• Agloe_Dreams@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I mean, if you are after a fast EV, it lost it’s quickest EV bragging rights to the model S Plaid that Tesla then self-crashed their own prices with massive discounts. Like, the plaid is $89,000. That small price gets you a much better model S today than it was when the Taycan launched. The Lucid Air is right there around original Taycan prices and is a more luxurious car. The reasons you would buy one at $200k are running out. Sure, the Taycan is a better driving experience…but the other sales points are gone. What would anyone expect?

    • 007meow@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Plaid beats Taycan in a straight line.

      Taycan beats Plaid in like every other metric (except range, of course), unless you’re a professional driver and hitting the Nurburgring as your daily commute.

    • Oo__II__oO@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Absoultely agree. Porsche is pivoting more on the Taycan being a sports sedan more tuned for handling, as opposed to a luxury EV that can accelerate like a sports car.

      The problem is if you have money for a Taycan, then you also have money for a true sports car. Then you find other EVs have better luxury features, and way more usable daily functionality.

      • Nefilim314@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Man, is it simply impossible for r/cars to ever acknowledge that some people are not 28-year-old single men and need more practicality in a car than what a coupe provides, but more sportiness than what an SUV provides?

        I own a Taycan and I specifically chose it over the competition because I enjoy driving, but I also need to carry my kids and their stuff around. I don’t want a numb-feeling bank vault Audi and a 911’s back seat isn’t going to cut it.

        And yes, I know I could afford TWO cars for the money, but I also work remote. The ONLY time I get to drive is going to get groceries, go to doctors appointments, and occasionally go pick up take-out. I don’t have time for track days, auto cross events, or entire day canyon carving sessions. So, I need a car that makes the most mundane chores as exciting as possible. That’s what this car does.

      • strongmanass@alien.topB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The problem is if you have money for a Taycan, then you also have money for a true sports car.

        If you have money for a Taycan then what you want is likely an EV, so the sports cars don’t matter. If interior design and quality are high up the list then the Model S is probably also not a serious consideration. That leaves the Taycan’s cousin in the e-Tron GT, and the Lucid Air Sapphire. Reviews suggest the Lucid is better but I can understand why one would be hesitant to buy from them because they’re far from established. And as for the Audi, it’s like asking if you want a navel orange or a tangerine. The Taycan still has a place IMO, but two years from now when the Lotus and Polestar competitors hit the market that could be a very different story.

    • DeeYumTofu@alien.topB
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I hate this stupid argument because Porsche has never been about their 0-60. You buy Porsche because they are one of the best handling cars in the market and the driving experience is unparalleled. I haven’t personally driven a Taycan but from what I’ve read it drives like every other Porsche and that in itself beats anything a Tesla can provide. The only sales point you need is that it’s a Porsche. Why do you think people still buy 911s when there are faster 0-60s at the price?