I know you want to avoid all culpability and put it on me
“culpability” seems a lot more important to you than it does to me
and again, let’s presume i’m the worst person in the world and i’m guilty : it doesn’t change anything about what i’ve said
and you know it doesn’t matter if you’re a registered democrat, right? your vote still shows up in the tally just the same
you need to be able to have vacations and save for retirement and do fun things from time to time
ahem actually people only need to exist and survive until they work themselves to death getting tangled in the gears of my spinning jennys
your phone can’t work if your carrier doesn’t know where you are
on top of that, advertisers put bluetooth receivers everywhere, which will log your phone as having been nearby, even if you don’t connect
on top of that, you can do the same bluetooth trick with wifi endpoints
plus your phone has a gps/glonass/whatever receiver in it
probably other reasons too but those are the ones i can think of off the top of my head
yes you can maybe mitigate all of these, but there are probably ones i haven’t thought of that people much smarter than me have, so why take the risk?
Similarly your lack of engaging with the point I keep repeating to you past an unsubstantiated “no” is also an answer.
Yet somehow you bear no responsibility in your criticism.
This is just whataboutism. I could be the guiltiest person on the planet, and that wouldn’t change the fact that electing Biden while he’s failing to stop three (?) genocides is a clear signal to the DNC that the amount of genocide happening on their watch has little to do with their eventual success or failure.
If the democrats win this election while running a candidate that’s twiddling his thumbs over multiple genocides, then the next time they’re presiding over one, they’re going to have solid data that tells them that they don’t have to bother themselves about it because their voter base will elect them anyway.
It’s really that simple.
I know for the sake of pride you aren’t going to openly acknowledge this, given how pointedly you’re refusing to engage with anything I’m saying, but at least admit it to yourself: voting for Biden is sending a signal that the democrats can allow as much genocide as they want so long as they can convince you the other side will be worse.
If you think that’s worth the trade-off, fine, but don’t pretend that that isn’t the trade-off you’re making.
a platformer mixed with stardew valley
You’ve literally asked me once, friend, and I explained why me giving you a name wouldn’t make any sense.
I fully expect that in the hypothetical world where the DNC decides it doesn’t want to lose this election and decides to swap out Biden with somebody else that my gut reaction will be that they’re shit, but that’s because they haven’t done any campaigning yet.
oh no then we’ll have stopped the genocide for NOTHING
biden’s only selling point at the moment is that he isn’t trump, so with 6 months of campaigning and biden’s endorsement you could probably sell any democrat
me giving you a name now is almost entirely pointless given that you’re just going to turn around and say that because they haven’t already done that campaigning you can’t imagine them being popular
Reward? No. I want to stop the one who will make it worse.
do you or do you not acknowledge that by voting biden you’re sending a message to the dnc that their voter base doesn’t care about genocide?
Statistically, your one vote is as meaningful whether you vote for a major party or a third party.
You don’t vote to get your preferred candidate in. You vote to pull the one that might closer to where you want them.
Voting for Biden is voting for a genocide, whether you want it to be or not. Assuming Biden gets in, all you’ve done is tell the DNC that their voter base actually don’t care all that much about genocide.
Does this mean that the victims of the next genocide the democrats preside over can blame you for supporting the last one unconditionally?
so biden is currently presiding over and doing nothing to stop two genocides? and you want to reward that with an unconditional vote of support, so that next time democrats are in office, they’ll know that people don’t care?
just vote for a third party or none of the above
how would your reputation carry over when nobody in the universe knows who you are? it sounds like you’re just inventing a new thing you have to grind
if RPGs have done this plenty of times, then it’s not a new idea, and why are we talking about it in the context of the new ideas starfield had?
people replay games for the gameplay. bethesda wanted a game you could replay for the story, and then have it still work as a story when the player deliberately sequence breaks everything because of their omniscience
I don’t even mean I wouldn’t trust Obsidian. I mean I wouldn’t trust the specific team they had working on New Vegas, which was an absurdly stacked deck that they seemingly haven’t been able to re-create since.
Films you can re-watch twice and have it be just as good the second time are rare. Bethesda wanted a film you could rewatch ten times while simultaneously larping as a cosmic god and trying to break everything you could.
Dark Souls lore seems deeper than it is because it’s less coherently presented than in TES.
A lot of words there to tilt at a strawman.
The inescapable fact is that you’re completely unable to provide any justification as to why re-electing Biden while he’s failing/not bothering to stop a genocide doesn’t signal support from the democratic voter base. (No you don’t have to be a registered democrat to count as “part of their voter base”, and I don’t know why you would think otherwise.)
As I said several comments ago:
Your one response has been to attempt to put some kind of imaginary guilt on my head, which as I’ve repeatedly pointed out, changes absolutely nothing about what I’ve said.
You know full well that at no point have I ever told you you support genocide, but you are inescapably voting in support of it by voting for Biden.