billionaires’ cause if they don’t want to shut up about their problems with sensitive liberals, right? Right. So it seems that’s exactly what they did.

                  People don’t like people who tell them to shut up, sit down, and behave.
                  People don’t like people who get so offended that they kick you out.

                  That becomes a problem when you treat the majority like that, and not just a minority of very misbehaved assholes.

                  Guess why “The One Joke” became so prolific? Some creatively gay progressives desperately wanted to push the majority to comply with a set of new very strange expectations and taboos, and went about it in an incredibly obnoxious, reckless way. It became a huge meme because a majority, not an extremist minority, thought it was weird, ridiculous, stupid, overconfident, pathetic, and probably a whole host of other things.

        • Mr_Blott@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          22
          ·
          2 days ago

          Please stop pretending to be offended on other people’s behalf simply to draw attention to yourself

  • De_Narm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    285
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    It’s entirely his fault for not being a multi-billion dollar company which actively invests in better ratings. In capitalism, there is no fairness - there is only money.

    • danc4498@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      3 days ago

      This reminds me of the documentary “This film is not yet rated”. The point was that the MPAA gives way more leniency to big budget studios when giving ratings. The net effect of this is it kills the low budget films before they can be released.

    • SatanClaus@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      54
      ·
      3 days ago

      Yeah came here to echo the same sentiments. He isn’t establishment. Aka he has no voice. As money is speech in America.

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          46
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          And that’s honestly exactly what I would expect. It’s not suitable for a 4yo, but there’s nothing in it to warrant a teen rating either. So yeah, E with a note sounds exactly right.

          • Lem Jukes@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            28
            ·
            3 days ago

            Sure if we were talking about a reasonable, independent ratings agency with the public good as its primary guiding factor. But both the ESRB and PEGI are private, industry run and funded ‘self-regulatory’ agencies that operate with the industries own self interests as its primary guiding factor.

      • TachyonTele@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        31
        ·
        3 days ago

        While you’re not wrong, I doubt the Pan European Game Information ratings board cares that much about speech in America.

      • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Hes no EA, but Balatro has made him a multimillionaire.

        He needs to use some of that money to sue, maybe get the orgs that are fighting gambling/microtransactions onboard.

  • .Donuts@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    176
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    One looks like gambling but is actually a fun roguelite card game, the other one looks like fun but is actually a gambling game. Guess which one is rated 18+?

    spoiler

    Okay I lied, FC24 doesn’t even look like fun, but that’s my personal opinion.

  • FurtiveFugitive@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    79
    ·
    3 days ago

    Is the rating purely because it uses playing cards? Poker hands?

    Yahtzee and literal poker with betting are included in Nintendo clubhouse/worldwide 51 and it’s rated Pegi-12.

    Would balatro get a pass if it used cards numbered 1-13 instead of traditional cards?

    This whole thing is bonkers.

    • forgotaboutlaye@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      3 days ago

      Anyone can walk into a store and buy a deck of cards.

      I bet the gift shop of any casino in Las Vegas would sell a souvenir deck of cards to a kid without a second thought.

      • Blackmist@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        If it wasn’t for regulations, they’d happily let the kids shovel their money into the slots.

        Used to do that all the time as a kid, but a slot machine taking 2 pence a time is a far cry from one where you give it your bank card and go ham.

  • WhyDoYouPersist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    88
    ·
    3 days ago

    This is actually quite eye opening to me, as someone who doesn’t really ever have to look at ratings as a consumer and has always just taken them for granted. Now I’m keenly aware it’s yet another example of runaway capitalism. Just never thought too hard about it.

    PEGI’s a cunt.

    • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      Basically all media ratings bodies are weirdly corrupt and apply ratings without any clear rhyme or reason. There’s good reason to largely ignore the ratings as an adult and even as a parent

    • illi@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      58
      ·
      3 days ago

      In the meantime we can start guessing which side has more money to hire lawyers

  • The Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    67
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    i think it’s clear from this these regulatory bodies primarily function to help the industry make money. indies can sometimes get co-signs from these bodies, but only if they stay in their lane. balatro has been a huge smash hit, and it feels like this body just wants to keep it down that little bit

  • ieatpwns@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    3 days ago

    I’m willing to bet PEGI was lobbied to push for that 18+ rating by ea and other publishers because balatro is taking revenue from them. They don’t get how a game without microtransactions is doing better than they are