• Onno (VK6FLAB)@lemmy.radio
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    186
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 days ago

    Here’s the thing … as crazy as a notebook with passwords sounds, it’s not accessible to someone across the internet.

    • 6nk06@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      74
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      13 days ago

      Password managers check the URL before giving its data. A human being can be fooled into giving it to a fake web site.

      • MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        43
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        13 days ago

        TBF, they can be fooled too.

        Bitwarden warns against using autofill on load for that very reason, as then simply loading a malicious page might cause it to provide passwords to such a site.

        And then, a human when a site doesn’t autofill, is more likely to just go “huh, weird” and do it manually.

        • Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          edit-2
          13 days ago

          You’ve always got the human element, bypassing security features; but extra little hurdles like a password manager refusing to autofill an unknown url is at least one more opportunity for the user to recognize that something’s wrong and back away.

          If you’re already used to manually typing in the auth details, you may not even notice you’re not on the site you were expecting.

          • gaylord_fartmaster@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            13 days ago

            Someone manages to maliciously sneak username and password fields onto a site that store what is entered as soon as it’s typed. They don’t even have to be visible to the user and bitwarden will fill them in as soon as the page loads.

              • gaylord_fartmaster@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                13 days ago

                Right, “maliciously sneak”, as in they’ve either gained access to make changes to the site ditectly, or they’ve found a way to inject their scripts to steal creds.

                • Serinus@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  13 days ago

                  And how is that any different from not having a password manager?

                  Yes, if someone hijacks a domain they can get credentials intended for that domain. A password manager doesn’t make a huge difference here, because why would they make the site look any different than normal?

        • lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          13 days ago

          they can be fooled too.

          Makes it harder: when I go to the wrong website, the manager simply doesn’t suggest credentials (it does not have) for it. That causes me to wonder why.

          Without a password manager, a user is never prompted to wonder. They’d simply not notice.

    • vext01@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      13 days ago

      Yeah, It’s actually quite a secure way to store passwords, since it requires physical access.

      I knew a guy who had a drawer full of slips of paper with passwords written on. He called it the “security drawer”. Made me smile, but probably shouldn’t have been advertising it.

      • lars@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        12 days ago

        Oh I know him. What a weirdo. Fun guy tho. Did he move what’s his new address anyway?

      • GraniteM@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        13 days ago

        INTERNET PASSWORD LOGBOOK is probably a paper slip that you can remove, and then it’ll just be a blank leather journal.

        Now a REALLY secure physical logbook would just have the cover of a boring, unremarkable-looking book on the outside.

      • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        12 days ago

        My mom had a nice little notebook for passwords. But when she passed, we couldn’t find it anywhere… We went through the whole apartment, everything.

        Not having her passwords made a lot of things harder, closing her accounts, accessing her laptop, phone, etc. So while you shouldn’t advertise it, do tell a few people where to find it if they need to.

    • A_norny_mousse@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 days ago

      It depends on what the user fills it with.

      Even the objectively safest solutions will be much shorter, and have less entropy, than what a pw-manager can deal with.

    • acosmichippo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      13 days ago

      but:

      1. way less convenient to generate dozens and dozens of unique, complex passwords. which means it’s less likely to be used/updated as much as it should be.

      2. not tied into MFA which is an additional layer of security and convenience

    • Midnight Wolf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 days ago

      Their Ring camera that points directly at the desk they keep this notebook on: “it’s showtime”

  • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 days ago

    Honestly, a physical password book isn’t a bad idea.

    Not accessible via the internet, and in most cases if someone has physical access to your system you’re done for anyway.

    The main weakness it has is from a nosey flatmate, spouse, or child in the house.

    • tiramichu@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 days ago

      Yep. My Dad in his late 70s uses this system and it works great for him.

      People make fun of it, but for people with low tech literacy this is actually far better than having a mish-mash of solutions where some their logins end up automatically saved in iOS on their phone, some are saved in Chrome on the desktop, some are just in their head, they don’t know where anything is, and are constantly losing access and resetting credentials all the time.

