cross-posted from: https://slrpnk.net/post/15995282

Real unfortunate news for GrapheneOS users as Revolut has decided to ban the use of ‘non-google’ approved OSes. This is currently being posted about and updated by GrahpeneOS over at Bluesky for those who want to follow it more closely.

Edit: had to change the title, originally it said Uber too but I cannot find back to the source of ether that’s true or not…

  • HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    326
    ·
    edit-2
    13 days ago

    This makes me want to use GrapheneOS more. If the dataminers don’t want you to use it then it must be doing something right.

      • Realitaetsverlust@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        61
        ·
        12 days ago

        It’s only officially supported on google phones because sadly those are the only ones that are not modified to fuck which makes installing and supporting other OS’es way too much work.

        Giving google money once for a device is not a problem from a privacy or security standpoint.

        • Samsy@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          28
          ·
          12 days ago

          That’s correct, but not the reason grapheneOS chooses only pixel phones. It’s the level of hardware security features.

          • XTL@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            12 days ago

            Also unlockable and presumably has well working builds. It’s not just graphene, but just about every Android project it there that’s best supported on pixels. Other manufacturers have a crazy variety of locking schemes and required tools. Each one is a nightmare to support.

            • orange@communick.news
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              13
              ·
              12 days ago

              For GrapheneOS, it’s primarily that it’s re-lockable. That’s why other unlockable phones aren’t supported.

              The GrapheneOS install process sets new OS signing keys so you can lock the phone again and get full verified boot. However, most manufacturers haven’t implemented this feature.

              • fuzzzerd@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                12 days ago

                What do you get, app/feature wise for verified boot vs. Play integrity app? Does it increase the amount of apps that work on it?

                • orange@communick.news
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  8 days ago

                  No, Play Integrity intentionally checks if it’s a Google-approved key. Android itself has an API to check verified boot and gives info on the signing key - most devs just want to know verified boot is working.

                  I feel Play Integrity has a short life ahead of if competition authorities realise how exactly it works. “Anti-competitive” is the first thing policy-minded folks think when I explain the API to them.

                • lad@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  12 days ago

                  I would guess that it allows to detect tampering if you have to give your phone to the security officers and they do or don’t do something with it without you present. I heard of such occurrences on the border, but this happens in other places and countries, too. Not sure if locked bootloader would help, though

        • Irelephant@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          12 days ago

          In the EU almost every phone has an unlockable bootloader, there just isn’t any roms or custom recoveries for a lot of them.

        • HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          12 days ago

          Wish they’d at least support Fairphone.

          If Graphene reached out to them I bet Fairphone would even actively work with them to make it an official OS option.

    • m-p{3}@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      123
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 days ago

      On the other hand, it makes it easy to find which apps aren’t to be trusted with your data.

      • themurphy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        58
        ·
        13 days ago

        Also very obvious when an app or website have an US and an EU version. You just know they buttfuck the Americans because no rules.

        Even Apple had to make two versions of iOS.

    • dutchkimble@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      12 days ago

      Maybe graphene will find a way into duping those apps to think you have a regular android phone?

    • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 days ago

      Err, you could firewall an app from your data in Private Space or Shelter for older Android versions. That should work on any Android device.

  • AstralPath@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    93
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 days ago

    Fuck both of these companies. Never used McDicks app in the first place. Spyware bullshit.

    • Wilmo Bones@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      54
      ·
      13 days ago

      Right people who install various apps like McDonalds apps etc, are these even typical to GrapheneOS users? I’d think most would avoid superfluous data stealing apps.

      • HereIAm@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        12 days ago

        I’ve been thinking of switching the GrapheneOS. I certainly enjoy my privacy, and are taking steps to move to sources that don’t harvest my data. Outside of YouTube and android I’ve completely degoogled myself, even replaced Maps with magic earth and OsmAnd. I even swapped full time to linux a handful of months ago as a gamer with a VR interest. But I’m not so hardcore to not use any service that might sell my data. I still use vanilla firefox, food ordering apps, and discord for example. So while I’m not someone who goes to extreme lengths to protect my data, moving over to GrapheneOS doesn’t seem like a huge inconvenience compared to the gains you get.

