Police boosters insist that police violence and corruption are the result of “a few bad apples.” As the saying goes, “a few bad apples spoil the bushel.” If you think there are just a few bad cops on the force, then you should want to get rid of them before they wreck the whole institution. Bodycams could empirically identify the bad apples, right?
Well, hypothetically. But what if police leadership don’t want to get rid of the bad apples? What if the reason that dashcams, tasers, and pepper spray failed is that police leadership are fine with them? If that were the case, then bodycams would turn into just another expensive prop for an off-Broadway accountability theater.
It wouldn’t be too hard to create a system that records everything the cop does… and transmit it to a storage facility in which that specific cop has no ability to delete would be simple. Incredibly simple.
the idea that a cop gets to choose what the body camera records and that it was a failure of the camera is an intentional narrative to protect bad cops. normal americans live under constant scrutiny (not just by cops, but by everyone.)… they should have more, not less.
Will not be long till we all have cams on us while we work.
most retail already do. and… there’s no need for office types when they can literally see what you’re doing on the screen.
Office buildings, usually have something, too, above the cubicles.
I can see them eventually wanting personal cams with audio. Will happen.
“we shouldn’t let a few good apples exonerate the whole bushel”
Even if they are perfectly fine, we shouldn’t bother trying to sift the corn and peanuts out of the shit.
I said this in a similar thread this morning- body cams don’t matter if the system works always in your favor.
