We’re all in on the culture war now

  • diffusive@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    171
    ·
    1 year ago

    Next step: “we are a nation of smokers and millions of us smoke daily. We are making the life of these people easier. Stop to the No Smoking areas. If a pregnant woman is present she can go eff herself. Stop to taxes on tobacco.

  • lennier@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    133
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Luckily, these are just the last desperate acts of an unelected Prime Minister, who only got the job because the last one crashed the economy inside a month (who only got the job because the last one was Boris Johnson). He knows that the party will be condemned to irrelevance next year and is anxious to find anything that could possibly resonate with enough voters

    Ironically Rishi Sunak famously doesn’t really drive, and once had to borrow someone else’s car for a publicity stunt where he inadvertently demonstrated that he doesn’t even know how to fill one up with petrol. Sadly he doesn’t drive because hes a gazillionaire, not because he uses public transport

      • lennier@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Have you seen the polls in the last two years? Or the that a majority of prominent Conservative MPs for the last ten years have already announced they won’t run next year to avoid their own little portillo moments?

        They know they’re done and are holding on for either a miracle or something like this policy change to stick. Which isn’t impossible, but that there’s a good chance of him winning an election is what is wishful thinking. They’re done.

        • ThisLucidLens@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          God I hope so. I really can’t imagine having to put up with another 5 years of this Tory clusterfuck. I genuinely think I would rather move abroad

          • HowManyNimons@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            VOTE EARLY VOTE OFTEN. And make sure your friends vote. Make sure you’ve all got voter ID - don’t get caught out by the Tories’ voter suppression tricks. VOTE VOTE VOTE VOTE VOTE

  • GnuLinuxDude@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    121
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m just taking a moment to remember the massive smear campaign against Corbyn, including the centrists in Labour working to undermine him during their election, and how ultimately it led to this dumbass taking the reins instead.

    • oo1@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Now I’m just waiting 'til starmer does some blairite lowest common denominator research, by reading some red-tops and decides to support this.

      It’ll be like Tony Blair’s housing policies.

  • Lianodel@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    107
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    New national parking platform

    …if that means what I think it means, it’s probably the worst of the lot.

    Take it from an American: mandatory minimum parking will absolutely ruin your towns and cities.

    • FarceOfWill@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      Sorry for downvote, it’s not that at all.

      At the moment each carpark on the UK can use any app it likes on mobile to pay, so you end up with every place having its own. Dozens of apps on phones to pay for parking, having to remember which one is right for the one you’re in today.

      The proposal is to have a single app and have different car parks sign up to it so it’s easier for people to pay.

      I say proposal. It’s not a plan is it. Idea? Dream? Fantasy? I dunno how much they can do before they are forced to call an election and get kicked out.

    • Espi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Just put one big parking lot for every car at the center of the country and then everyone can walk to their destinations! parking solved!

  • NuPNuA@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    102
    ·
    1 year ago

    Letting people travel “how they want” he says while cancelling new train lines for those who wants to use that. The blokes a disengenuious wanker who we can’t be rid of quick enough.

    • rgb3x3@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s straight out of the American conservative talking points book. Somehow, driving has been equated with freedom and not fully embracing driving over all other firms of transportation taking away individual freedom.

      How is it freedom to be forced to own a car, pay for gas and maintenance, and waste your life in car traffic every single day?

      It’s the dumbest talking point.

      • artaxadepressedhorse@lemmyngs.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        46
        ·
        1 year ago

        Typical conservative strategy:

        • Public thing exists
        • Become a lead weight in government so public thing gets underfunded and cannot adapt to market changes.
        • Public thing no longer meets expectations.
        • “See? It should be privatized and you won’t have this issue”
        • Privatize thing. A few people make a crap load of money in the transition. Thing starts out acceptable for the first few years.
        • “Oh no, capitalism uses an infinite growth ponzi model. How do we increase shareholder value this year?”
        • Private thing gets underfunded and consumers get manipulated and abused.

        Are we winning yet?

      • Moyer1666@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        40
        ·
        1 year ago

        Absolutely fucking not. Privatisation is literally the worst thing you could do. Do we really want some random assholes to own something we rely on and try to squeeze it for as much profit as possible? I don’t, fuck capitalism

      • Gabu@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        35
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Privatized public transportation rarely works. At most you’ll find some success stories of companies that partnered with a government to jointly service a transportation line.

        • Aux@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          25
          ·
          1 year ago

          No, it always works. Nationalised transport doesn’t work though.

          • Hadriscus@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            19
            ·
            1 year ago

            Thanks for providing these examples. They completely changed my mind about public transportation privatization

            • Aux@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              13
              ·
              1 year ago

              The example is across the channel - the whole of EU. And Japan as well. One must blind to think that nationalised transport can work.

              • Hadriscus@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                1 year ago

                In France, nationalized transport worked for decades before rail was opened to private compagnies circa 2014 (would have to check exactly). Since then, no one has been able to afford a train ticket. You have no idea what you’re talking about

              • Elivey@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                1 year ago

                Japan literally has privatized roads and it’s kind of a nightmare. You have to pay tolls for nearly all highway transportation because it’s owned by 3 companies.