    • Sips'@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      12 days ago

      Sorry but it seems I might have been mistaken by calling out Uber on this one. Thought i read about Uber during this but I cant find back to it. Have changed the title.

  • zako@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    72
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 days ago

    the problem here is not the banks or apps, the problem is Google Play Integrity API, which is supposed to enforce to run apps in secured phones and it is used to ban secured ROMs such as GrapheneOS and it allows to run apps on outdated phones without security patches.

    • kevincox@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      120
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      13 days ago

      which is supposed to enforce to run apps in secured phones

      The point of the Google Play Integrity API is to ensure that the user is not in control of their phone, but that one of a small number of megacorps are in control.

      Can the user pull their data out of apps? Not acceptable. Can the user access the app file itself? Not acceptable. Can the user modify apps? Not acceptable.

      Basically it ensures that the user has no control over their own computing.

      • umami_wasabi@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        edit-2
        13 days ago

        It’s simply the “secure” isn’t meant for users but the cooperations. Make it “secure” to their business.

        • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          12 days ago

          It’s used to help secure the businesses app yes. It helps with things like preventing resource abuse which would cost the company money. E.g. querying mass amounts of data on a loop to increase the companies bill.

      • zako@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        12 days ago

        If you install GrapheneOS, you do not need root, so GrapheneOS is in control of the phone not the user. The key here is if GrapheneOS is secure enough to be certified by Google Play Integrity API. is it security or other issue? perhaps Google is not supporter of FOSS ROMs, perhaps it is not fun of how GrapheneOS removes permissions to Google Apps, …

        If it is not security, this is a kind of monopoly to control which ROMs are allowed to run apps.

      • Anivia@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        12 days ago

        Can the user access the app file itself? Not acceptable

        This is possible on any Android phone, no root or custom rom required

  • Anivia@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    12 days ago

    Time to switch away from Auth I guess. Not even using GrapheneOS cause I have a Samsung phone, but this is not acceptable

  • penquin@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    13 days ago

    Webapps everything you can like I do with Firefox and ublock origin. Fuck these assholes.

  • BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    53
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    12 days ago

    OK McDonald’s, I will not use your most cost effective ordering method. I guess I will just have to order my 10 individually custom cheeseburgers at the counter instead. I might have to have e the order read back, and change my mind about a few burgers.

    • Railcar8095@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      109
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 days ago

      As a former employee… That does nothing. Crazies that spend 15 min to order some fries were common.

      If you go at rush hour it can be annoying to the employee and other customers, but at the end of the day nobody will remember and you would have spent 20 min and 10 dollars (which is 9 dollars material profit for MacDonald).

      Just. Don’t. Go. To. Macdonald’s.

    • purplemonkeymad@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      12 days ago

      I don’t know about other places but they haven’t had a counter for years round here. They have big screens that you go up to to order and pay, then you get a number and pick it up when called. Even if you wanted to do this, no one is going to listen to you trying to order at the kitchen.

      • boonhet@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        12 days ago

        Entirely different country, but they still have a counter in addition to the screens; the counter is for when you want to pay cash

    • bountygiver [any]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      12 days ago

      that’s just screwing with the workers though, and the workers sure as hell is not going to get paid extra for your custom order

      • Woht24@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        12 days ago

        This viewpoint is so stupid.

        The cashier is paid to take orders, whether they take 1 long obnoxious order or 3 small orders, it’s the same shit.

        People are so swept up in ‘kindness and support’ (internet circlejerking), they think that the fact you inconvenienced some 17 year old, representing a massive corporation, as a fuck you to the company that employs them, you’ve committed some moral sin against your fellow man.

        • neomachino@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          12 days ago

          That worker doesn’t want to be there, that’s likely one of 3 jobs they need to barely scrape by.

