Campaigners have welcomed the move to outlaw the breed they argue is "a clear and present threat to public health", but concerns have been raised it may not be practical and lead to other kinds of dogs being prohibited.
  • qdJzXuisAndVQb2@lemm.eeEnglish
    2515·
    1 year ago

    Bullshit. You think shitbulls got their reputation from thin air? Shit dogs for shit owners.

    • vivadanang@lemm.eeEnglish
      24·
      1 year ago

      well with that airtight argument you’ll go far! you should work for the GOP with these kind of ideas, they’ll fit right into that shit show

      • qdJzXuisAndVQb2@lemm.eeEnglish
        146·
        1 year ago

        Not at all a troll username - it is a new account, but I don’t like making up usernames so I just keyboard mash. I stand by everything I say though.

        Edit. I looked through your comment history. Bit hypocritical to accuse others of trolling with comments like that.

        Copy pasted comments that are totally in good faith:

        If only we could use statistics to cull people, too.

        I think we should genocide every dog because any dog is more dangerous than no dogs.

        • kmkz_ninja@lemmy.worldEnglish
          315·
          1 year ago

          I just think we should be consistant. If we’re using statistics to cull creatures, racists are going to have a field day.

          • themajesticdodo@lemmy.worldEnglish
            31·
            1 year ago

            If we’re using statistics to cull creatures, racists are going to have a field day.

            Did you just insinuate black people commit more crime?

            Comparing other races to dogs is pretty fucked up to start with.

      • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.worldEnglish
        65·
        1 year ago

        Why not defend your argument instead of attacking another person? It might be more effective and useful, you know unlike your vicious pitbull