Summary

Senate GOP leader Mitch McConnell reportedly warned that there will be no recess appointments, directly opposing Donald Trump’s plan to bypass Senate confirmation for controversial cabinet nominees, including Matt Gaetz.

Gaetz has faced allegations of drug use and sexual misconduct.

McConnell’s stance sparked widespread discussion about a looming constitutional showdown.

Critics argue recess appointments could undermine Senate authority and pose national security risks.

Observers question McConnell’s influence, noting potential leadership changes, while others see this as a critical test of Senate integrity against Trump-aligned Republicans.

  • Rapidcreek@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    7 hours ago

    The Senate can’t turn down too many Trump appointees until they are looked on as an obstruction to their own party. So, you’ll definitely lose Gaetz, but Trump has flooded the zone with incompetence.

    • Catma@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I am starting to believe the theory Trump is putting up the worst possible people so when one gets rejected he can try to force Congress to adjourn and then appoint whomever he wants which will be 100% worse.

      Not that Trump thought of this but someone, Miller, is pulling the strings

      • Rapidcreek@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        56 minutes ago

        Senators are very different in many ways. They are very powerful, and feel a responsibility to their position for the most part. That includes advise and consent, part of the Constitution. It takes just as many Republican votes to call a recess as to confirm a nominee. Don’t forget, also, that until DeWine and DeSantis do their bit, they will be two votes short.

      • Billiam@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        As shit as Roberts’ SCOTUS is, I don’t think even they’d go that far. Their entire argument hinges on one phrase from Article Two:

        he may, on extraordinary Occasions, convene both Houses, or either of them, and in Case of Disagreement between them, with Respect to the Time of Adjournment, he may adjourn them to such Time as he shall think proper;

        Supposedly as long as neither the House nor the Senate alter their scheduled appointment dates this clause can’t be invoked.

      • BassTurd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        It’s negotiating 101. Open with the hoop dream so the next option isn’t near as bad. If you get your first option, you win, and if you get the second option, you win a little less.

    • ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Yup, Gaetz and (if the GOP does the minimum of trying to protect this country) Gabbard are the sacrificial lambs to get through Hegseth, RFK and already too many others to count.

    • Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Donnie boy is always testing the waters, testing the limits. It’s an extreme version of what the GOPers have been doing for years. Ask for a 150% of what’s reasonable, and then act all butt hurt when they only get 125%. We’ve seen this game before. There’s nothing new coming out of the “grand” Old party. smh.

        • Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 hours ago

          If so then the Dems need to learn some basic negotiation skills. But I don’t agree. The two parties are supposed to represent all of the US, and what they should be negotiating for is those policies that are in the best interest of all US citizens. I hope you’ll agree that is not the case.

          • whithom@discuss.online
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 hour ago

            Very few things the federal government does has anything to do with helping people. It’s bowing to our corporate masters while trying to keep the masses from rioting