• solsangraal@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    139
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    12 days ago

    “let’s get back to talking about how gay books in the library are ruining our kids’ lives!!”

    -GOP

      • Dusktracer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        12 days ago

        Not too hard, the things are often phallic shaped and you gotta stroke its trigger to get it to release its load everywhere. Just saying.

        • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          11 days ago

          Make all guns require the grip to be shaped like a cock so homophobes will refuse to hold them.

          Or even better, they come with a phallus-shaped mouthpiece attached that needs to be sucked on in order to allow the gun to fire…

          I can come up with these all day lol

      • pdxfed@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        11 days ago

        What’s the internet rule that there is porn for everything you can think of? There has to be gun fetish gay porn. All sane Americans need to do is get whoever is more influential than Dan Savage to give the movement legs ala “Santorum”

  • Zip2@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    66
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 days ago

    As a non-American, can I just say: get your shit together and ban guns as you clearly can’t be trusted with them as a country.

    Fully expecting to get downvoted by the “but it’s mah hobby” brigade. Get a new hobby, there’s peoples lives at stake.

      • Dicska@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 days ago

        What makes it easier to get a gun license if I get a drivers license afterwards?

    • allidoislietomyself@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      11 days ago

      The reality of it is we know straight up banning guns is the only way to truly solve this problem. The issue is we like to pretend it is some super complex issue with all this nuance that can only be approached by the best and brightest, but the right people to put that policy together just haven’t come along yet. We tell ourselves that because the truth is we are totally okay with a certain amount of faceless death as long as we can have our toys and we don’t have to clean up the mess.

    • Eyck_of_denesle@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 days ago

      That would never happen because whichever party does it, they can kiss goodbye to victory forever.

    • BobTheDestroyer@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      11 days ago

      We’ve been arguing about this in the US for my whole life, and I’m not young. At this point it should be obvious neither of the two faces of our government has any interest in doing anything more about guns than using the topic as a wedge to divide us and as a source of campaign funding. So you want to ban guns. Is that the hill you want your children to die on? How about instead of insisting that’s the only way, we enact a solution that keeps kids alive and that both the red and blue team can agree on, like, say, mandatory armed guards (a paid job, not volunteers) at school entrances. Is it in conflict with our ideal vision of a peaceful society? Maybe, but it works. Other countries have done it and it stopped school shootings entirely.

    • p5yk0t1km1r4ge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      11 days ago

      And as an American, all i have to say is

      Sure, we will just march on up to the Capitol amidst all the lobbiers and gun obsessed GoP fascists and tell them, “Please stop, someone from lemmy who isn’t even American says that’s all we need to do.”

      If you aren’t American, keep your mouth shut on what we “should” do. Many, many of us are tired of these shootings, and on top of it all, our democracy is at stake, along with our ways of life to boot. Our country is failing, and all we can do is VOTE. It’s not that fucking easy. Stop accusing our entire country of this bullshit like we want it. The majority of us aren’t like this.

  • Facebones@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    12 days ago

    “If only there were 50 more guns for everyone to whip out at the same time with no way of knowing who the shooter is in the sea of guns, that’ll be safer!”

    • Comment105@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 days ago

      I think I’ve read a story or two about the “anti-shooter” getting shot for being at a massacre with a weapon drawn, like some kind of murderer.

      • BruceTwarzen@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 days ago

        Drawing a weapon in public seems insane to me. Even if you are the “good guy with a gun” in the eyes of everyone else, you are a potential murderer.

        • pingveno@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          11 days ago

          That happened at my university, though not to someone affiliated with the university. He was trying to break up a fight. He had a gun and it fell out its holster. He was grabbing for it as campus police were shouting not to. They shot and killed him. While you can argue about whether the police response and training was appropriate, one thing is definitely true. If he had not had a gun on him that day, he would not have been killed. A country awash in guns is not a better country, despite what the “a well armed society is a polite society” people claim.

        • Facebones@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 days ago

          Thats always the thing about gun folk who won’t go to the mailbox without their weapon, right? However they justify it, its inherently this fantasy that they’ll get to shoot somebody. If you’re worried about being prepared, why not a police stick thing, mace, or a tazer maybe? Why does it HAVE to be the hyper lethal super easily reloaded thing or bust?

          In that vein, these are all things cops carry on them too, why do they NEVER use them and go straight for emptying a clip instead of practicing escalation of force?

          The answer? Murder boners. In both cases, its all just a power fantasy of getting to end a life without facing consequences. Sure, a taser will probably make most people drop a gun, but then you dont have the satisfaction of feeling that ultimate power of control over someone else’s life.

          • dessimbelackis@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 days ago

            I also believe zombie movies are a facet of this.

            Oh, what’s that? A human-shaped monster of an excuse to blow a thousand rounds? Extremely American.

            The Purge is the same thing without the window dressing of a monster.

            • Doomsider@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 days ago

              They are probably just priming people to shoot anyone in the head that have been “declared” zombies.

              Hey guys! It turns out all liberals are really zombies. You know what do to.

            • Facebones@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 days ago

              And also both in movies and “prepper” or gun nut rhetoric, survival begins and ends with guns. No gardening, no first aid, no communication techniques, just guns.