      And it definitely reduces the burden on me of parental tech support, when its all in the book.

    • Darren@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      13 days ago

      My Mum died recently and my step dad is shit with tech, so their password book was invaluable in helping us gain access to her Apple account and her phone. It meant we were able to get to her iCloud passwords, so now we have access to everything.

      So yeah, password books are actually pretty handy.

    • brot@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      13 days ago

      Yeah, my in-laws have such a book and it honestly is great. They live in their own flat where nobody can access the book without breaking in. They do not save their passwords in their browser, so anyone hacking into their PC can’t grab them. If they want to login into an account, they take out their book, put in the user name and unique password and that’s it. Quite the good method and I really do not see many problems there.

    • tarknassus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 days ago

      “People can no longer remember passwords good enough to reliably defend against dictionary attacks, and are much more secure if they choose a password too complicated to remember and then write it down.

      We’re all good at securing small pieces of paper. I recommend that people write their valuable passwords down on a small piece of paper, and keep it with their other valuable small pieces of paper: in their wallet.

      Obscure it somehow if you want added security: write “bank” instead of the URL of your bank, transpose some of the characters, leave off your userid. This will give you a little bit of time if you lose your wallet and have to change your passwords. But even if you don’t do any of this, writing down your impossible-to-memorize password is more secure than making your password easy to memorize.”

      Bruce Schneier - 2005.

    • Romkslrqusz@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      13 days ago

      For the majority of my clients who use this kind of system, it is totally dysfunctional.

      Most of the records are incorrect, my guess is that they occasionally reset the password on mobile while the book is inaccessible and then don’t remember to update it in the book later.

      Effective use relies on the user’s understanding of umbrella accounts. I’ve had users have separate written entries for “Office”, “Skype”, “Hotmail”, and “Windows” because they don’t understand those things are all one Microsoft Account.

      As passwords get updated, it can become a mess of crossed out records with new ones squished into the margins. When a someone dies, anything written illegibly can be difficult for surviving family to discern. As the book gets filled out, it can get tricky to keep things alphabetized unless the user provisioned additional empty space between records.

      This system can work great for someone who is meticulous, neat, and organized.

      For your average person, I’ve had better luck solving the problem with a password manager synced to an online account that is protected by MFA and has recovery options that are also protected by MFA.

      • pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        13 days ago

        I’ve had users have separate written entries for “Office”, “Skype”, “Hotmail”, and “Windows” because they don’t understand those things are all one Microsoft Account.

        In fairness to them, I get a new email every month or two from Microsoft letting me know that they merged another account that I didn’t ever ask them to.

    • lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 days ago

      The main weakness

      is it’s a pain in the ass.

      • Won’t generate strong passwords.
      • Won’t fill out login forms for me.
      • Manual, slower search and copying (worse for dyslexia).
      • Increases risk of submitting credentials to wrong site/app (especially malicious ones).
      • Increases error of mistyping credentials.
      • More effort to back up & retrieve.
    • Eezyville@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 days ago

      The main weakness it has is from a nosey flatmate, spouse, or child in the house.

      Watch out for that home grown script kiddie

    • hansolo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      13 days ago

      What this book likely doesn’t suggest, is to just code the username.

      I have 2FA backup codes in my go bag and nowhere do I write the usernames or even the service if it’s important.

      You know your email address. If you lose this in an airport, writing “main email” makes it useless to anyone else.

    • A_norny_mousse@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      13 days ago

      The main weakness it has is from a nosey flatmate, spouse, or child in the house.

      I disagree. Using this book will always lead to shorter passwords that are easier to type. That’s the main weakness imo.

      Or in other words: it really depends what the user fills it with. It should be accompanied by a little machine that spits out random passwords, I’m thinking a rubics-cube-shaped bling pendant at the end of the bookmark band.

      • Telodzrum@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        13 days ago

        Not at all. It will lead to easier to type passwords, likely. But that doesn’t mean shorter. This could easily be filled with passwords that are four words long with special characters interspersed.

