• BorgDrone@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    159
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    This is misleading. The 49.5% tax in the Netherlands is on income above €75,518. Billionaires rarely make the bulk of their money as income.

    We don’t have a capital gains tax, instead there is a tax on capital that’s based on expected return on that capital. It’s about 1% on money in bank account and about 6% on stock and other investments.

    • Yrt@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      63
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Same for Germany. It’s income taxes (everything above ~66k/year is 42% taxes and everything above ~277k/year is 45%) no capital gains taxes (they are 25% no matter the amount of capital gains) or asset taxes. Don’t know where the 47% are coming from.

    • multifariace@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Also misleading, the US gives trillions of tax dollars to the wealthy who are paying nothing. Usually it is in corporate welfare, but a couple years ago they were paid directly.

    • Blaat1234@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      The expected return part is the main tax on billionaires. With capital gain you can hold on forever and never get taxed, and if you die you completely skip capital gains tax with inheritance. Effective tax rate is near zero. This trick obviously only works for people who don’t need their invested money, buy and never ever sell.

      Compare that to NL’s tax. Invested? You pay 6.17% x 32% = 1.97% on your investment account, immediately, no deferral possible, year after year. And the rate went up to 36% in 2024 to reduce passive income’s rate advantage over income from work.

    • nymwit@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Would that mean that if something was not continually growing in value you’d end up paying the value of it in taxes over some amount of years? Does this encourage people to pay the tax value out of the asset or just divest from non appreciating assets? If you paid taxes from the value of the asset I guess it’d be like a series converging to zero over time? Like 6% of 100 is 6, the 6% of 94 is 5.64, 6% of 88.36, vs. paying 6 bucks every year. Slower but sort of an eroding effect - like paying society’s subscription fee for how you got the value in the first place!

    • Kidplayer_666@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      8 months ago

      Taxing expected return sounds a bit absurd. What if the capital turns out to be lost, does the state give the tax back?

      • AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        8 months ago

        Greed should be punished, pro-social vocations rewarded.

        Greed is a an antisocial force more effective in its destruction than even hatred.

      • BorgDrone@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        In practice it means that the rich pay very little tax. It’s been an ongoing debate for years, and changes are being worked on to tax actual gains.

        • Kidplayer_666@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          8 months ago

          Dude, I have much of my savings for retirement invested in stocks (ETF’s, it’s a fairly safe investment) since the social security in my country kinda sucks. My return on investment is 5% a year. Having a 6% tax actually means I lose money

  • GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    129
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Wow, this is just entirely wrong. Completely and utterly wrong.

    Sweden has a maximum of around 55% income tax bracket if you’re in a municipality with high income tax, but billionaires never are and as such would be taxed probably at most 50% income tax bracket.

    This is of course entirely irrelevant because billionaires don’t make their money on income. Sweden has fairly low capital gains taxes - 30% on regular accounts, and a special account that taxes the whole account value by a low percentage, which shakes out in average years to even lower taxes on capital. This assumes you even keep your capital in the country, which is a big if.

    There’s also no inheritance tax, no gift tax and no property tax. Sweden is actually an unusually good place to be a billionaire as far as taxation goes, and a below average place to earn a high salary as far as taxation goes.

      • GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        57% is the tax on “one-time gains” - bonuses and other such things.

        This means that you’re probably overpaying on it, but you might also be underpaying on your income taxes (usually ~30% even if you reach the ~50%-tax bracket). Worst case scenario, you’ve lent some money interest-free to the government that you get back on your tax returns.

        • Fenrisulfir@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          You can borrow from someone else. When someone else borrows from you, you lend it. Or lent as the past tense

          • GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            8 months ago

            Thanks, updated. I think my mistake stems from Swedish only having one word for the concept, regardless of the direction of the transaction.

          • lemmyseikai@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            Ish…

            They could have said “you have let the government borrow from you tax free.”

            But yeah, the general idea holds.

      • TheBeege@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        44
        ·
        8 months ago

        Correct, but there are those that would take this as a source of truth and run with it. It’s not the smart thing to do, but we already see people doing this sort of behavior on other social media.

        We shouldn’t enable the problem, even if it’s an innocent mistake

        • cosmicrookie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          14
          ·
          8 months ago

          The point of the meme is to highlight that rich people should be taxed more

          You can’t include bracket taxing, asset taxing etc in a commit meme format.

          If people get their facts off memes, they indeed have a problem but you can’t accommodate for all who arent critical of their knowledge sources

          • GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            8 months ago

            I don’t buy this argument - if you’re going to claim something to be the case, it should at least vaguely resemble the truth. Going by the ‘rules’ of this meme, Sweden should be right next to the U.S, or even take the U.S’ place given that the U.S ranks better on wealth equality (not income equality where Sweden ranks better).

            We should absolutely tax billionaires more. We should make memes about it to spread the word. We should also make those memes at least kind of accurate.

            To understand one significant downside of this - Swedes reading this meme might think that we don’t have a billionaire-taxation problem in our country. That’s actively harmful to the cause.

  • mellowheat@suppo.fi
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    64
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Billionaires in Europe “evade” taxes just like every other billionaire. Most of their wealth is assets, which is why their tax rates don’t seem right if you don’t understand how economics works.

  • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    8 months ago

    Meanwhile in Hungary: if you’re a large business, you pay less tax by percentage than small businesses and self-employed people.

      • Dicska@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        8 months ago

        I think #1 in the EU and some strong place somewhere in the top 5 in Europe. It’s gotten SO much worse in the past 10-15 years… And not like it was good before that, to begin with.

        • Gabu@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          8 months ago

          Oh yeah, I’m aware - I had plans to move to Hungary, to get to know my ancestors’ homeland. Completely scrapped it and won’t even think about visiting until Orbán’s head in on a pike and his whole party of cronies is exiled.

    • Iceblade@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 months ago

      The 55% rate is only on wage income (and the real upper tax rate on wages is more like 66% anyway, if you include payroll tax).

      Capital gains tax is 30%, and that’s only on realized gains AFAIK - which is shockingly close to the base payroll tax (25%).

      The hardest taxed people here are the middle class, since they get their income as wages, whilst upper class tax rates are significantly lower, with more of their income being from capital gains.

  • mozz@mbin.grits.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    8 months ago

    We’ve been giving ours billions more dollars that we took from the plebs so they’ll be nice to us

    No they’ve never been nice to us, why do you ask?

  • terwn43lp@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    blegh who needs free healthcare, education, worker’s rights, and social services. i enjoy living check to check like 60% of Americans

  • Fried_out_Kombi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    I’m personally in favor of land value taxes, externality taxes, and natural resource severance taxes.

  • ChicoSuave@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    This means Swedish billionaires work harder than any other billionaires in the world to maintain their status as a billionaire. American billionaires are lazy.

    • MMNT@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      No they don’t. They have their special loopholes to evade taxes. Nothing is as black and white. Have a look at Spotify, their profit and how many people they fired.