• MisterFrog@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        13 hours ago

        How does this have so many upvotes? As long as it’s actually possible to ride your bike in your city, the cost of buying and then maintaining a bicycle is WAY, WAY, cheaper than a car

      • meekah@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        1 day ago

        It’s definitely possible to spend a lot on your bicycle but it is almost certainly cheaper than using and maintaining a car

        • Tomassci@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          1 day ago

          Even the higher-price mid-range bikes are way cheaper than the cheapest cars, and there’s a lot on the bike that you can just do yourself instead of relying on a mechanic, most parts are cheaper as well, lots of bikes allow more personalization…

          Bikes are the paragon of freedom Anericans think cars are.

      • Kaligalis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Bicycles have less mass than a car and therefore need less fossil fuel for their tires. Bicycles are objectively cheaper to buy, maintain, and run than a car, even if you go for the average expensive bicycle and the average cheap car. There just is no way to make the car come out on top when it’s about costs.

      • Noobnarski@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Bike tires don’t usually weigh more than 300g.

        Car tires usually weigh more than 7kg and you need 4 instead of two.

        The only slightest bit of an argument here could be for trains.

        I also need maybe 5 specialised tools to service my bike (which is veeeery easy to do compared to doing it on a car) and those tools together cost less than 200€. Then I spend around 200€ a year or less on parts to service my bike, and I use it to go to work every day.

        My car is sooooo much more expensive than that, even though I do most stuff myself.

      • Katana314@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 day ago

        Yeah, similarly, one could make the mistake of walking. But even sneaker treads use rubber. Same poison!

      • OwOarchist@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        You actually can get bikes for free pretty often, especially if you’ve got the ability to turn a wrench.

        And while modern tires probably do incorporate some fossil ‘fuels’ (technically not fossil fuel if you’re not burning it, by the way), they don’t have to. Old school tires are made from vulcanized rubber, which can be made by reacting natural rubber from a rubber tree with sulfuric acid and heat. No fossil ‘fuels’ involved.

      • uniquethrowagay@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 day ago

        Bikes are incredibly cheaper than cars, cars need new tires more often, car tires are way more expensive, you can make tires without fossil oil. I’m not sure I get your point. What was your point?

    • Fafa@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 day ago

      Also the extra exercise will prolong your life and you’ll have to pay even more.

      • NottaLottaOcelot@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 day ago

        Longer life means you have to buy more food. That will make a hilarious ad campaign for cars - save money, live shorter

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 day ago

        Probably less than non-cyclists due to better health, so a net negative cost.

        • OwOarchist@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          1 day ago

          Studies have actually been done on this.

          Cyclists do have higher risk of injury from traffic, but the health benefits from the exercise they get more than makes up for it. Cyclists have significantly lower all-around mortality and injury/sickness rates than car drivers.

            • OwOarchist@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              21
              ·
              1 day ago

              This might mean that your bike is the wrong size for you, or you have the seat adjusted too high or too low. Or even that your crank arms are too short or too long for you. You should definitely play around with changing the geometry of your bike and/or try bikes with different geometry. You might find that knee pain goes away once you dial it in correctly.

              Then again, maybe not. Well, if all else fails, you could always get an ebike instead; that should help with knee issues if nothing else does. Though they’re becoming illegal/legally problematic in some jurisdictions now.

              • altkey (he\him)@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 day ago

                I’m passively considering the e-bike option but need to actually look it up, if it’s affordable, thanks.

                I added vertical handle bars and some height to my seat so it’s alright on a plane road, yep. My problems comes from a very rough terrain with hills, sand pockets, no pavement etc I’m forced to use since public roads are tight and have barriers, no curb. 45mx2 per day, 5 days a week was rough, and I was probably pushing myself too hard trying to get in a timeframe comparable to a public transport.

                I wonder if popular ebikes may come in a fitting, rugged variant, that can survive being offroad like MTBs.

                • anomnom@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  24 hours ago

                  Dual suspension e-bikes are kinda pricey, but fat tire ones will handle most of what you mentioned. Those ones unfortunately tend to be more like electric mopeds or dirt bikes though, and are giving e-bikes a bad rep in some circles.

                • OwOarchist@pawb.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  20 hours ago

                  I wonder if popular ebikes may come in a fitting, rugged variant, that can survive being offroad like MTBs.

                  There are actual electric MTBs out there if you look for them, though the real MTB ones tend to be quite pricey.

                  Thankfully, it doesn’t really sound like you need a fully legit MTB. Plenty of ebikes out there on Amazon or whatever that have fat tires and suspension and should be able to handle some light off-road riding.

            • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              21 hours ago

              You should not have any knee strain. Most people ride poorly fitting bikes with the seat too low.

            • NottaLottaOcelot@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              I see more people on scooters these days - maybe that would be gentler on the knees? Roller blades might also help, but I find every crack and bump on the road a source of terror with those

    • hanke@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      You need food regardless if you bike or drive. Maybe just a little more if you are in good trim and bike a lot. Still cheaper than gas for a car though.

    • Anivia@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yeah, ebikes are significantly more economical and ecological. The human body is very inefficient at converting calories into kinetic energy, and producing 1kcal of food has a much worse CO2 output than even burning 1kcal worth of coal. Even if you follow a vegan diet

      It still beats driving a car by a long shot though

      • balsoft@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 hours ago

        The human body will burn calories pretty much either way, and if you let your body adjust to daily riding your resting energy use will go down. If you want to be healthy you need exercise either way. Given all that you can consider the energy required to ride a bicycle for a medium distance daily to be virtually free.

        • Anivia@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          if you let your body adjust to daily riding your resting energy use will go down

          No, that’s just a lie. The only way you’re gonna significantly reduce your BMR from daily bike riding is if you were a fatty and lost weight due to it, but a diet would accomplish the same job. If an untrained person starts commuting daily with their bike the exact opposite will happen, they will grow more muscles in their calves and quads, which will significantly increase the amount of calories they passively burn, and that’s on top of the energy you burn while riding the bicycle.

          You don’t need to make up bullshit to justify commuting with a bicycle, it will absolutely increase the amount of calories you will need to eat, but that’s a low price to pay for the money you save not commuting with a car, let alone the health benefits

          • balsoft@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            You are right, I was working with outdated info. Just last year there was a study that showed the body doesn’t compensate metabolically for the exercise and the added calorie burn is not offset by conservation elsewhere. I can’t find the source of my misconception, but I guess it was widespread enough that they ran a study to disprove it.

  • Trebuchet@europe.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    23 hours ago

    If you’re on mastodon and like dad jokes, puns and thai recipes, Natasha is a good follow

    • NottaLottaOcelot@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      You’re making perfection the enemy of good. Nobody said bikes themselves were free - everything requires some maintenance and parts.

      And if we are comparing bike tires to car tires, they are still a lower volume of petroleum based rubber, and cheaper (especially given that you need two rather than four). A new bike tire is generally anywhere between $50-100, so that’s $100-200 to change the pair you are riding. And new car tires are about $150-250 depending on brand and size, so that’s $600-$1000.