alt text

wayward vagabond from homestuck: we should improve technology somewhat. well dweller: xkcd 927 “standards”

  • paultimate14@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    1 year ago

    Without knowing the context of what drove OP to make this meme, my guess is they have some high and mighty idea for some sort of standard and someone else pointed out the XKCD comic is the most likely result.

    • Masimatutu@mander.xyzOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Found it on Mastodon, I don’t know if it’s the original source. The XKCD does have a good point, of course. But I mean, if we’d all think like that, no good standards would ever develop, so people shouln’t cite it as a fundamental truth everywhere and avoid all meaningful discussion.

    • 4am@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      “You know what it would be cool if Lemmy could do?”

      Replies: xkcd standards strip, 15 times

  • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 year ago

    I love how both FB messenger and Google talk/chat/whatever were compatible for 3 months, thanks to a fucking standard, before they both “improved somewhat” to be incompatible.

  • Jimmycrackcrack@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 year ago

    I know that XKCD comic in particular but I don’t get what’s going on with the image it’s been superimposed on to or what it has to do with it.

    • csfirecracker@lemmyf.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      1 year ago

      The original image has something along the lines of “I hate this system” and the smug guy in the well is saying “Ah, and yet you participate in said system!” as a gotcha. I think the purpose in this one is just carrying over the smugness with which people post the XKCD when any new possible technological standard is proposed (whether or not it has any merits)

    • neptune@dmv.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s become a meme where a poor soul wants some thing, and the kid pops out of the well with a trite rebuttal.

      In this case, the trite rebuttal is a cartoon about technological standards.

  • kpw@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    How about improving existing standard implementations instead of more fragmentation?

    • Jamie@jamie.moe
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      1 year ago

      Unless the original standard agrees and implements it, then you’ve just created a new standard.

    • orangeboats@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      There are times when the original standard has zero forwards compatibility in it, such that any improvement made to it necessarily creates a new standard.

      And then there’s also times when old greybeards simply disregard the improved standard because they are too used to the classic way.

  • spudwart@spudwart.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 year ago

    A bad standard adds to the pile.

    A good standard crushes the pile.

    Example: Git and Linux.

    Proof: what are the other source management softwares? (Don’t mention Mercurial, that’s cheating).

    Also for Linux, it’s down to the license and history. Linux isn’t a bad investment because all commits directly to the kernel are given freely to all. And it’s not Unix. It doesn’t have the stain of AT&T and their sue happy ways. Also Linux dominates all computer markets except for user desktops. Servers, phones, application specific utilities, etc.

  • dokapuff@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    Why is the alt text calling the peasant “Wayward Vagabond from homestuck?” I mean that’s fucking hilarious but why

  • CoderKat@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    I like the idea of having a regulated, living, backwards compatible standard. Which seems to be what USB-C is now, for phones. The EU has soon to be active regulation that will make it a requirement for many things. Yet, it’s not a single, set in stone standard, but one that’s constantly being expanded (eg, version 3.2 and PD).

    Of course, the regulation has to also be living. Eg, at some point, maybe there’ll be a strong enough reason to allow another standard (by no means do I think USB-C will always make sense). And the regulation has to very carefully choose the standard.

    That way we get the benefits of standardization (from actually everyone using the same format), but we aren’t unreasonably crippling ourselves to do it.

  • Artyom@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    This meme should be the new standard format to resist standard proliferation!