• DarkCloud@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Not really, proxy wars have been fought with multiple nations before.

    … practically everyone was in Syria… Russia, Iran, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Armenia, Qatar, The USA, ISIS, Al-queda, and Syrian forces.

    • Pennomi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      Not exactly a proxy war when Russian troops are personally in Ukraine. That’s just a war.

      • Skua@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        The Korean War had over a million NATO troops and also tens of thousands of Soviet troops and, somehow, remained a proxy war. A particularly bloody one, but there was still no actual open full-scale warfare between NATO and the Warsaw Pact. Even China and America remained officially at peace, despite making up the majority of the forces on each side

          • Skua@kbin.earth
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            4 months ago

            Apologies, I was using “NATO troops” as a shorthand for the large number of countries involved rather than the specific command structure. You are right to bring that up

      • intensely_human@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        It’s not a proxy war between Russia and the US. It’s a proxy war between China and the US.

        Russia and Ukraine are the pawns

      • DarkCloud@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        It’s a proxy war because the two major powers are fighting in an area neither of them own.

        Iraq was a proxy war, even though US troops were there.