• borari@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    11 days ago

    Wait but like coke with regular sugar instead of hfcs isn’t gritty, nor does the sugar sink to the bottom.

    Is this a common thing? Stuff used sugar before hfcs and corn subsidies, and most people think shit tasted better that way, so now I’m confused as that’s not the case?

    • insomniac_lemon@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 days ago

      My assumption here is that sugar would need to be dissolved, mixed, and emulsified with more care/difficulty than hfcs. Though if there is any issue here it might not be present until a product has sat on the shelf (or in your house) for too long. Also for gritty, I was thinking more for something like ketchup or other sauces.

      I’m also not saying this is a fault of sugar itself, but that hfcs allows highly sweetened products to be produced more easily (which may present said issue if high sugar content is kept 1:1 despite no longer using hfcs).

      • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        11 days ago

        Mexican coke is already cane sugar. That just means the US gets the good shit too.

        God help rfk if this somehow results in Americans losing access to their sodies, though.

        • insomniac_lemon@lemmy.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 days ago

          A new YT video by a chemist (NY66qpMFOYo, go to 6:35) just came out highlighting that the acidity causes sucrose to invert into 50:50 glucose:fructose over time anyways, so it makes even less sense. And there’s more sodium.

          I like Isomaltulose (glucose-fructose with a stronger bond, making it metabolize slower) but it’s expensive and not as sweet. Though maybe other types of sweeteners could be used like this, perhaps in combination for a better flavor profile.