• pdxfed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Hey, RIM/Blackberry’s CEO went to mobile world Congress in 2010, 3 solid YEARS after the iPhone launched, was dominating and defining the smartphone world and said, “we feel touchscreen is not the future of mobile phones” and rolled out another hybrid touch/keyboard model like the 5 they already had

      Blackberry was $150/share as of 2009 with the entire world in front of it. It’s now worth $3.59/share.

        • rottingleaf@lemmy.worldBanned
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          Their stuff was better, but disadvantaged by public perception. A perfect storm one can say.

          • Samskara@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Their stuff was significantly worse in user experience. Buttery smooth scrolling and highly reactive multi touch on a touch screen only device was revolutionary. Touch screens back then were known to be shitty to use. The competition to the iPhone were phones with tons of buttons, styluses and cumbersome user interfaces.

            All previous players in the smartphone market Blackberry, Nokia, Palm, Windows mobile were slow to adapt and failed.

            Palm’s webOS was competitive to iOS and in many ways superior. It failed because of mediocre hardware, bad carrier deals, and running out of money too quickly.

            Google‘s Android succeeded despite sucking until about version 4 by willpower and deep pockets from Google.

            The original introduction keynote for the iPhone was mindblowing back then.

            • rottingleaf@lemmy.worldBanned
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              with tons of buttons, styluses and cumbersome user interfaces.

              My dad had one. I liked that more. What you call cumbersome I call clean and sharp.

              While those rows of vaguely symbolic mildly nauseating icons we have now irritate, overload and suppress me.

              And back then I didn’t know that, but making Tcl/Tk programs for Windows Mobile of that time, for example, was as easy as for desktops.

              All previous players in the smartphone market Blackberry, Nokia, Palm, Windows mobile were slow to adapt and failed.

              Yes, that’s why Stephen Elop went from Microsoft to Nokia, buried Nokia’s relevant smartphone business, then went right back to Microsoft. Blackberry was too business-oriented, they should have marketed more universally.

              And they even dropped Maemo. Maemo didn’t have any of Symbian’s supposed “burning” traits. Nobody can persuade me a Linux+Qt based system is worse than iOS, especially of that time.

              Dunno about Palm then.

              Windows Mobile was Microsoft’s accidental good product, of course they decided to bury that as soon as they found an excuse.

              Let’s clarify this - I don’t consider iPhone anything good. Its success is a result of a cultist phenomenon which didn’t lead to anything good either. I agree about Android.

              But I can also see how that phenomenon happened, I myself looked in awe at anything Apple, just where I live it was and is considered luxury stuff. I also had this indoctrination from stupid books and articles about Stephen Jobs being some genius and Apple being a good company and the underdog. Had a children’s book about computers with the semi-transparent colored plastic iMac and classic MacOS screenshots, and had seen an ad about the lamp-shaped iMac G5, liked that aesthetic, wanted that. Used QuickTime browser plugin under Windows 2000, and my dad had an iPod. By the time I’ve seen a Mac IRL Apple’s aesthetic mutated into some ugly crap I didn’t like. I still feel that awe in what others do with software like Hotline and KDX and other things that originated on Macs. Apple had a huge emotional capital. Unfortunately, it went the way it went.

              • Samskara@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                Using TCL/Tk and Qt based apps on smartphones with a stylus was a pain in the butt in my experience.

                You probably mean Windows Phone, not mobile. Yes, Windows Phone 7 and 8 on Nokia phone were really compelling.

                Being able to scroll and zoom real websites smoothly on a phone, instead of having to use crappy WAP was huge.

                This meant lots of people were getting an iPhone as their first smartphone.

                The iPhone succeeded initially because of ease of use. Of course Apple‘s brand image played a role as well. When it came out it was 1000 US$, making it more expensive than other phones. So it instantly became a status symbol.

                Ease of use and status meant the executives of corporations started to demand their IT departments make the iPhone work with their Microsoft based networks and such.

                Later on Apple started supporting corporate features and mobile device management for corporations really well. Corporate IT loves iPhones because of the great management options, the limited range of models, and long support with software updates. Once Apple had a foot in corporate, their success became cemented.

      • iopq@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Intel thought the iPhone market was going to be too small so they didn’t agree to manufacture their CPUs

        • pdxfed@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          While also completely missing the boat on the potential of graphics cards and watching Nvidia and even AMD become massively more relevant in recent years.

    • InvertedParallax@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Microsoft has 1 massive disadvantage when it tries to enter new markets.

      It has to deal with brutal cutthroat competition from its worst enemy: Microsoft.

      Ms internal politics destroy almost all its successes, their politics are why theyve never really been a threat, for every skype there’s a teams which cuts them off at the knees lest it cost a division head their chance at a promotion.

  • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    I remember the “old” Skype, which was essential for keeping in touch with my siblings before we got cell phones. Once I got a phone, it was the end of Skype until ~2014 when I got a job where Skype for business was available. I still didn’t use it because that application would sometimes crash if you just jiggled the mouse. It became a running joke at my workplace.

    Clock into work, Skype crashed.

    Go to lunch, Skype crashed.

    Ran out of TP at home. You guessed it. Skype crashed.

  • VisionScout@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    skype was way ahead of his time. The quality was top notch. MS fucked by changing the architecture from decentralized to centralized in windows servers - this fucked up the calls quality and it created an opportunity window for whatsapp, viber, etc…

    MS turned skype to shit.

  • Stalinwolf@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Immigration Canada wanted proof of my wife and I’s relationship, so we dumped a packet of printed call logs on them as thick as a novel. Skype certainly served its purpose.

  • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Story of the times, have a good thing then break it so you can replace it with a shitier thing. Then have the competition eat your lunch by making a slightly less shitty thing.

    I found my physical “skipe” phone last week, dang it we could have had a bad bitch. But no, now we have fucking teams.

  • 9point6@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    MSN messenger died for Skype

    Skype died for Teams

    We’re not on a great trajectory here

    (Yes Lync too, but everyone was pleased about that)

  • GreenKnight23@lemmy.worldBanned from community
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    great, now do teams.

    nobody should have to use that ugly useless piece of shit for anything.

    • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      My company decided we don’t need phones and makes us use Teams for calls. Every day I think about murdering the person who made that decision.

      • GreenKnight23@lemmy.worldBanned from community
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Same here. I made my bed with it though.

        I have a “work phone”. it sits at my desk. I’ll answer it when I’m there, otherwise I don’t get called.

        I can’t (pronounced won’t) install any work shit on my personal phone because I run e/os and it isn’t compatible with their policies. 🤷 oopsies.

        fuck em. I’ve been giving them 4 hours a day for months now, after giving them over a decade of 15-18 hour days.