• urinebubbles@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 minutes ago

    Throughout the day, I will picture haley stevens saying ‘israel comes to me in my dreams’ and i chuckle to myself. Who wouldve thought that supporting a genocidal state with more orphan and amputated children in modern history would be a losing card?

  • LEM 1689@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Its my party and I’ll hide if I want to
    Hide if I want to
    Hide if I want to
    You would hide to if it happened to you

      • TaeKwonDoh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Former Michigan governor Blanchard did say that “something snapped”, so maybe there’s something to that observation after all.

        • a_non_monotonic_function@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          24 minutes ago

          Sort of, but I remember hearing a lot of specific from one about how she might go manic in the middle of the night and start calling people and being a bit nuts and then by the morning pretending nothing happened.

  • Godric@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    17 hours ago

    If she was bought, or disagreed with Abdul el-Sayed on policy, she would have endorsed a month before the election. She had a personal falling out that led to a career-ending crashout, which is even funnier.

    Goodbye, ineffective Judas, you and your fake-ass accent won’t be missed!

    • Etterra@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      She could have been bought last minute, but more likely she was already bought and, seeing that she was gonna lose, they yanked that string hard enough to get her to burn her while career rather than risk exposure and a potential felony charge.

      • Godric@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        44 minutes ago

        ??? She already lost the primary several months ago.

        I think if there was a yankable string, it would have been yanked a month before the election, giving her time to campaign with $5 Rogers and maybe sway people, instead of looking like an obviously desperate rat jumping on a sinking ship.

      • dou9m@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        20 hours ago

        LOL. No.

        Schumer and Jeffries are still the leaders, with Jeffries aiming for SOTH.

        • CaliforniaSober@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          15 hours ago

          That’s not the same and they are being challenged. No reason to talk doom and gloom less than a week from the election being called, with no real evidence of problems, months before anyone is sworn in.

          The level of assuredness is lame and obviously worthless.

          • dou9m@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 hours ago

            To be unfettered would require no Hakeem or Schumer. They understand nothing about the American people and deserve to be in prison for their contributions to genocide along with half of these other fuckers who run the world’s leader in modern day slavery by an immense margin.

  • slickgoat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Incredible self own. The Dems were always going to win. What was her game plan for the day after the election?

          • fonix232@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            20 hours ago

            What’s up with fascists taking up all the good names and symbols?

            (rhetorical question, I know the answer very well)

            • 🇨🇦GreenBeard🇨🇦@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              14
              ·
              19 hours ago

              Don’t you see that the whole aim of Newspeak is to narrow the range of thought? In the end we shall make [thought crime] literally impossible, because there will be no words in which to express it. Every concept that can ever be needed, will be expressed by exactly one word, with its meaning rigidly defined and all its subsidiary meanings rubbed out and forgotten…

              George Orwell, “1984” Part 1 Chapter 5

              For those that don’t know what the answer is.

        • jaybone@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          20 hours ago

          Is the idea they had been paying her all along? Or they just paid her to make this flip? Because if it’s the latter, I don’t see how they benefit from that. Which makes me think she really just did it out of spite.

          • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            9 hours ago

            AIPAC apparently spent 9 million on campaign ads for her to avoid getting a Muslim in her seat. No idea if they’ve been “paying her” directly in any way.

      • slickgoat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        18 hours ago

        What are you arguing? That the Dems didn’t have the biggest win in the last 50 years and all the polls (even Fox) correctly predicted it?

        The only thing beyond accurate prediction was the senate, which was within the margin of error. But the house was gone months ago.

    • dou9m@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      20 hours ago

      They weren’t going to win under her… which was the point and why she endorsed Mike.

        • dou9m@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          20 hours ago

          All I know is that it’s gotta be more preferable in her mind to sit in a toilet stall than to let everyone know she either got bribed, blackmailed, and/or some other mix of extreme corruption that we’re not aware of yet as a general populace.

          I’d do the same thing but I’m also smart enough to know how to be an insider threat so I would effectively just be robbing a bunch of Russians and Israelis to give their money back to charities, instead of committing treason like this disgusting looking whore.

          • slickgoat@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            20 hours ago

            That’s my point. If money was the motivation, then take the money and own what comes next. It’s the utter shame that’s puzzling. Take Mitch McConnell. His motivation is power and money. He did disgustingly unfair things in Congress every single working day. After which he went home and slept like a baby. No shame there.

            But this woman, like McConnell, did something nasty, possibly for money, possibly for revenge for losing, and has a sense of shame about it. Hence the hiding. What’s the point? The day after was always going to land. Own your nasty mess or don’t engage in it.

            • dou9m@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              19 hours ago

              I mean I highly doubt it’s just money at this point, it’s much more likely to be a combination of things.

              I fully expect her sob story to eventually be that she didn’t want to do any of this… which makes sense, because the deserved punishment is literally execution.