• chickenf622@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    I had to read this like 24 times to make sure I didn’t miss anything, but I’m 98% certain you’re correct. When referring to the individual components it should be chlorine not chloride. I’m not a chemical doctor, but this is my understanding.

    • Phineaz@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      19
      ·
      4 months ago

      Horrible at chemistry, but I’m 98% sure it is chloride - the chlorine is present as an anion, and as such is called chloride. Even if you refer to it as an individual component, you still observe Cl-, not Cl (or rather Cl2).

      • cowfodder@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        46
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        4 months ago

        No, the element is chlorine. Chloride denotes a compound or molecule containing a chlorine ion, or a compound with a non-charged chlorine atom bonded.

        • mars296@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          24
          ·
          4 months ago

          This whole thread is very pedantic but in chemistry when someone refers to chlorine, they are usually referring to Cl2. I think in IUPAC naming chloride is reserved for for ions. Like dichloromethane (IUPAC) and methylene chloride (also common name).

        • Phineaz@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          Now I am confused. Mind bearing with me for a sec?

          I was referring to the chlorine present in NaCl, that should in fact be chloride due to it’s anionic nature, should it not? I mean sure it’s pedantic, but I’d still like to know where I went wrong with that thought :D .