Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agoGit good, sonslrpnk.netexternal-linkmessage-square175fedilinkarrow-up11.24Karrow-down146
arrow-up11.19Karrow-down1external-linkGit good, sonslrpnk.netTrack_Shovel@slrpnk.net to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square175fedilink
minus-squareatro_city@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down20·2 days agoYou’re an average USAmerican, aren’t you?
minus-squareinv3r510n@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up7arrow-down2·1 day agoPretty sure calling women “females” is given the side eye in every English dialect.
minus-squareatro_city@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·22 hours agoMales, females. What’s wrong with that?
minus-squareatro_city@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down2·17 hours agoThat’s quite subjective. I’m pretty sure when I say “I talked to the male around the corner” people won’t start assuming I talked to a dog, pigeon, or snake.
minus-squareFelixCress@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down2·edit-21 day agoIt is called USian. Often, but not always, goes with a red hat and multiple flags.
You’re an average USAmerican, aren’t you?
Pretty sure calling women “females” is given the side eye in every English dialect.
Males, females. What’s wrong with that?
It’s dehumanizing.
That’s quite subjective. I’m pretty sure when I say “I talked to the male around the corner” people won’t start assuming I talked to a dog, pigeon, or snake.
It is called USian. Often, but not always, goes with a red hat and multiple flags.