• Chainweasel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    10 months ago

    So wait, is “Lord of” anything a violation of the copyright or is it just words that rhyme with “rings”?
    Either way it seems pretty ridiculous.

  • YurkshireLad@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    10 months ago

    What about “Lord of the Fries”? If that one doesn’t get shutdown then neither should this one.

    • Ech@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      Don’t have much knowledge of NZ laws, but they certainly have a vested interest in keeping the Tolkien estate happy. Whether they have prior laws to support that, or there was pressure from the top in this case, it tracks that the lawsuit ended like this.

    • abbotsbury@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      I don’t think a food truck counts as satire. Satire is like the “Bored of the Rings” Lampoon book from the '70s, it actually had something to say regarding the material it was satirical of.

      I may be underestimating the satirical capacity of a food truck, or maybe the legal definition of satire in NZ, but to me it’s just a cheeky name.

  • Erasmus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    10 months ago

    Ehhh…I could see this if it was book or reading related or if they are using a Wizard or the like eating wings in their logo.

    But otherwise this is a far stretch.

  • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    I want to say this was an obvious outcome. But I guess it is an unrelated industry. However I don’t buy that you come up with lord of the wings and think that it’s so original and so unrelated and so obviously has to do wth lordship and royalty.