You had one job…

    • Neato@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      62
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      They are required to be in other countries. At some point we decided red was ok and there’s so many problems with that!

        • EatATaco@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          I’m 100% on board with the us moving to metric, and in almost all cases I think it’s far easier to use.

          But fahrenheit is more intuitive: 100 too hot to work outside, 0 too cold to work outside. It’s just garbage for scientific use. I couldn’t care less if we switched to Celsius, but it’s problem is certainly not intuitiveness.

          I would say intuitiveness is more for all of the other measurements. Like 5280 feet in a mile? WTF is that BS.

        • dan@upvote.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          7 months ago

          Fahrenheit isn’t too bad IMO. It’s more granular so it’s usually sufficient to use whole numbers for everything. 0F to 100F is a temperature range a person might be subjected to in day-to-day life, with 0F being pretty cold and 100F being pretty hot.

          • thepreciousboar@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            I never undertand the more granular, the scale is in 180 because that’s the most precision they could use to manufacture scientific thermometers, nowadays it’s completely irrelevant. Celsius thermometers have a granularity of 0.1°C and that is useful soley when you want to differentiate between “almost a slight fever” and “maybe a slight fever”. Do you find yourself needing to differentiate between 45 °F and 46 °F?

      • setVeryLoud(true);@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        7 months ago

        Amber has been scientifically proven to be easier to notice, and mildly safer than using the same bulb as the brake light to indicate a turn.

        Here’s a paper on it. https://crashstats.nhtsa.dot.gov/Api/Public/ViewPublication/811115

        This paper contains data relating to the effectiveness of amber turn signals by comparing striking and struck cars with the same configuration (amber or red), and the odds of not getting struck with an amber turn signal equipped vehicle is always about 4-8% better than otherwise.

        • EatATaco@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          Thanks for this. I see so many people here talking like it’s obvious, but I’ve never been confused by a turn signal. I’m curious to read this.

          • thepreciousboar@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            7 months ago

            Unless you have some kind of color blindness, orange is among the most noticeable colors to the human eyes, especially in an urban background

            • joel_feila@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              it more just the training, from 20 plus years of driving, and looking out for red and orange but yellow colors.

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      7 months ago

      Don’t blame us, Mini has been owned by BMW for decades.

      Good thing we stopped them in WW2. That flag in the indicator would have been even more confusing.

      • Etterra@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        7 months ago

        I think you’re confused on who stopped them. Here’s a hint, it was America and Russia. Personally I agree with Patton however, we shouldn’t have stopped in Berlin. Oh well.

        • Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          *Shows up late, almost in the wrong jersey*

          *Team is finally whole, barely wins because of enemy blunder*

          ”Look at us win this for the team!

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Personally I agree with Patton however, we shouldn’t have stopped in Berlin.

          Yeah, not enough draftees had died yet.

      • berkeleyblue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        64
        ·
        8 months ago

        The bigger issue is that the US still alows Blinkers to be the same color as break lights. Just weird to me.

        • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          8 months ago

          Actually, Us law/regulations require them to be amber or yellow.

          But like with super-bright headlamps; manufacturers decided to ignore it because USDoT is pretty useless in that regard.

          • XeroxCool@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            25
            ·
            8 months ago

            That’s not correct. FMVSS 108, Table I-a, specifically allows rear turn signals to be amber or red. Front turn signals must be amber only.

      • MrJameGumb@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        8 months ago

        I guess… It’s still a big blinking light on either side of the car I hardly think it’s going to confuse anyone

        • Clasm@ttrpg.network
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          Have you seen the idiots out on the road these days?

          However, as far as turn signals go, this is one of the less egregious designs. Car manufacturers are given too much leeway in what is allowed for such systems, like putting them between headlights or making them use the same circuits as the brake lights instead of a dedicated light.

        • Signtist@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          8 months ago

          Yeah, I could see it being an issue for some less-common type of indicator, but everyone who drives knows what a blinker looks like. Nobody would mistake it for anything other than the right hand turn signal.

          Hell, I wouldn’t even notice the shape of the light; all you need to notice while driving is the presence of a flashing light on the right side of the vehicle - if you’re looking intently enough to notice the shape of the light, you’re not paying enough attention to everything else on the road.

        • 📛Maven@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          Now imagine it in, say, fog, or a storm, or any other low-visibility condition. You can see the vague outline of a car 20 feet ahead, and a blinking arrow pointing to the right, but not in line with where a right blinker should be.

          • MrJameGumb@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            If visibility was that low then you wouldn’t even see an arrow. It would just look like a red blinking blob up ahead.

    • Annoyed_🦀 @monyet.cc
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      8 months ago

      Multiple wrong. The brake light double as a turn signal, the signal colour itself being red, and the arrow pointing at different direction.

