A new report from Americans for Tax Fairness found that America’s richest families accumulated $8.5 trillion in untaxed capital gains in 2022

America’s wealthiest families held an astounding $8.5 trillion in untaxed profits in 2022. According to a report from the nonprofit Americans for Tax Fairness, which analyzed Federal Reserve data, “one in every six dollars (18 percent of the nation’s unrealized gains is held by these roughly 64,000 ultra-wealthy households, who make up less than 0.05 percent of the population.” The report comes as the Supreme Court gears up to decide a case that could preemptively block any efforts to tax the wealth of billionaires.

The data looks at “quiet” income generated by “centi-millionaires,” Americans holding at least $100 million in wealth, and billionaires through unrealized capital gains. Those gains accumulate, untaxed, as assets and investments like stocks, real estate, bonds, and other investments increase in value. If those assets are not sold — or “realized” — they are not taxed, yet America’s wealthiest families can leverage that on-paper value increase to secure favorable loans with low-interest rates in lieu of using taxable income to finance their lifestyle.

“Of the $139 trillion in America’s national wealth, almost three-quarters (73 percent) is held by the richest 10 percent of households, over one-third (35 percent) by the richest 1 percent, and an astounding 11 percent — $15.2 trillion — is held by the handful of fortunate households that make up the billionaire and centi-millionaire class,” the report says. “The wealthiest 1 percent of households hold 44 percent of national unrealized gains ($21.2 trillion), with billionaires and centi-millionaires alone controlling 18 percent ($8.5 trillion).”

  • EatATaco@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    10 months ago

    This has always been the case. 3 co branches of government. The fact that you hadn’t heard it much is probably either a case of you paying more attention, or it getting more attention.

    But yes, republicans have politicized the court, so it’s even more divisive now.

    • Norgur@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      10 months ago

      The feeling I get is more that the famous checks and balances ceased to work and the supreme court is the branch getting the most power from this breakdown.

      • Cornelius_Wangenheim@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        They wouldn’t have so much power if the legislature was functional. The majority of their ruling could be undone by Congress passing a law saying “No, that is not what we meant. Ignore this stupid ruling that willfully misinterpreted our law.”

        Most of our government dysfunction comes back to Republicans refusing to compromise and weaponizing the filibuster to obstruct and prevent Congress from doing anything.

      • EatATaco@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        10 months ago

        Not really because Congress can remove them from office if they get out of line. While I’ve certainly disagreed with many rulings, I can’t find any that I think are really out of line or some gross abuse of power.

        • Brokkr@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          10 months ago

          There are lots of them, especially in the last 10 years. A few more if you include Scalia’s tenure. The most recent of them is the “major question doctrine”. This idea, invented by the current court, allows the court to change any law whenever the court decides that they don’t like the current law and they think it’s important enough. There is no justification in the constitution or in prior case law for such a power to be granted to the court.

              • EatATaco@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                10 months ago

                They didn’t give an actual example, they mentioned a doctrine. Or is it that you don’t know the difference between a case and a doctrine?