This is why fact checks are bullshit. Reuters admits that

a WEF social media video from 2016 that stated eight predictions about the world in 2030, including: “You’ll own nothing. And you’ll be happy. What you want you’ll rent, and it’ll be delivered by drone.”

Now to make the statement false they bring in a strawman “Stated goal” condition and prove that particular part to be false, then claim that makes the whole thing false.

Such bullshit.

What I was fishing for. Thanks.

I vote John von Neumann for tech savant.

Yes, there are a lot of better things we could be spending the enormous military budget on.

I chose NASA because it’s the closest to military spending while still being peaceful.

The military budget is 36x bigger than NASA.

Mars could be the 51st state if the US were not so war hungry.

The cap of Bic pens!

Allows you to scoop and clean without the fear of going too deep (adults only).

Utopia (UK 2 season version)

https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL_jIDr2tZiuRHlp-bLwYNgWaFAp6dR7_Y

Chatgpt is decidedly unerotic in its responses.

Yog’Sothoth does his dark bidding on the internet.

i is at a right angle (pi/2) to 1 by definition.

My point is that particular drop is more likely to be seen as red than blue.

It all depends how you define a spot. Particularly the same spot test should be applied to both candidates.

but you’re not actually offering support.

You are offering support though, because you are adding to Trump’s popularity.

Not voting at all is just laziness.

Spoiled ballots may have some long term influence. But they have no power over the election being boycotted.

Except if you plant flowers. Bulbs taste awful.

Relevant

Certainly not. But choosing to punish at this precise opportunity would be like shooting your own feet.

Punish at the local level. Punish by supporting voting reform. Etc.

You have to think of the lack of primary as a sunk cost. The decision in front of you is independent of all previous decisions.

Fiddy.

Not too expensive.

And now … the Larch