This means nothing towards the legality of acquiring things that can no longer be legally purchased. It just means you won’t be downloading a Mario rom from the Library of Congress. … when ever Nintendo even lets their control die anyways. Maybe in the 2200’s…

Yep! Nailed it.

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

No, boycotts are not a corporate death knell. No one is saying that. LITERALLY no one is saying their personal decision or reasoning is the cause of this news.

EVERYONE ks pkinting at shitty things Ubisoft does, says, it caused them to not bjy it and likely is impacting others’ decisions… then you come along going, “NUHUH NUHUH, Ubisoft isn’t losing money because YOU didn’t buy it!”

My dude… we FUCKING KNOW THAT!! We’re saying UBISOFT shot themselves in the foot with shitty behavior. This article is literally about the effects of people not buying en masse, and you’re saying that the NEWS WE ARE READING is not possible…

Just stop. Just stop. Boycotts most often do not work, but THIS IS NOT A BOYCOTT!! This is people explaining why they stopped giving Ubisoft money. Holy fuck, you are good at doubling down on a bad idea.

“lolol see?! They don’t even know! They’re making things up to scare us!”

• actual brainwashed moron

Removed by mod

The irony of you constantly telling people they don’t actually know why they do not pay Ubisoft…

My dude… We’re TELLING YOU why we aren’t buying it. You’re just too dumb and stubborn to accept the truth. Obstinance makes you pathetic, not correct.

Musk shittiness is a high bar.

After you put your pants back on.

Holy projected bottom energy, Batman.

Most people willing to seriously do this are going to be giant assholes, though I know that turns on a lot of bottoms. Stop it. Stop fetishizing people who don’t care about others. Stop. I PROMISE you it’s not as hot as you think it is irl.

People with 6+ figure salaries who think they get to rule the world they’ve done less than nothing to help create.

Google is literally anti-privacy so… “better than google” is … still not necessarily good.

Well if they didn’t even notice an axis on a graph, they might be too stupid for a graph…

My point was only to say that 5% is very mich visible on a 0-100% graph.

Dunno’. I hope so, but Asmond has proven to be a bit … uh… dense. Hopefully he at least learns not to use such negative language when he supposedly doesn’t mean the entire meaning.

People are basically good, but criminally ignorant on average.

Just look at Asmond Gold’s recent ban. I doubt the dude would ever even think about shooting a Palestinian himself, but boy will he happily dehumanize an entire culture as easy as taking a sip of water!

5% is noticeable unless the graph is under 20 pixels tall. Even then, dithering or antialiasing techniques could make it visible.

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Almost like both parties are morally corrupt and owned by external interests…

(note: making a basic observation that is negative of both parties DOES NOT and NEVER means both parties are equally bad)

We’ve got A LOT of cleanup to do, and that’s after we get fascists out of office.