                Yeah, privatization is great…

      • Hadriscus@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        32
        ·
        1 year ago

        Didn’t England already go through that, and wasn’t it a complete failure ? someone knowledgeable quick please

        • Tristano@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          1 year ago

          Relevant video: https://youtu.be/DlTq8DbRs4k?si=y-muiI81MKk3gin0

          Privatized railways are mostly failures most of the time. Besides Brightline, and I think a bunch of the Japanese railway companies, no nation really has privatized passenger rail. But I think the Japanese system has a weird setup.

          Actually, I think Italy and Germany have started allowing private companies to operate on their railways, but I think they need to fit it between the nationalized services. I could be wrong about that tho.

      • 𝒍𝒆𝒎𝒂𝒏𝒏@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        1 year ago

        I disagree. Aside from privately owned Brightline who already owns the land around their stations, owns their tracks, and has a lot of incentive to expand their coverage, I have not heard of a single other piece of privatized infrastructure that actually benefits the users or actively engages in expansion

  • Sean@liberal.city
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    89
    ·
    1 year ago

    @mondoman712
    Best driving experience in the world? The Netherlands, because when you shift a significant number of people off the roads into alternative transport the remaining drivers have less traffic and higher average speeds than an over-reliance on cars.

    Risak is just committing the same mistake Robert Moses made 80 - 50 years ago, building more roads to “solve” traffic but it just induced more car traffic - - and then repeat again and again.

    • Flag@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Do you have a good source? Not denying, just on the lockout for stuff to shove in diehard motorists’ faces that they will struggle to deny with anything coming anywhere close to resembling facts

      • SatanicNotMessianic@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        1 year ago

        https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Braess's_paradox

        Adding extra capacity to a network when the moving entities selfishly choose their route can in some cases reduce overall performance. That is because the Nash equilibrium of such a system is not necessarily optimal. The network change induces a new game structure which leads to a (multiplayer) prisoner’s dilemma. In a Nash equilibrium, drivers have no incentive to change their routes. While the system is not in a Nash equilibrium, individual drivers are able to improve their respective travel times by changing the routes they take. In the case of Braess’s paradox, drivers will continue to switch until they reach Nash equilibrium despite the reduction in overall performance.

  • ChewyAC@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    81
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Freedom to travel except if you’re taking the train, then you can get fucked with delays, overcrowded trains and expensive fairs. Glad to be living on this hell rock

    • jonne@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      42
      ·
      1 year ago

      Forcing everyone to own a car due to lack of public transport/safe cycling infrastructure fucks over motorists as well. Imagine the traffic in London if suddenly everyone that commutes by train was forced to drive in.

  • prtm@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    77
    ·
    1 year ago

    What a fucking idiot. Has he been living under a rock? He’s going out of his way to remake all of America’s mistakes. Absolute buffoon.

    • Ulijin@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      1 year ago

      What mistakes? The ultra rich have a great life in the US. He’s just serving his own interests. But remember you’re poor because of immigrants! /s

    • Gabu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s what brexit means - fuck 99% of the population so the 1% gets to enjoy the same inequality as in 'murica.

      • Frogmanfromlake [none/use name]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s alway funny when a Brit gets really mad at any non-Brit discussing politics and says, “it’s not like the US!” Idk their politicians seem to be trying pretty damn hard to ape whatever the Dems and Republicans are doing.

        • Blue and Orange@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          The Tories here in the UK are trying to emulate the GOP, of that there is no doubt. They’d also force us poors back into victorian era workhouses given the chance.

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    74
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Poor motorists having only like 99% of infrastructure reserved for them.

    So victimised right now.

    Let’s take away railway sleepers so they can drive on the tracks.

  • Vlhacs@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    More freedom for people that can afford to buy a car and live in an area with ample parking. But no freedom for everyone else amirite

    • mondoman712@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      1 year ago

      You’re free to travel how you like as long as you keep the fuck out of my way and breathe in my car farts

    • HowManyNimons@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I can afford a car. There’s plenty of parking where I live. But I’d much rather use my transport as an opportunity to use my bike, raise my fitness, and reduce my contribution to climate change, thanks. All of Sunak’s ideas here are bad news.

  • GarfieldYaoi [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    1 year ago

    “I love cars. Therefore we should mandate that EVERYONE drives!”

    As someone who is forced to drive because I was unlucky enough to be born in bumfuck nowhere: fuck you. I hate always-busy traffic. If waiting in line is your idea of fun, go watch paint dry or something. I’m too busy to lengthen my commute.

    • Hadriscus@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      Have you seen the latest from Macron ? he said exactly that a few days ago. You can make out the car & oil lobby through his words https://youtu.be/Tpbci1kOMEM

      Rough transcript :

      We (the french) care about our cars. Me ? I dig/love it.

  • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    LTN is low traffic neighborhood.

    Anyone else notice the pluses don’t actually do anything?

    Use bus lane when it’s not rush hour? So it does nothing.

    Parking? Doesn’t solve traffic.

    • DJDarren@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      1 year ago

      The beauty of all of this to the Tories is that it gives them something to crow about, without actually having to do any work.

    • desconectado@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Hey you can now use the bus lanes at midnight pm on a Sunday, and have extra parking spots in Peckham. It benefits everyone!