• hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    22 hours ago

    You can also be left and be right, and dumb and wise, and black and white, all simultaneously! Up is down, back is forwards, authoritarian is left!

    No, left is against hierarchy

    • Cosmoscos ☭@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      anarchism isnt the only branch of left, similarly how libertarianism isnt the only branch of right. You guys are too confident for associating yourself with a vastly non existent ideology

    • Soggy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      14 hours ago

      It’s not a binary. I’m against hierarchal class structures but I still think we need specialists making rules about shit like environmental protection.

          • Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            15 hours ago

            Yes, I agree, which would disagree with the other comment’s point that socialism inherently opposes individualism.

            • naught101@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              12 hours ago

              Interesting. Where/when are they not opposed?

              Edit: Noting that I didn’t mean that they are mutually exclusive outside of social structure… You can take individual actions in a socialist society. The question is just around which is the core principle of the organisation of society.

              Edit 2: to me anarchy isn’t inherently individualistic, it is just opposed to power-over social structures. You can have a voluntary socialism. Look at Chiapas, for instance.