  • zabadoh@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    12 days ago

    NRA: If only enough 14 year olds were armed, this could have been prevented…

  • glitchdx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    12 days ago

    My opinions about guns have changed over the years. I used to be of the opinion that nobody should have guns in this day and age, what’s the point aside from ego boosting and sport.

    Then a cheeto puff did a treason on jan6.

    I’ll give up my guns only after the fascists give up theirs. Non negotiable.

    You want to “prevent tragedies”? fund programs for welfare and healthcare. Tax the rich. Break up megacorps like google, albertsons, nestle. Enact and enforce employee protections. Raise the minimum wage. Ban airbnb and heavily tax empty residences. Universal basic income! Did I mention fixing the healthcare system? More that I’m forgetting to list.

    Miserable parents make miserable kids, and miserable kids lash out. For the wealthiest and most powerful nation on the planet, this shouldn’t be hard to figure out.

    • glitchdx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      12 days ago

      also fire every single cop in the country and replace them all with people who actually believe that they’re supposed to protect and serve.

      • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        11 days ago

        The problem is that all of those ex-cops would still exist and still be American citizens. They’d 100% create a far right militia, at the very least. No doubt about it.

        Unless we shipped them off to Russia or something.

    • Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      11 days ago

      That is such stupid logic. “Oh people want to violently overthrow the government? I want them to easily get guns” The fascists should be the exact reason you want to have strict gun control

      • RaoulDook@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 days ago

        It doesn’t work that way when they already all have guns. If you wanted to do it your way, you’d have needed to start on that gun control about 100 years ago.

        Because the cops are not going to take the fascists’ guns, even if they were outlawed. They are vastly outnumbered by armed citizens, and they are scared of them, and many of the cops are the same fascists too.

    • steel_nomad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      19
      ·
      12 days ago

      So much to unpack here. Your last 2 paragraphs are lucid, but the previous 3 are unhinged.

        • glitchdx@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 days ago

          it’s unhinged because of the implication of violence against a specific group of people identified by their political beliefs. And wouldn’t you know it, it’s that same group of people who are opposing all of the solutions I proposed in my previous comment.

          • StupidBrotherInLaw@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            11 days ago

            You and I agree on this topic, I was just curious if the other commenter had anything intelligent to add or if they just instantly resort to insults because they can’t intelligently articulate their viewpoint.

            From you I didn’t see an implication of initiating violence so much as protecting against those whose political beliefs support violence against their out groups. Seems pretty reasonable to me.

    • The Pantser@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      12 days ago

      Yeah those dangerous illegal aliens coming up and killing our families meanwhile the children are killing more of our families than the aliens. Fuck the GOP, and fuck the 2nd amendment.

      • hemmes@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        12 days ago

        I’m far left, but I actually don’t hate on the 2nd Amendment. It was a pivotal moment in US history, fortifying the power of the people and its rule over government.

        But at the time the 2nd Amendment was written, the most powerful weapon that the average person would have had access to was the flintlock musket. The flintlock had a relatively short effective range of around 50 to 100 yards and took time to reload after each shot.

        It would stand to reason that much stronger laws are required to compensate for the amount of fire power available to people now.

  • Lad@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    11 days ago

    School shooters still thinking they’re going to become as infamous as Columbine. They’re just getting added to the huge pile of names.

    Nobody will remember you.

      • stormeuh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        11 days ago

        Also, I don’t think being remembered is the main point. It seems to me to be more about a violent release of frustration and getting back at the people who “wronged” them, usually combined with suicide by cop.

        • Snowclone@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          11 days ago

          Most mass shootings are family annihilations, which typically end in suicide, so I think you’re correct here.

    • griD@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      11 days ago

      > be me
      > doom scrolling international news on my death bed in 2064
      > this article shows up
      > goodbye my old friend

  • TheHarpyEagle@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 days ago

    It’s “funny” that there’s conspiracy theories that these are all liberal psyops to force gun control. Surely the deep state would realize by now that no amount of dead children will change people’s minds.

  • Krackalot@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    12 days ago

    If you take away my unfettered access to guns, how will I support the government when they trample the rights of people I don’t like? /s

  • WoahWoah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    12 days ago

    The new face of violent radicalism in the United States: aggrieved, rural, white “Future Farmers of America” Trump kids raised by white, rural, aggrieved Trump parents that don’t keep their guns secure.

    Edit: yes, he was part of FFA. He was “member of the month” last month.

      • PriorityMotif@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        12 days ago

        I couldn’t believe that they released his name like that. Totally out of line by whatever department decided to do that.

        • jaybone@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          11 days ago

          Yes it’s odd, given how just before this that football player was shot in San Francisco by a 17 year old. There was a big to-do about will he be tried as an adult and they won’t release his name because he’s a minor. In this case they released his name right away and said he would be tried as an adult even though he’s only 14.

          • PriorityMotif@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 days ago

            I think that was a rouge “tough guy” who decided to do it. It’s not up to the police to decide how he gets tried.

  • njm1314@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 days ago

    Must suck to be the person that has to write this every time. Do you think it’s one person or do you think they have to take turns?

    • booly@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 days ago

      I imagine it’s just a form they fill out with a few fields: city, number of shooters, number of dead, number of wounded. The rest of it stays the same each time.