I’m personally a big fan of the late TMP designs like the Excelsior and Centaur, what do you guys like?

  • Voyager763@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    No one’s shown any love for my favourite ship design yet, so I’m gonna speak up about my love for the Intrepid class. Voyager just looked so sleek and graceful compared to other ships of the era — the comparatively lumbering Galaxy glass, the oddly square shaped Defiant class, or the cold and sterile Sovereign class.

  • Brett Flippin@vmst.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    @Digital_Cam The II - VI OG movie era. Harder lines but upgraded from the series. There was a harshness and realness to the ships, almost armored looking which fits the more conflict oriented tone of those movies.

  • passinglurker@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    ENT era.

    Externally speaking Starfleet ships march to the beats of NACA/NASA X-planes, Klingon embrace a very soviet yet alien look in contrast, Vulcans look advanced and sleek yet ancient and mythical with the biggest pointiest toys on the block.

    Internally speaking construction is depicted as having limits, tech and interfaces are familiar to real world, cramped ship like rooms are the norm, and there’s no handwaving over how everything might fit inside the ships.

  • NuPNuA@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Dominion War/TNG film era for me, and further stuff that’s extrapolated from that. I prefer ships to be flatter, having a neck just seems to scream “weakpoint”.

    • Basilisk@mtgzone.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s hard to watch The Wrath of Khan where the Reliant fires and hits the Enterprise’s neck and not think “Gee, if Khan had got a bit more of a shot in, that would’ve been the end of the movie right there.” Beyond even followed through on that. I love the Enterprise’s design and love the way that it shows that it’s in space by not being constrained by the rules you need to follow in gravity but it’s definitely not a tactically sound design.

      But then my favourite ship design is the Steamrunner which is equally impractical so sometimes tactics can go out the window for a pretty ship.

  • Betazed@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m going to get crucified for this, but I really dig Discovery’s design language (both the show in general and the ship herself). In particular (I’m ready for those nails), I like their take on the Enterprise in season 2 (and subsequently SNW). In my mind it’s tied with late-TNG era stuff which is what I grew up watching. I have mad respect for the older designs, but I find that modernizing the classics isn’t diminishing my enjoyment even though I’m very acutely aware of the canon issues.

    • lxskllr@mastodon.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      @Betazed @Digital_Cam

      I *really* hate the transparent consoles they use in new Trek. I would be so angry being forced to work on one those ~8 hours per day. How can you see anything with zero contrast and background disruptions?! Like trying to read a web page with a movie going on behind it.

      My computer terminal is at 75% opacity just for the novelty and visuals, but it makes it harder to work with. I wouldn’t have it if I were working in the terminal all day.

    • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      My only problem with Discovery era is that the areas are made to be more spacious than TNG, which was supposed to be cruise ship quality. The design language is modern, but it feels way too spacious.

  • MechKit@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I have seen almost all the Star Trek content, and never developed a love of the ship structure. I like the Defiant because it doesn’t look like it will snap in pieces when it turns a corner. It also proves you don’t need to put the propulsion on sticks.

    • argv_minus_one@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      The manual for a licensed video game I once played claimed that the nacelles are mounted on pylons to separate them from the rest of the ship because they emit hazardous radiation when in use.

      According to Memory Alpha, however, each of the Galaxy class’ unusually large nacelles contains a control room for monitoring the warp drive’s operation up close. This implies that it is safe to be not only near but inside the nacelle while the warp drive is running, which nixes the hazardous radiation theory.

      • Steve Sparrow@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, I think Roddenberry’s initial vision, the nacelles were set apart from the living areas because constant close contact with the source of the warp field was hazardous (and who knows, in time the Alcubierre drive may prove him right).

        I think over time there’s just been this implication that the risk was reduced/eliminated thanks to advances in technology (spurred mostly by the narrative), and they stuck with the look basically out of AestheticTM.

        • VindictiveJudge@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Meanwhile, the Klingons put the nacelle inside their BoP. I guess they just YOLO it.

          Design notes for the shows have said that nacelles usually work best in pairs and with at least 50% line of sight with each other, but they’re not hard requirements. The nacelles in TOS were supposed to be detachable in an emergency but it never happened on the show, similarly to the saucer section.

          I think the explanation for nacelle positioning they ultimately settled on during TNG was something about the shape of the warp bubble, but I’m not sure.

          • Steve Sparrow@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Meanwhile, the Klingons put the nacelle inside their BoP. I guess they just YOLO it.

            Which honestly fits for the Klingons, who probably consider safety as an afterthought.

  • argv_minus_one@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I’m partial to the Galaxy class. It’s big, sleek, and luxurious, which is great for when you need to be diplomatic. “Join the Federation! We have abundant resources and advanced technology, like this cool starship.”

    For when you don’t need to be diplomatic, it’s also got plenty of firepower (enough to melt 20% of an unadapted Borg cube in one phaser blast) and speed (it can soundly outrun a D’deridex).

  • Valen@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    For ST, the Voyager looked good, but I didn’t like the moving nacelles. The updated Enterprise from the first movie was my favorite iteration of the Big-E.

    But, my favorite ship is the Omega class destroyer from Babylon 5. (sue me)

    • CmdrShepard@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      But, my favorite ship is the Omega class destroyer from Babylon 5. (sue me)

      Please forward your address so we know where to send the process servers.