I don’t…

… but alot happened since then

POV: Every triangle is a love triangle if you really love triangles

WTF is this mess? Twitter, reddit and what even is the last one?

Violence against the ruling class has no place in politics

This feels like a mandelaeffect. I could swear it’s more than a decade already

“… son”

I don’t know if this factors in but my rhesus factor is positive

Sure, this is nature! Sleep sheeps will believe this. If you don’t get it after this image, I don’t know, you’re just lost the the system propaganda. Wake up!
c/birdsarentreal

He speaks German, he can’t be a bad person

You don’t hate Mondays, you hate capitalism

Same with landlord and boss.

Which makes me realize: We tip our landlords but not our friends. Makes you think.

Totally AI generated

Sigma meme

Am I good enough to have impostor syndrome?

Well, there is a whole anti intellectual movement within anarchism which stems at least in part from a critique of intellectuals as an elite. That said, there are elitist Marxist and even ML uni professors, but also anarchist ones. I wouldn’t draw the line there.

There is a whole debate within anarchism whether to use the term democracy or not. People on both sides of this semantical debate will have identical utopias but call them differently. Zoe Baker has a video essay about that on YouTube.

I like the term Direct Democracy since it shows my disagreement with parliamentary democracy while still using a term that’s regarded as positive. “Our democracy isn’t direct enough” will resonate with more people than “Democracy bad, anarchy good”.

I didn’t intend to start the discussion here. You are on lemmy.world. maybe filter “local” and you will see.

Important for this discussion is that the moderators reacted to the criticism and acted upon it.

That’s a very good question. It’s as anarchist as modern social media gets.

The thing is the moderators. In an anarchist utopia, they would take turns, be recallable and have to justify their decisions.

The last point is true for some instances but not all (think of the vegan cat food debate on .world verses how .ml blocks voices critical of China and Russia).

The other two points – to my knowledge – barely happen. This isn’t a huge problem, as I said, it’s as anarchist as social media comes. But it contains the risk of a centralized power. Sure, you can always leave the instance (even easier than on mastodon where you lose your followers) but this resembles the Libertarian “freedom” to choose your oppressor. Internal equality is very important.

This isn’t to criticize Lemmy. It’s overall very good and as anarchist as realistically and practically possible. But to showcase the anarchist ideal of councils and to spotlight the minor flaws we should be aware of, even if there is no perfect solution.

That’s why it’s important to keep the rules non coercive

I’m not sure what makes you think of (right wing) libertarians. I specified the absence of authority. Libertarians are fond of the idea of voluntary contracts – or let’s rather call it voluntary authority – which in effect is never voluntary. You can choose for whom to work but there is a ruling class you have to work for. All you can do is choose your oppressor.

Free association among equals on the other hand is a very common idea among (left/socialist) anarchists and I think very early on. You can choose and leave the community you belong to.