Despite the manufactured controversy, the 12-metre exhibit is the first time the story of Palestinian dispossession is being told in a national institution
Despite the manufactured controversy, the 12-metre exhibit is the first time the story of Palestinian dispossession is being told in a national institution
I wouldn’t make a nazi comparison because they were refugees. Still, refugees or not, it was an invasion on foreign soil and the Palestinians treated them as invaders.
I’d liken it more to settlers complaining tales about the trail of tears don’t represent their side of the story.
Worth knowing that most of the immigration preceded the Holocaust, and Palestinians treated them as illegal immigrants (which they were), not as invaders.
Look, that same refugee trope founding myth is what north America used with the pilgrims, so it’s beneficial to deconstruct that. Because it is the same founding myth of Israel.
It’s also worth reading early writings from Zionists about the “type” of Jewish people the Zionists wanted for the new state. They basically believed that the refugees were too poor and of the wrong mentality - essentially tainting what they were trying to build. Literally a screening office was setup to allow or disallow certain types of Jews. Zionists only acquiesced because they needed more people to bolster their numbers and reasons for expansion
https://palestinenexus.com/articles/eugenicism
You’re right, my history around that time is piecemeal. Thanks for the extra context and information.