He’s allergic to cats, and cats usually sleep on the couch…
…
…you can see where I’m going with this.
Oh man that dude is a heterosectional predator, for real
I’ve never seen so many people just ignore the double entendre of this whole conversation.
I doubt JD Vance cares about pleasuring women though, so he isn’t interested in eating them out
That’s what the Haitians are for.
I see we’re doing some better numbers over here in showerthoughts!
Thanks for the tip
Just seemed like a more appropriate fit. As I’m sure we’ve all thought about good ol’ JD eating house pets whilst in the shower. When we aren’t thinking about sultry couches, anyways.
Of course, we already know he’s an illegal alien from space. He only married his wife because she already had children he could claim were his own. In truth, he sleeps in a separate room with the chaise lounge he’s currently with.
He hasn’t denied it!
I’m just asking questions!
yes.
well, ok then.
RFK wants to feed your pet to his falcon
He’s mad that they won’t let him fuck their sofas.
It’s always projection with these people so you may be on to something here.
I take it you’ve never seen what kind of damage and desecration a cat can do to a couch?
Don’t ask him about the fate of his first love. Its still a tenders spot. No amount of upholstery will remove that damage.
JD Vance is a closeted childless cat lady pass it on
The cats take valuable couch space
No. And he’s not just mad at cat ladies.
This whole idea that people with biological children are more invested in the future of the country than those without kids is just a thinly disguised dog whistle that’s firmly rooted in misogyny and homophobia.
This is a line that theoretically doesn’t precisely and specifically just target homosexuals, there’s also “collateral damage” to infertile couples and those who choose to go child-free. And there’s a sufficient number of those people that it serves as the basis for plausible deniability. That they specifically call out “cat ladies” fully reflects the misogynistic aspects of it. But make no mistake, this is undeniably a basis they might use to deny rights to the LGBT+ community.