Can we stop repeating clickbait titles from cancer tech magazines? If you post, then why not just give us the gist of the article? For instance here: what’s the feature, and why is it a concern that one might „fall in love“ with it?
Can we stop repeating clickbait titles from cancer tech magazines? If you post, then why not just give us the gist of the article? For instance here: what’s the feature, and why is it a concern that one might „fall in love“ with it?
It’s called sponsorblock, and there is no machine learning involved whatsoever. The data is crowdsourced.
Anyone else read that as „morphine spray-on gel…“?
Archive link against the pay/subscription wall
They have an iPhone, so they are going to be fine.
Of course they are cheaper, thats why they put them everywhere instead of regular buttons.
Have you tried zotero? Might be the solution to a problem you didn’t even knew you had.
Yes it is. But your comment still doesn’t make sense until you add “per year”.
WattHours is a unit of work. If you say that bitcoin uses x amount of Wh it doesn’t say shit about how much it actually consumes. Because you don’t say in what amount of time Bitcoin uses said amount of work, you cannot compare it. I could state, that Bitcoin uses 5 Wh. Which would also be correct.
Its the same as saying, Bob eats 5 apples. Alice eats 2000 apples. Can you compare the two? No, because what I forgot to mention is, that Bon eats 5 apples a week and Alice eats 2000 apples in 3 years. Now i can compare the two.
Do you get my point?
172 TWh per year
Your statement was as useful as the following: A VW Polo car costumes 3000 liters of fuel.
*Edit: Downvote me all you want 😂 if I am right I am right.
I think with Edge you get punched, robbed and then raped for good measure.
Do you think there are no assholes working for google or mozilla? Assholes are everywhere. And fuck cancel culture.
Edit: I stand by what I said, you can downvote me all you want. It doesn’t matter to me one bit.
That’s partly because the pot itself heats up. With conventional stoves you have to heat the pot first, which takes a lot of time.
That’s nice, but this project seems very dead, or am I missing something?
I don’t think brains are capable of thinking something about something. Brains are used to think something about something. I don’t know, sounds stupid to me too. I think of it like a plane. There’s a computer or a person flying the plane, the plane doesn’t fly itself. Probably would have sounded less stupid, if it said something like „What happens really in our brains, if we think about/hear these mimicry attempts?“
Oh nice, and Apple made that native with iOS18?
WTH are „trail apps“?
Oh wow I didn’t know. Fuck Ashton Kutcher!
I don’t see what was wrong with the comment of /u/voyajer. Can you elaborate?
This seems like something you don’t want to use on a road with cars. Otherwise it looks neat!