• chickenf622@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      I had to read this like 24 times to make sure I didn’t miss anything, but I’m 98% certain you’re correct. When referring to the individual components it should be chlorine not chloride. I’m not a chemical doctor, but this is my understanding.

      • Phineaz@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        19
        ·
        4 months ago

        Horrible at chemistry, but I’m 98% sure it is chloride - the chlorine is present as an anion, and as such is called chloride. Even if you refer to it as an individual component, you still observe Cl-, not Cl (or rather Cl2).

        • cowfodder@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          46
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          4 months ago

          No, the element is chlorine. Chloride denotes a compound or molecule containing a chlorine ion, or a compound with a non-charged chlorine atom bonded.

          • mars296@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            24
            ·
            4 months ago

            This whole thread is very pedantic but in chemistry when someone refers to chlorine, they are usually referring to Cl2. I think in IUPAC naming chloride is reserved for for ions. Like dichloromethane (IUPAC) and methylene chloride (also common name).

          • Phineaz@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 months ago

            Now I am confused. Mind bearing with me for a sec?

            I was referring to the chlorine present in NaCl, that should in fact be chloride due to it’s anionic nature, should it not? I mean sure it’s pedantic, but I’d still like to know where I went wrong with that thought :D .