• BlitzoTheOisSilent@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        “High thoughts,” almost like shower thoughts, but driven by weed and, in my experience, learning an interesting fact or tidbit.

        So they’re not a scientist and don’t have formal training in sounds or plants or animals, they learned a fact and got high and connected some dots, haha

        • tetris11@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 month ago

          Gotcha. “I’m not an expert, but I have profound thoughts” is the message

      • pyre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        imagine a shirt that says “I’m not a scientist”. it’s basically that but if you smoke weed you are obligated to tell everyone unprompted, so this is for weed smokers who want a shirt that says I’m not a scientist.

    • SLVRDRGN@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      a further idea: Front of the shirt says “I am not a scientist”

      Back of the shirt says “I just smoke weed”

  • Crackhappy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    83
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Wait… If the plants are whispering to my cat late at night. Is that why the little fucker spazzes out and goes crazy all over the house at 3 am?

  • idiomaddict@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    69
    ·
    1 month ago

    Plants talk? As in rustle with movement or communicate through sound? Can plants hear? The world is amazing, I’ll be on Wikipedia for a few.

    • higgsboson@dubvee.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 month ago

      That’s actually the first time I’ve seen Dr Dog referenced in the wild (outside of Pat Finnerty’s channel.)

      • hydrospanner@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        Also wild seeing this…I had never heard of them till I started dating my gf. She and most of her friends are big fans and I just saw them live a few weeks ago.

  • nifty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    How do we know that sound signals recorded aren’t just from the release of biomolecules? Using the nervous system to produce sound is a more intentional process than the release of biomolecules for chemical signaling, which is something even simple multicellular organism do

    • angrystego@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      1 month ago

      You’re right that it doesn’t have to be talking. But it is a sound cats and dogs can hear. They do hear the plant noise, which is cool.

      • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        It’s cool to us.

        I can absolutely confirm that neither cats nor dogs particularly enjoy hearing multiple frequencies in that range, as I use ultrasonic noisemakers to train dogs and cats. Both species have had specific individuals that reacted as though I had just beaten them, and all the individuals of both species reacted in such a way that it was clear that they would do just about anything to never hear those noises again.

        That being said, I wonder if they could hear that frequency all the time and were freaked out that a human was shouting in plant language.

        • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 month ago

          The unpleasant reaction could be to the shape of the sound rather than just the frequency. Like a sin wave isn’t a pleasant sound, though it’s not bad at lower amplitudes.

          • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 month ago

            Possible. I couldn’t tell you since I can’t hear it, and am uncertain if I have a microphone that could detect that frequency

            • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 month ago

              Do they show similar signs of distress around plants in general? Are they reluctant to enter forests? Do they randomly destroy plants?

              Lol I thought it would be clear until that last question, which is something both cats and dogs are known to do on occasion.

        • bufalo1973@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 month ago

          Maybe it has something to do with the volume. If plants are at, let’s say, 40dB and you blast the animals with a 100 dB sound…

      • nifty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 month ago

        Right, but what’s the source of the sound? If it’s not intentionally produced, but rather a chemical reaction or reaction byproduct, then it says something different about plant communication

        • angrystego@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 month ago

          I agree, I just don’t think it’s that relevant to the post, which was more about how our pets experience the world.

        • BluesF@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          The sounds produced by plants aren’t used for communication, at least as far as I’ve understood it. They are, as you say, just sounds produced as part of other processes. They aren’t talking any more than a tree talks when in creaks in the wind.

  • OpenStars@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 month ago

    “I can hear the innermost thoughts of plants” - yup, sounds crazy to me! (Therefore let’s do it - make it happen!:-)

    • Etterra@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 month ago

      Probably. If astronomers can convert the radio noise stars make into audible sound - and they can - then I don’t see why we couldn’t pitch adjust background noise to human-audible levels.

    • rhandyrhoads@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 month ago

      I’m not 100% on the pitching down bit, but key would be to get a mic that has those frequencies in its range.