          You holding them up from doing other tasks they need to do to keep a job that barely feeds them is doing nothing but making their day a little harder. It affects the company 0%. The company is faceless and doesn’t care how much you abuse the worker bees as long as they get your money.

          I don’t know what the answer is aside from not patronizing the company at all, but I know that’s not it.

          • Lag@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            12 days ago

            If the company is always too busy, they will need to hire more workers or the existing ones will leave.

            • neomachino@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              12 days ago

              I highly doubt it, if the store is too busy they’ll likely either do nothing because why would they or if it’s really bad add some robots who can handle the workload so they can get rid of those pesky employees.

              In the past few years almost all of the fast food places in the closest plaza to me have been working on a skeleton crew. Lines wrapped around the building, 2 miserable employees, upset customers, but the money is still coming in.

              Most people can’t just leave their job, even a days wage can crush a lot of people.

          • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            12 days ago

            The company is faceless and doesn’t care how much you abuse the worker bees as long as they get your money.

            Hey now, sometimes the company employs security that’s extremely bored, incredibly racist, and looking for a low income punching bag to hassle.

            • neomachino@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              12 days ago

              Ahh how could I forget about the bored, racist, wannabe cops with nothing better to do. The perfect face to any modern company.

        • GHiLA@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          12 days ago

          the cashier

          Who is also the manager, making drinks, doing the fries because that bitch called in sick…

            • PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              11 days ago

              depends on the situation. otherwise good employee who rarely if ever is sick and works hard calls in about being unable to work? absolutely fine

              Person who i know knows exactly how many days a year over how many periods of absence it will take before HR get involved using it as a second pool of paid holiday days and leaving us high and dry to deal with the things she’s paid to help the team with then yeah, bitch

              her name was karen too…

              • Dragon Rider (drag)@lemmy.nz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                11 days ago

                Person who i know knows exactly how many days a year over how many periods of absence it will take before HR get involved using it as a second pool of paid holiday days

                This is a dick move if you don’t tell your coworkers how to exploit the loophole too, and a heroic act if you do.

  • AlecSadler@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    12 days ago

    This surprises me because McDonald’s app is hands down the worst app I’ve ever encountered in the history of all Android apps.

    It’s is sluggish, ignores touches/taps half the time, doesn’t adhere to Android best practices for flow, crashes a lot, errors a lot, etc.

    But OK McDonald’s. Fuck off.

    • ililiililiililiilili@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      12 days ago

      I can add that it requires location permission (even when you attempt to search manually with zip or city). What a shitty, dystopian timeline we are experiencing when we’re mandated to run privacy invasive spyware, just to get a fucking discount on nugs.

  • HiramFromTheChi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    edit-2
    12 days ago

    I can’t prove it, but I’m 99% sure Lyft did the same thing. Had a perfect rating (and was even a driver at one point), and they banned me without explanation right after I switched to GrapheneOS.

    Emailed them a few times asking for the reason, and they refused to tell me.

    _"Legally, we cannot release any additional information except that we found your account to be violating our Terms of Service.

    We will be in touch if we are able to reopen your account in the future."_

    There’s absolutely nothing else that they could’ve misconstrued as “violating the Terms of Service.”

    If Uber’s going down the same path, no more ride-sharing for me I guess. ¯_(ツ)_/¯

    • kalpol@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      13 days ago

      Uber still works under Lineage. Can’t imagine what the heck they are trying to block

    • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      12 days ago

      There’s no reason a company couldn’t release the info legally unless it was under something like AML (anti money laundering) laws and you were flagged as a criminal. They legally can’t disclose why in that case.

      Using a different OS isn’t reason enough, if they were telling the truth about the legal restrictions.

    • UntitledQuitting@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      13 days ago

      Do the web apps not still work? I’ve booked Uber eats from a computer in the past, I’m imaging the phone browser version might still function. I don’t have lyft in my country to know tho.

      • HiramFromTheChi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 days ago

        I’ll have to try next time and report back. Honestly don’t use ride sharing too often. I prefer public transport.