• ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 day ago

    Goon literally started out as the big nosed henchmen of the sea hag in the Popeye comic strip in the 1930s. It got applied to refer to anti-union fighters very quickly before it became a general purpose word meaning low-level henchman.

  • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    2 days ago

    I miss when gay means happy.

    Okay I’m not that old but i had a boss who said he’s old enough to remember when gay literally means happy.

    For me, my little pet peeve is when society changed the meaning of ironic to mean joking or satirical.

    • M137@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yeah, you did hire goons, but you wanted gooners… And who is that to right one supposed to be? How is a maffia boss some dude with what looks like an assassin cloak with “Evil” written on it?

  • Ech@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    70
    ·
    2 days ago

    And grok used to mean “understand”, not “nazi shithead propaganda machine”.

    • Cease@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yeah no sorry the origin was always gross. Stranger in a strange land is just heinlein’s weird fetish porn where he justifies old men sleeping with young girls (sound familiar?)

      And grok was always a term used by weirdos who thought the book was deep for some crazy reason and wanted to sound like they were part of this insider intellectuals club

      • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        13 hours ago

        What? He gets freaky in some other books, but Stranger is pretty clean for a free love manifesto. Every character I can think of was a full grown adult, I don’t think there’s a single scene even euphemistically depicting an old man sleeping with a young girl. All the sex even referred to was between people of relatively close age.

        Grok just means to understand/drink fully. You drink water, and it becomes a part of your body. You understand an idea, and it becomes part of your mind. It’s an efficient word to communicate “understanding something fully enough to functionally incorporate it into your worldview”. It’s not that intellectual.

      • AlteredEgo@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        That’s a rather puritan and skewed perspective. Afaik Stranger in a Strange Land is a very weird book but very tame and not pornographic at all. And it was an important artwork that explored the themes of the 60s sexual revolution. A time where people knew very little about sex and gender and questioned everything.

      • KingOfSleep@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Please don’t interpret this as a defense of Robert Heinlein’s books as it has been decades since I read them and it sounds like you might be more familiar with them. But weren’t all the women in Stranger in a Strange Land older than Michael Valentine Smith?

        Are you confusing the character with Lazarus Long from Time Enough for Love, et al? I think he was thousands of years older than some of his (adult) love interests…

      • Ech@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        I dunno. I only ever used it as shorthand for being able to understand the basics of something. Also, words can change for the better. So in this case it went gross -> fine -> gross.

    • naught101@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I’m going to keep using it as a verb. If people are dumb enough to assume I’m dumb enough to use xai, that’s not my problem.

  • DEJED@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Do you all remember the movie “The Goonies”? Yeah… so many levels of wrong with this new definition when applied to that movie

          • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            20 hours ago

            There are old reviews calling that scene out when the movie was new.

            edit: I’m looking for the review, but there’s so many modern reviews, that finding a scanned new paper article from 1984 is difficult.

            Another example of people knowing Revenge of the Nerds ain’t right was Real Genius. The creative crew was hired by the studio to make their own Revenge of the Nerds, but they hated that movie and made a fixed version.

            There’s some interview with the director of Revenge of the Nerds who defended the rapist as a “complex character.” Utter nonsense. The real concern with all this how obviously fine Hollywood was and still is with rape. What they considered normal seeped into the media they produced and normalized it to the masses watching it.

            On Goonies, the name is fine and isn’t problematic. I saw Inside Job take a swipe at it for how they treated Sloth, but he was sympathetic and his abusers were his family, the villains. The two things that don’t age too well the was the Japanese People Love Gadgets, which considering it was only the one kid and his father, isn’t that bad. It’s pretty reasonable for a son to have the same hobby as his father and tech otakus are a thing. The second is the body shaming the Chunk character, which when recording the scene, made the director so uncomfortable, he paid for a gym membership for the kid. There’s a lot worse movies from the 80s to watch.

          • ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            What’s funny about revenge of the nerds is that no one on set, even the girls, thought anything of that plot point at all at the time. It wasn’t until the 2010s that the backlash against it for that scene became a major sticking point.

            Not to say it was ever acceptable to impersonate someone else to have sex with a girl. That is rape by deception, but movies did have different standards at the time. For example a lot of movies had scenes were children were put in fairly awkward situations that would be scandalous today but at that time the whole ‘children pretending to be adults’ wasn’t seen as a big deal.

            The nostalgia critic in his review of The Chipmunks movie (the 80s one) did bring up that point to explain the mentality behind those scenes at the time.

  • Bluewing@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    And there was a time that gay meant happy and a removed was a piece of fire wood. Though the Brits, in their usual word butchery, turned that into fag for cigarette.

    Languages change and morph. They are living things. And despite the French’s best effort to try and prevent it.

    • calcopiritus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      Did you self-censor? It says “removed” in italics. I don’t know what a piece of fire wood could be called to be so offensive to self-censor

    • GiveOver@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      We used it to mean cigarette before yanks turned it into a slur. You’re the butchers here!

      • Bluewing@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        You butchered your own word removed to get fag. And who eats veg? And soccer that the US gets blamed for. We got it from you! Mangling words is what Brits do because they are orally lazy!

        *****For those without a sense of humor, this is meant in fun.

        • Lennny@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          So lazy and yet wanting to be respected. Oh we don’t eat cows. That’s for the poors, we eat beef.

          Bunch of fuckin tea sippin wankers. But for the brits sake, words ending in re instead of er does look better to me. Theatre over theater. Colour is more colorful of a spelling…

          Regarding the gays, didn’t they use to burn gay people which is why the term connected from bundle of sticks to gay people? And probably why we use flamer as well, now that I think about it.

          • Bluewing@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            We raise cows. We eat beef even if we are poor, we don’t discriminate. Well, up until the prices these days. It’s going back to being a rich person’s supper. Much to the joy of Vegans. But even cow is better than beouf or it’s variations.

            re vs. er? bloody silent letters again. Colour looks like a wannabe upjump word. And there is the whole silent letter thing again.

            Those crude heathens probably hanged them the majority of the time vs burn. Wood costs money and takes time. A rope is cheap and faster plus it’s reusable and fits their attitude.

    • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      makes languages sound kinda gay, all that morphing and changing.

      next you’ll be telling me they have formal versions and informal versions too

  • SalamiDommie@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    It is crazy how words change meaning. Surprising that low level mafia muscle was a Goon and now it somehow relates to the euphoria one experiences eating Fast Food Chinese crab rangoons.

    While I love going at a china buffet as much as the next fella - I don’t understand how it became associated with mob henchmen.

  • FluidBeef@quokk.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    Australians think “rooting around” means something very different so you have to be careful not to use it in a work context.