        • A_norny_mousse@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          12 days ago

          Which you then have to type out every time. Laziness wins: they will be shorter.

          The assumption is that the product is for non-savvy users. They might not even understand what you wrote up there.

          Autocorrect can help here, but dictionary words are easily brute-forced guessed. And - more importantly - that hypothetical user would have to come up with that idea in the first place. But people who come up with such ideas usually already use password managers anyhow.

      • Coffeephilic@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        12 days ago

        a rubics-cube-shaped bling pendant

        I’m imagining a different character on each face of each cubelet, which you would throughly scramble each time for a one-in-whatever-gagillion string? Am I getting that right?

  • StrawberryPigtails@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    13 days ago

    So… It’s a password book? Like, pen and paper?Not the best choice for storing passwords, but I’d be more willing to do that than trusting Amazon not to hold my passwords hostage with a digital service by them.

  • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    13 days ago

    I see no issue with this, especially for an elderly person, for example, to keep at home. The only way this will get “breached”, is if someone breaks into her home. At that point, the password book is the least of her concerns anyway. In fact, from a cyber security point of view, this is brilliant if kept in a safe place, such as a locked safety box. You can’t really remotely hack a physical book.

  • skisnow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 days ago

    So far the combined might of the Russian, Chinese, American and North Korean hacking teams have been unable to crack the post-it note on my desk.

  • dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    13 days ago

    PSA: Home use? That’s probably okay. Work use? If you’re in-office, this is a ticking time-bomb that can get you fired, one way or another. Use the company 1password or whatever you have access to, please. Thank you.

    • Chaotic Entropy@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      12 days ago

      InfoSec likes nothing more than for you to tell them not to worry because you write all your passwords down and only read emails after you’ve printed them. 100% secure.

    • Frostbeard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 days ago

      In my office I have a list that says passwords all nonsens and just as a decoy. I have a system that I use for rotation woth a visual reminder (by association, not directly) somwhere in my office

    • tabular@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      13 days ago

      I’ve not found anything better. Storing on my computer, or worse someone else’s computer, doesn’t seem safe.

      • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        13 days ago

        It’s pretty safe. Competent password managers will be heavily encrypted. Having your passwords hacked is essentially unheard of. You don’t have to worry about it being on someone else’s computer as without your master password the password file is useless.

        I think the biggest case was LastPass, and they did it by getting a keylogger onto a developers PC to get at their password, but afaik customer passwords were safe unless your master password was weak or reused from a breached one.

        But, a notebook isn’t hackable at all. But then the people around you could potentially get into it, which is a far more likely threat for a ton of people.

        Either way use 2FA at every site that will allow it.

        • tabular@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          13 days ago

          One master password to rule them all, One server to find them, One password to bring them all, and in the darkness bind them.

          Yeah I use 2FA with the master notebook.

        • greybeard@feddit.online
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          13 days ago

          LastPass’s biggest problem was that they were almost the first in the game, and mistakes/choices they made 20 years ago bit them hard when they got hacked.

          There were two major issues with LastPass’s security model:

          1. Non-Password data wasn’t encrypted. So usernames and urls were visible by the people who stole the vaults.
          2. Passwords were encrypted with a number of iterations based on when the account was created, so older accounts were only run through a single iteration. The iteration process makes it much harder to guess the master password(by making it take a longer time). So single iteration makes it pretty quick to guess the password.

          So with flaw 1 you could see what vaults might have valuable passwords like banks and crypto wallets. And with flaw 2 you could reasonably quickly break into the vaults of long time users.

          So aside from their lax security allowing the compromise to happen in the first place (Nothing is fool proof), they weren’t providing the level of protection most people assumed.

          More modern password managers like BitWarden fixed those problem a long time ago.

      • Bone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        13 days ago

        The trick is to use code language, and don’t forget the code. Then you can use digital sources more freely, I feel.