      In a saner world, signal and brake light will always be separated and must be the colour of amber.

    • exanime@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      It’s the right turning light… In the shape of an arrow pointing left

      • setVeryLoud(true);@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        I think you two are too European to understand this.

        The US and Canada allows blinking a brake light to act as a turn signal. It’s absolutely stupid, I know.

        • soggy_kitty@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          Although it’s dumb, it doesn’t rule out the theory. But yes America is… Something

          • setVeryLoud(true);@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            It’s the exact pace of a turn signal, it’s how they work over here.

            It’s also not a bulb, but an LED tail light.

          • dan@upvote.au
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            A lot of countries require indicators to be amber. The fact that they can be red in the USA is weird.

            • EatATaco@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              Everyone is shitting on this but Im 46 years old and can’t remember a single time I’ve ever been confused by a turn signal.

              I can see why the regulation makes sense, because if one is out it might look like someone tapping their breaks is turning. But in both cases it’s a warning someone is slowing down and I can’t come up with a situation where they would have right of way that this would make sense.

              So it seems like something that matters so little.

              • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                7 months ago

                It’s about cognitive load. When you’re driving you want reduced cognitive load so you want things to be as unambiguous as possible.

                It’s a difference between reading a shop sign as you drive past as a passenger and reading a shop sign as you drive past as a driver. You’re focusing mostly on the driving so you don’t have extra brain capacity to read the sign.

                Same thing here, you are focusing on driving so you don’t have extra brain capacity to work out what the person in front of you is doing. If you’re used to it it’s fine, but if you’re not used to it it’s dangerous.

                • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  focusing on driving so you don’t have extra brain capacity to work out what the person in front of you is doing

                  That’s a huge part of driving, people not paying attention to the cars in front of them has gotten a car totaled while I’m waiting at a red light, and a bumper bent while I was waiting at a turn without a light. In both cases I was stopped where I was supposed to be, the people behind me were not paying attention to the cars in front of them, and so they hit me.

              • Buffaloaf@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                7 months ago

                Also, I lot of American cars do have amber turn signals. I don’t know why people are acting like they have to be red. But yeah, a blinking light is pretty noticable regardless of what color it is.

  • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    I just like to tell the Americans that this is your fault. You have lacks traffic laws that allow this kind of thing. This isn’t be legal in the UK.

    • whome@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      They look like this here in Germany, sure there was the brexit but do you really have s different version?

        • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 months ago

          Yeah regardless of what the above guy says I’m pretty positive separate indicators are actually EU mandate that the UK still follows because it turns out most EU laws are actually sensible, who knew.

          • Obi@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            I think they just meant that the rear tail lights have the union jack and didn’t realize they were talking about the amber indicators.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        I thought it was an EU law but maybe not. All indicators have to be separate lights, you can’t flash the brake light like that. It must be a proper indicator light.

        So here they have the same basic look for the lights, i.e. the union jack effect, but that LED panels and they kind of pulse in the direction of the indication so it’s much less confusing, they don’t just flash on and off.

    • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      Lax* short for “relaxed.”

      Not trying to be a dick, just took me a minute going “how does one ‘have lacks,’ one can ‘have a lack of,’ one can ‘lack,’ but ‘have lacks?!’ OHHHH.” Lol

  • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Is it not valid to hang the Union Jack vertically, like a pennant? Mini could have just designed each light to be a complete flag, made the same reference, and not have everyone point and laugh at them.

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      I honestly think this qualifies you to be part of their design team. Clearly you have a smarter take on at least one design question, paper qualifications or no.

  • Dog@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    It’s supposed to represent the union jack. I understand how it could be frustrating though.

    • feedum_sneedson@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Right, I didn’t even realise what the problem was supposed to be. But it’s still a bit of a shit indicator.

      • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        I actually think it’s left. The blinking light is on the side turned into, even if it just happens to be shaped like an arrow pointing right.

        • feedum_sneedson@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          I’m just looking at the thumbnail, is it reversed in the video? The indicator is on the right side of the car in that picture. You’re right, it’s shaped like an arrow, which I can’t believe was missed during development.

  • cosmicrookie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    7 months ago

    You could say that about anything that’s broken though. … this isn’t a deflect caused by prioritising style to something else

          • cosmicrookie@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            Ok ok. … i think that I understand the issue now … people recognize an arrow instead of just looking at the lights.

            • RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              It’s just confusing, especially with the split second decision making involved in driving 2 ton objects at high speeds. It’s terrible design.

        • btr_fan87@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          It’s not broken. It’s indicating a left turn, but the left blinker looks like an arrow pointing to the right. That’s a mixed message. It’s meant to look like the Union Jack, but that caused mixed messaging so it’s a problem caused by mixed messaging.