• KeenFlame@feddit.nu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    It was always possible. It was always the billionaires needing more money more than they needed their slave studios to make good entertainment

    • MouldyCat@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      3 days ago

      It works really well on mobile! Very smooth and playable. You have to use Chrome for WebGPU support sadly.

      • Hond@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        IDK on Android. But on PC i just had to activate WebGPU in the about:config in Firefox to make it work.

        edit: Yeah and it works really well for what it is. Seeing thousands of other cars on your map is really fun. I highly recommend to deactivate collisions though. Otherwise its constant carnage. The netcode for this slopped together port of a 20 years old game is obviously pretty poor. Especially because there isnt regional instancing. But there is fun to be had with a few online races. I played through UG2 probably four to five times through the years but never had the chance to play the multiplayer. So i’m pretty happy to have had the chance to experience that for once.

  • one_old_coder@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 days ago
    1. Slop
    2. No link to the web site

    Why do “news” sites always forget to put links to external resources?

    • deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      42
      ·
      3 days ago

      Because you might click the link and leave the news site.

      Source: worked in the industry, literally told this.

      • DdCno1@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Publisher relations is another reason. I don’t think EA appreciates this.

        • deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          Been there too. I think it was Warner Brothers (at the time) that had a hissy fit about a review of a game. They didn’t like the review: they wanted advertising rather than editorial. We told them to talk to the sales department.

              • DdCno1@beehaw.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 day ago

                Interesting. I actually remember this game very fondly. It’s a well made mid-budget game for kids, in my opinion. Nothing groundbreaking, but charming, atmospheric and with fun gameplay. I was young when it came out, definitely part of the target audience (despite not caring about Harry Potter), but even revisiting it as an adult, I still found it to be enjoyable. Reading the Wikipedia article, I’m actually surprised by how low its review scores are.

                How did your magazine cover it?

                • deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  21 hours ago

                  Pretty much what you said, but that’s from memory. The site and the review is long gone now.

    • supersquirrel@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Yeah whenever I link to a science article I always include a link to the paper that it is written about if it is open access in my lemmy posts and yet in the damn popscience articles I am linking to from reputable websites they hide the links to the actual research as if to condescend you or send the message it isn’t for you… even when the research is OPEN ACCESS.

      Why is it hidden in a blue link in the body of the article amid 40 other tangentially relevant blue links? …or why is the link put as a fineprint at the bottom of the article rather than being emphasized as the thing the article is talking about???

      It is pathetic and it pisses me off. It is one of the reasons I am so motivated to link directly to open access research when covering it in a general news context.

      longer bit on my perspective about public science advocacy

      I don’t know who someone reading my post is, they could be a dog, a PHD, a bot, a farmer… who knows why should I assume they wouldn’t be interested in taking a glance at the actual paper? Do you even know yourself well enough to know you aren’t the kind of person that might be interested in the actual science until we design media so that the link to papers is displayed clearly and naturally, not to pressure anyone into it but rather as a trap to lure in and grab onto curious minds and send them on a journey?!

      I genuinely think this changes how people perceive science in general when they can peak in, flip through a couple of current scientific papers, ask a couple of questions and be like “cool, I never thought about that!” and then move on. The status quo of Elsevier slapping you with a $45 price tag to read an article you might find useless or indecipherable is just insulting and in my opinion pushes the general public towards feeling fundamentally seperated from science. I also find it insufferable when scientists and writers claim the average person isn’t going to read a complex scientific paper to which again I reiterate I don’t like to assume I know who the people will be that read my posts/links, I have no idea! Maybe they don’t know either, so why not? Don’t we all win just a tiny bit if someone checks out a scientific paper just briefly out of mild curiousity? I think we do…

    • darcmage@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Agreed on the slop part. There’s a Twitter post embedded with a link to the site in the article.

    • GrindingGears@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      No way. No shade to Hot Pursuit (also a banger), but this game was right place, right time. Probably the best timed game in history. NFSU1 has a special place in my heart too, but this one was next level.

  • xan1242@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’ve been a part of the modding scene for these games for about a decade now.

    As easy as this is to get running, which is a great thing, I feel the effort to make this has been misplaced and that this is a fad which will die off in a month’s time.

    There are many better ways to go about this and, more importantly, there are much bigger issues to solve (such as lack of any meaningful new content for these games). It’s historically always been limited due to the lack of tooling that is functional and user-friendly enough to craft mods for this game.

    And that is changing for the better, for sure. But all of these slopped up mods and ports are just made for clout to ask for donos. It doesn’t feel right because there’s almost always no passion (or even any effort) put into this.

  • Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    2 days ago

    This is SOOOO SICK. I’ve never played any NFS games, and this is a blast so far. Thank you for this!

    • mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      I grew up on NFS:U2

      it’s a great game. speed done right, car controls done right. atmosphere done right. progression done well.

      it’s a good game.

  • Stalinwolf@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    3 days ago

    I played through this entire game several times using an SNES controller that my brother rigged up to an old printer cable. It worked perfectly.

  • Loren@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    Can this slop garbage stop getting headlines? Fucking Christ.