Betty Sue makes $286,000 per month on Etsy. She started with nothing, and now she’s filthy rich.

Come on, man. The chances of that happening to the average person are close to zero. Stories like this give people unrealistic expectations.

  • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    102
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Gotta keep the American dream alive.

    Give people hope.

    People with hope don’t revolt because they still have something to lose.

  • FireTower@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    1 month ago

    The chances of that happening to the average person are close to zero.

    That’s the whole point. People don’t watch the news to hear “dog bites man” they watch it to hear “man bites dog”.

    No one wants to watch a 2-3 hr long movie about someone’s regular Tuesday at the office they want to watch something that doesn’t happen everyday like an adventure, the perfect couple meeting, or the world ending.

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    1 month ago

    To pacify you by convincing you that you could be next, as opposed to you are regularly fucked by the rich.

  • Electric_Druid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    People are more likely to accept an inherently flawed economic system if they thing they have any chance of “beating” it. Stories like this, although actually very rare, help reinforce that narrative.

    • MrMcGasion@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      I have had someone tell me that they’d rather live in an economic system “like we have in America” where people have a chance at rags to riches, than a system “like Germany, where the social safety net means the average person doesn’t have a chance at making it big.”

      If anyone ever tells you wealthy people are intelligent, don’t believe them.

    • aesthelete@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Yep, many also think they’re exceptional, and so they’ve convinced themselves they’ll be the exception.

  • ShareMySims@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 month ago

    Capitalist propaganda.

    “Aspiration” to be more precise, it’s one of the ways capitalists convince large segments of the public that they’re temporarily embarrassed millionaires, who just need to pull their bootstraps up hard enough, and they will make it, like the people in the programme did (conveniently they never address things like racism, sexism, queerphobia, ableism, and other barriers that many people have to face just to survive, never mind thrive, and the fact that all of these barriers are artificial and created by people who benefit just as much from dividing society up and pitting us against each other, as they do from selling us rags-to-riches bullshit to get us to work harder to make them money).

    • Kintarian@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      I’ve never understood “pull yourself up by your bootstraps,” which is impossible. No matter how hard you pull, you can’t, say, jump a fence. The rich are inadvertently telling poor people that becoming rich by working hard is impossible.

      • ShareMySims@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 month ago

        I think that’s the point, just like with “a few bad apples”, the original intent of the saying has been subverted to help those in power keep the rest of us down (if you just do this impossible thing, you’ll be just like us! Why don’t you just do that impossible thing already, you useless lazy bastard? And so on. It’s part cognitive dissonance to make themselves feel like they’re “self made”, part gaslighting convincing us we’re just not trying hard enough).

  • 2ugly2live@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    Gotta keep that dream alive. Besides, why would I want to tax the rich when I’m this close to being rich myself! /s

  • hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 month ago

    First of all, the vast majority of media cares only about crafting and publishing stories that people want to read, instead of stories that people should read. Think about clickbait articles. Their purpose is to get people to read the story and therefore give them money (either by seeing ads, buying a physical magazine/newspaper, or signing up for a paid subscription), as oppised to actually informing the public about things they should know

    Second, capitalism needs the working class to think that they can get rich too if they just work hard, and thus people spend their lives working because they’ve been told that they can get rich. Allow me to illustrate:

  • ContrarianTrail@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    Isn’t that the case with all news? When a self-driving car kills a person it’s newsworthy but the million times it doesn’t is not. By definition the event needs to be something out of the ordinary for it to spark the interest of most people.

    • Kintarian@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 month ago

      They use sensationalism to make things sound worse than they are.

      They selectively report information, leaving out details that don’t fit their agenda.

      They use misleading headlines, knowing that people often only read the headlines. They use words like “horrifying,” “catastrophic,” and “viral.”

      They manipulate charts, graphs, statistics, and photographs.

      Balanced reporting isn’t balanced if it pits a scientist against a conspiracy theorist.

    • deafboy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yes, reporting on a success of an individual is practically the same thing as openning the gas valve… Jesus F. Christ !

      • GodlessCommie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        It’s the bullshit of hard work will result in success and money. The bullshit propaganda of ‘built out of their garbage’ its so easy anyone can do it, if only you work hard enough. And if you are not a successful independently wealthy individual you didn’t work hard enough and you are to blame, not the system that’s designed to keep large segments of society poor for the benefit of the rich.

        • deafboy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          It’s the bullshit of hard work will result in success and money.

          That’s funny, because it’s not the liberal leaning folks who glorify the hard labor.

            • deafboy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              Communists and fascist are the conservatives on my side of the planet though. They both appeal on “the good old times, when the world was right”. Both equally glorify physical labor and fight against the intellectualism.

  • OpenStars@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 month ago

    For-profit media sells whatever makes them the highest profits. (Those who won’t, make way to those who will, or remain in obscurity e.g. how many people have even heard of Ian Danskin of Innuendo Studios.)

    They will sell anything it seems, with little to no regard for facts. Then they leave it to you to determine the lies of omission, while hunting for the real truth, i.e. to do the true work of journalism. But usually unpaid, painstakingly, and again you’ll never be able to share that message by virtue of being in conflict with the for-profit sources. Or if you do, who would even understand you, especially among the sheeple who either cannot and/or also will not bother to read anything at all.

    Some people like Jon Stewart have railed against this for decades… but he lost, and it’s worse than ever before. Adjust your expectations accordingly. This is the world.

    • Kintarian@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      Massive corporations own the media along with the likes of Rupert Murdoch. If you don’t dig deeper, you will only believe what they want you to believe. The talking heads on TV are not journalists; they are paid actors reading whatever they are paid to read. Modern news is entertainment no better than the National Enquirer.

      • OpenStars@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        Exactly that. Which ironically doesn’t mean that everything that they say is false… but it does mean that everything that they say is suspect.

        We need a billionaire to swoop in an save us. Which won’t happen, so we need a grass roots effort from the ground up to save us. Which won’t happen so we need a spaghett monster or god to save us. Which won’t happen bc e.g. the Christian God allows free will hence consequences… so we need aliens to save us. Which won’t happen bc they do not exist - that we can demonstrate.

        It is a lot easier to destroy than to create, and it will require enormous efforts to maintain constant vigilance to know things in the future, in this our mis- and worse yet dis-information era.