• kescusay@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    That’s the fucking POINT. We don’t have a great democracy. We want one, but we’re currently fucked by the undemocratic electoral college, a system specifically designed to winnow our choices down to two.

    So your options are a member of a rather pedestrian centrist party, or a deranged and demented monster.

    If you’re not American, as implied by your comment, then you may be used to functional democratic systems. Well, we’re currently stuck with what we’ve got. So as an outsider looking in, who do you want in charge of the world’s largest military? Harris or Trump? Pick one.

    • escapesamsara@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      24
      ·
      2 months ago

      No citizenry is ever stuck, at any point with the government they have. That was the entire, exclusive positive lesson to learn from the american experiment.

      • skulblaka@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        And “the American experiment” took place in a world that didn’t contain mass surveillance systems, automatic firearms, remote control attack drones, EMPs, radar trackers, and god knows what other military secrets that can be brought to bear. A second American revolution is guaranteed to be extremely bloody, has a much lower chance of success than the first one, and nobody wants to be on the first wave of it.

        Besides, the stakes are different now. The American Revolution succeeded largely on the back of the fact that the rebels in question were all the way across the ocean and not taking land from Britain directly. That’s no longer an option.

        I see the point you’re trying to make here but you’re ignoring an awful lot of context both for the original American Revolution and also for the modern day.

        • escapesamsara@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          2 months ago

          No, I wrote american experiment. The concept of america itself is rotten and worthless, except the idea that citizens control their government, not the other way around. If we abandon the only good lesson that america has given the world then the hundreds of millions of people the us has tortured, murdered and oppressed were hurt for absolutely no reason.

    • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      29
      ·
      2 months ago

      Democrats aren’t centrist, they’re right-wing. Harris is talking about making the most lethal military in the world, cracking down on asylum seekers at the border,.and giving unlimited support for genocide. Under Biden the number of people killed by police went up every single year and under Harris that trend will only continue.

      If you want democracy you need to think outside the ballot box, because elections in the US are fucked and both parties are in on it.

          • kescusay@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Define “direct action.” I asked for specificity. Don’t dance around what you mean, say it clearly.

          • webadict@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            That is only one of the actions. Voting is harm reduction, and done in tandem with other actions.

              • webadict@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                And yet, letting Trump be president is doing that genocide faster and harsher, stripping women, minorities, and LGBT people of rights, AND MORE!

                • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  9
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  If you’ve been paying attention to the daily horrors coming out of Gaza, they’re already on track to total extermination.

                  The only hope for Gaza is if the US/Israel is defeated. Who do you think is more likely to fuck this up and cause a US/Israel loss?

                  It’s called revolutionary defeatism.

                  • webadict@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    8
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    It’s called Accelerationism, and it tends to work out exceptionally poorly for vulnerable groups, and it also has a significant chance to fail.

                    So, your goal to fight genocide with more genocide seems to have a fatal flaw.

        • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          13
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          I think we should be working to organize the anti-genocide caucus of Democrats away from the Party and form a revolutionary party that can challenge the two right-wing parties for power. I think we can do this within the unions too, the rank and file are much more radical on this issue than the leadership. There’s a huge political movement right under our feet.

          • kescusay@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            15
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Ah, so just divide the Democrats up to destroy their power. Typical.

            I know I’m not going to convince you, so this is for everyone else reading this thread. Because of our shitty electoral college and FPTP system, calls for third parties on the left translate into more political power for the right. Here’s how it works…

            Let’s say you have two main political parties, the Snuggling Puppies party and the Kicking Puppies party. The Snugglers usually win, because the Kickers are violent weirdos.

            Then the Kickers get the bright idea of helping out fringe parties that also love puppies, like one called the Worshipping Puppies party, which takes their love of puppies to the extreme. They secretly fund and promote these other parties, and it’s very effective. In the next election, it’s so effective that the Kickers win.

            Wait, what? How? It’s simple. With the people who love puppies dividing their votes between multiple candidates who love puppies, the Kickers get a plurality.