    • Shifty Eyes@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      13 days ago

      My ex kept her’s in an unprotected excel file. I never peeked, I was just surprised when I saw her accessing it on her laptop.

    • A_norny_mousse@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 days ago

      It really depends what the user fills it with. “Clever” solutions like using your daughter’s birthday, or other hard-to-remember-but-easy-to-deduce strings.

      It should be accompanied by a little machine that spits out random passwords, I’m thinking a rubics-cube-shaped bling pendant at the end of the bookmark band.

    • hansolo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      13 days ago

      Can confirm. I had to do a double take that I didn’t write this comment and just forget.

    • TwoBeeSan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      13 days ago

      Of the 200 elderly I see maybe 75% still use the book or a variation of it.

      The best is when they use iPad notes or even their fucking contacts to save info lol

      • pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        13 days ago

        The best is when they use iPad notes or even their fucking contacts to save info lol

        That’s awesome, worrying, adorable, and still more secure than using the same password everywhere.

  • appropriateghost@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    13 days ago

    we might laugh at this but I think this is useful. Even though I wouldn’t use something like this and I’d just use a regular dedicated blank notebook and my password manager, it can be useful to people who have problems with computers and can’t handle a password manager, yet may give pages with good templates to show how to record sensitive information.

    • techdaddyproxy@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      13 days ago

      Or for folks that would be otherwise leaving logins and passwords in a clear text file on their desktop (glares at coworker). It’s still clear text, but at least it’s air gapped. It’s not for me, but it’s certainly for someone.

    • win95@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      12 days ago

      Exactly this is the reason why I gifted it to someone. I’m already glad they don’t use 1 password for every website.

  • oppy1984@lemdro.id
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    13 days ago

    I should get this for my dad, he recently got a new computer at best buy and the geek squad told him his files were all in the cloud and sent him home. Guess who got a call the next day because “all my passwords are in a word document in some fucking cloud”. Yeah that was a fun day spent setting up his computer while listening to his rant about the geek squad and “the fucking cloud”… thanks geek squad…

    • HoopyFrood@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      12 days ago

      As a software engineer who values humanity has done a good bit of work with “the cloud”, i think your dad has the right set of feelings towards the cloud. That fucking cloud can go get bent

      • oppy1984@lemdro.id
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        12 days ago

        Oh I agree but it would be nice if he’d have listened to me years ago and started using a password manager at least. I know he’ll never go full self hosting, but come on at least use Bitwarden!

    • Romkslrqusz@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      13 days ago

      * for the tech inclined

      Managing sync between mobile and desktop is a bit more complicated than average consumers have the patience for (it’s really not very complicated, average consumers are just impatient)

    • zyberteq @lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      12 days ago

      For a lot of people at 60+, writing things down is easier and safer. It will also help anyone that would need to troubleshoot or in the event of death in a very simple way.

  • logicbomb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    13 days ago

    This isn’t even weird.

    I think most security experts would recommend that you have your most important passwords written down somewhere, and then hopefully locked up in some safe or deposit box somewhere. You don’t need to buy an entire book for it, but some people like to spend money.

    If this is for your less important passwords, then for the most part, writing them down is actually better. You won’t be as tempted to reuse your banking password for your social media. And some people like writing things down. A password manager is a better solution, but lots of people aren’t as good with technology and if they even let the browser remember it, they won’t know how to retrieve it later if they want to use a different computer, for example.

    • GreenKnight23@lemmy.worldBanned from community
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 days ago

      I have a letter in my safe in the event of my death that contains all my passwords and accounts. I have also slipped in a dead man switch that she’s unaware of that will wipe out my “collection of science”.

    • MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      13 days ago

      My password-manager is a script that gpg-decrypts to XDG_RUNTIME_DIR and then opens it in editor, encrypts back on changes. Is that bad?

        • MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          13 days ago

          Huh, what for? And if i would, maybe i should switch to pass (which is the same but in fancy and with plugins). I’m planning for years now to set up a little server i’ve built already…