• 4lan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    that is such a grimy way to hunt lol. basically poisoning without the risk eating the meat

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s the arctic and a polar bear. Is it fair? Well it’s about as fair as fishing. And if they don’t do either they’ll see how fair starving on a block of ice is

      • 4lan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        Maybe people shouldn’t be living there if they can’t survive without poisoning their prey

          • 4lan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            The same reason people shouldn’t be living in Arizona and expecting other states to divert their water to them. There is no water there you shouldn’t live there. No one is forcing anyone to live there

            Just live in a habitable climate there are so many. Just live in a biome with plentiful game, there are many

            • Ashelyn@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              The Inuit/Eskimos are some of the more self-sustaining peoples on the planet. They don’t depend much on imports from elsewhere, at least not to my knowledge. They had to figure out many adaptations for the area but they make it work and have done so for a long time.

              To compare them with a city representing the pinnacle of mankind’s hubris is a bit of a reach imo