            Let’s keep it simple and say the Kickers clandestinely supported three parties that are ideologically opposed to them, meaning people who love puppies divided their votes up four ways. Each of the puppy-loving parties gets 19.5% of the vote, for a pro-puppy total of 78%! But the Kickers didn’t divide up their vote, so with a 22% plurality, the winner is… The party that everyone else hates!

            It’s a classic divide and conquer strategy. It only works when astroturfers manage to convince people on the left puppy lovers to divide themselves up, rather than consolidate to fight back against the right people who hate puppies.

            • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              12
              ·
              2 months ago

              Cute story.

              My goal is to destroy and replace the Democratic Party. If there can only be two parties then let’s build a revolutionary party and replace the useless liberal party.

              • kescusay@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                14
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                Cute story.

                True story. If you dispute it, you dispute math. It’s literally how FPTP voting works.

                Your goal is a permanent Republican majority. Might as well start openly rooting for Trump.

              • nomous@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                10
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                My goal is to destroy and replace the Democratic Party

                With what? I doubt even 15% of the voting public agree with any of your ideas.

                If there can only be two parties then let’s build a revolutionary party and replace the useless liberal party.

                In what world does destroying the further left, liberal party do anything except create a power vacuum for the right to fill?

                This is why nobody takes you seriously, you don’t even have thought out plans, just “burn it all down and magically good people who agree with me will rise up and seize power” You’re delusional and completely disconnected from reality, go read more theory and let the adults handle things.

              • webadict@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 months ago

                You could have a goal to destroy and replace the Republican party instead, no? Seems like it’d be an overall better solution to be, shifting all parties further to the left, especially if you consider the Democractic party too far right. I mean, why keep the reactionary party?

          • mycodesucks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            None of that is incompatible or inconsistent with a Harris victory. If this is your expressed goal and desired outcome, it is MUCH easier to do under Harris than under Trump where any action you take is more or less guaranteed to be met with responses from any number of empowered supremacist groups.

            Also, I only EVER hear these revolutionary ideas and pushes during the last 6 months before an election when people proudly virtue signal about their intent not to vote for the Democrat. Just like with third parties, where is all of this political will and activity during the off-years when there’s time to actually BUILD a grassroots movement?

            I’m with you. Our choices suck. The time to start doing something about that is November 6th, after the election is won and a backslide has been prevented. Build out a movement and come back in 2028 with a platform, a base, and a candidate.

            • kescusay@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              The person you’re arguing with has admitted that they want to destroy the Democratic party elsewhere in this thread, with the bizarrely naive belief that somehow this wouldn’t result in permanent Republican control.

            • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              10
              ·
              2 months ago

              Under a Democratic president everyone just stays home and hopes things get better. It was only under Trump that we had the largest protest movement in US history.

              And this is despite the fact that police killings have only gotten worse under Biden. I need to be clear, I am not an accelerationist. Conditions get worse no matter who the president is, but it’s only when liberals are out of power that they can be convinced towards revolutionary goals.

              • mycodesucks@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                Perhaps, but that motivation is only useful when it can be translated into political action - not creating an untrained army to be fed directly into fascist prisons and police brutality meat grinders.

                You might be creating more revolutionaries under a conservofascist administration, but in practice it’s just doing this:

                Edit: You don’t even need to look far into the past to see that this doesn’t work. Look at Hong Kong. The city’s leadership swung to fascism, and your prediction came true. Some of the biggest protests in the history of the city by some of the most motivated demonstrators… followed by a brutal crackdown, arrest, exile, and now fascist control of the city is more or less guaranteed for generations. The population is no longer CAPABLE of mounting ANY kind of resistance. Yes, Hong Kong had its fascism forced on it rather than choosing it at the ballot box, but the result will be the same. Fascism doesn’t care how it gets its power.

      • Fedizen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        I don’t think equivacotion is realistic here. The GOP is actively hostile to democracy while the dems are just ambivalent to it.