Ah, true. Black masking tape?

Masking tape should work fine and is much easier to tear, fwiw.

Afaik, there’s currently no instance-neutral way to link to a post unfortunately. As for the link icon, that’s used to turn part of a comment into a link without posting the whole url for space and/or aesthetic reasons. Like this.

Also, it looks like there’s still an issue on the Lemmy-UI with that url. I wonder what’s up with that.

Something about hyperlinking a link twice seems to have messed with it, at least on my end. I’d suggest just posting the link as is without the formatting.

Guess I’m bringing tape with me on flights now.

*Since I looked it up for myself: How to Find Hidden Cameras on wikiHow. Specifically for IR lights, method 2 is particularly noteworthy.

Where in the post did it say anything about ads?

Ah, yes. I knew that “Howdy, howdy, howdy” sounded familiar, hah.

This is a point I don’t see brought up enough. The amount of effort and money spent by corps to discredit unions should be the only proof people need to see they’re in their best interest.

Same holds true for any legislation corps fight tooth and nail against. Their only concern is their bottom line. If they’re spending millions on something, it’s cause it’ll save them billions.

“Cope” lol. Take some time offline. You obviously need it.

While I appreciate data, nothing I see at a glance is very supportive of an incumbent potus dropping out being a good idea. I dont have much time to dig into it right now, but of the two incumbents they highlight in the article, both were VPs that assumed the office after an assassination, and in both elections, the incumbent party lost the white house. Neither are particularly similar to the situation in 2024, nor do they suggest that pulling the incumbent would be a good idea.

Harris’ takeover has been an an absolute success, but anyone claiming they knew it’d work out this way is lying or delusional. Just because we hit the low percentage chance that it all worked out doesn’t mean people were wrong for thinking it was most likely a bad idea because all available history and information basically assured that it was.

That said, anyone that got vitriolic about it (on either side, tbf) can get bent. This is all uncharted waters right now. Being a dick about it either way isn’t helping anything. Let’s not pretend to know that anything is certain.

Not OP, but just a boiler plate response would be fine for me. “Sorry [insert name here]. You are no longer being considered for this position. (Optional) Good luck on other applications”. Could even have it set up to sends those out automatically.

Literal “dog caught the car” moment.

Hah, kinda.

Lol, fair. Didn’t click through to read it.

“Bag toss” lol

Satire site doesn’t wanna say cornhole?

I use lemmy-ui, yeah.

This is what I see for a banned community

vs

What I see normally

Pretty sure I just got banned from c/vegan because I downvoted “wrong”. Haven’t interacted in any other way, so not sure what else it could be. Also recently got banned from c/imageai for downvoting “too much”? This is a weird trend that seems like a bad path for Lemmy to go down if it’s starting to become the norm.

*Also, what’s up with not being able to block a community you’re banned from? They don’t want you there but you’re forced to view their content? That makes no sense.

It’s simultaneously very depressing and also relieving to see it taken seriously after last time.

Oh wow. They made an emoji of Charlie Kirk?