• anticurrent@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    8 hours ago

    The USA is in panic mode, they thought they could undermine China’s development just like they did with ball-sucking Europe, now there is a need for other nation to come up with their own models, and show the US they should stop underpinning monopolies.

  • Ghosthacked@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    20 hours ago

    These people will keep pushing and pushing. They know this is ridiculous, but if they flood the public with this bullshit, eventually the overton window shifts and people get brainwashed into thinking cult shit like this is good.

  • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Yes the ban on TikTok is working! We’re getting more and more freer!!! The kids will be saved!!! \s \s \s

  • Fedizen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 day ago

    Its open source lol. Why don’t the tech billionaires innovate? Instead they just ban competitors

    • Gsus4@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      turns out all that shit about open markets, free trade, competition was just while they had no competition to exploit it after WW2 left Europe and Asia devastated, now that China (with their own protectionism) is doing it better than the US…back to protectionism and fascism.

  • Katana314@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    66
    ·
    2 days ago

    This is astounding.

    I mean, not the Deepseek or jailing stuff. I mean a Senator actually proposing a law. I thought the way our government worked was, the annoying orange declares a vague uncited threat to be bad, and signs an executive order on it!

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      2 days ago

      No, we also allow mega corporations to submit bills that get rubber stamped by a rep somewhere. I don’t think a corporation would be so audacious as to submit this, so it’s a rare case of original content.

    • TheFriar@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      You overestimate the strength of the cognitive dissonance. These people have somehow found a way to overcome the concept of hypocrisy and the consequences for it. They’re impervious to shame and repercussions.

      This is them gathering their strength. The more we care about facts and honesty, the more they win. This is kind of the endgame

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      1 day ago

      Ex post facto laws are expressly prohibited in Article I, so they can’t pass a law criminalizing downloads from before the law was passed.

      They can, however, criminalize possessing a copy of DeepSeek. In that case you’d be legally required to delete it after the law passed.

      • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        They also can’t amend the constitution via executive order or deport US citizens, but watch them try it anyway

        • Cyrus Draegur@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Yup.

          “they can’t do that, that’s illegal!”

          Shame the law doesn’t mean Jack Fucking Shit now.

          The law is whatever they want it to be at any moment.

      • Simulation6@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Not sure about the laws wording, but if it is open source just create a branch with a different name.

  • Railcar8095@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    2 days ago

    Download the model and run locally is the most secure and privacy friendly way to use it.

    It’s absurd how little they know about what they are doing.

  • labbbb2@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    105
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Fascist regime and power/police abuse has started.

    P.S.: It seems like the US is becoming similar to Russia, kleptocratic country and organised crime in government.

  • hendrik@palaver.p3x.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    223
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Wow, bold choice to ban the import of technology and knowledge. Usually governments are worried about export, so it doesn’t fall into the wrong hands.

    Btw, how is the Nvidia stock price doing?

    • forrgott@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      57
      ·
      2 days ago

      Right? Like, seriously, we all know somebody is just butthurt because their stock options tanked.

      Oh, wait, I’m sorry! That was very unpatriotic of me, wasn’t it? I mean, we all know that winning an election guarantees being heavily rewarded with insider trading, right? It’s not like they’re there to represent constituents or anything; I mean, doesn’t everyone know we’re a republic, not a democracy?!

      Sigh…

    • Petter1@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      To be fair, this is common practice. Countries do this all the time to protect their economies. Mostly known in the West is China which banned many US services.

      Of course, security of the data of the citizens is also a factor. You don’t want foreign countries use this data to interfere in any way.

      • hendrik@palaver.p3x.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Honestly, I don’t think this is common practice in non-oppressive countries. I mean sure, this happens in North Korea, Iran, China… But I’m relatively free to consume what I want with a few minor exceptions. For example we don’t import food that isn’t food-safe by our standards. Regardless if it’s common practice to eat it in other places. Also food may not be able to enter the country due to laws on animal cruelty. Similar things apply to electronic devices that aren’t up to code. And some select few things are banned altogether and you can’t have them and neither can someone import them. Other than that, regulations aren’t super strict. I can use all American social media platforms despite them stealing my personal data and violating European privacy laws regularly, can use Russian or Chinese websites… I think I live in a free country.

        Helping domestic economy is done with tariffs / import tax. And not by banning things and putting people in jail.

        And mind that this isn’t about the service that collects your data and gives it to the Chinese government. This is about downloading the model file and using it all by yourself. So no data gets transferred to a foreign country. And it’s not because people could get harmed or anything. This is just because the vice president doesn’t want it personally. Like in some dictatorship. Otherwise they would have banned transferring data into foreign countries, if that’s what it’s about. But they didn’t do that, because it’s not about protecting the people.

        Or did I miss something and there are other examples for limitations on import?