• aeronmelon@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    The church in -1AD: “Jesus is a threat to our society! We have to do something about him.”

    The church in 1AD: “What an amazing person Jesus was, join us in singing songs about him.”

    It’s easy to praise a revolutionary mind after they’re no longer a threat to your status quo.

    • yeather@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      -1AD? So 1BC, which is before jesus was born? Do you mean ~33AD and ~34AD? Also, the church would not have been condemning Jesus as it was established after his death. You might be thinking of a Synagogue and pre-Christian Judaiism.

        • yeather@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Christians were heavily persecuted until around 312 with Emperor Constantine. Next time, if they want to say that, they should instead of saying it wrong in a roundabout way.

        • MBM@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          Still, you’d have to wait until ~300 AD for Christianity to become popular with the state

  • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Is this a joke?

    Say what you say about the community note system but here it delivers 🐸

  • Hideakikarate@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’m disappointed in the community note. You’d think they’d have learned the thing most high school seniors do/did. Don’t quote the Wikipedia article. Instead, quote the reference in the Wikipedia article. Much stronger of an argument.

    • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      2 days ago

      Wikipedia editor here; there’s some nuance. This article is listed as a Good Article, meaning it’s been reviewed by another (almost certainly) experienced editor for verifiability, prose and style, coverage, neutrality, stability, etc. This was attained in 2013, and especially for such a prominent article, slipping below those standards is a recipe to get GA status revoked. Presumably this note is summarizing a large portion of coverage by Wikipedia and thus a variety of sources. You want to read and cite all of the sources rather than Wikipedia in something like a research paper, but for just a community note, there’s really nothing wrong with this.

    • EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      2 days ago

      Also, his family doesn’t just believe that the FBI was involved in his death. They provided convincing enough evidence for a judge to rule in court that the US government was responsible for MLK’s death.