• CountSheep@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s more that they’re not allowed to just give it to Tesla. The transportation authority only gives it to postnord and postnord is not giving it to tesla customers or tesla. The injunction allows the transportation authority to give it tesla directly if they come and get it.

    Typical boot licker mentality though seeing the Unions here as the bad guys, when 90% of Swedish workers all have a CBA which is what the tesla workers are asking for. It’s in the unions right to deny service. The real issue is whether or not a government can refuse, and in this case the current injunction says the Swedish Government cannot.

    • ExaminatorPrime@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      “Muh BoootTTSss”, you are wrong bro. And the Swedish court seems to agree that you are wrong. Again, you can’t just take goods people paid for away indefinitely and keep them hostage until everyone bends the knee and does what you want. That is theft. The problem here is that the union does not allow Tesla or the customers themselves to come over and take the plates, which are their property. Being in a labour union or Swedish does not magically give you the right to steal from others.

    • RedundancyDoneWell@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The transportation authority only gives it to postnord and postnord is not giving it to tesla customers or tesla. The injunction allows the transportation authority to give it tesla directly if they come and get it.

      Incorrect. You are conflating the transportation authority with the plate manufacturer.

      The plate manufacturer only gives it to Postnord, because the transport authority has told them so.

      The injuction orders the transport authority to allow the plate manufacturer to give the plates to Tesla.