Why YSK: many countries have issues with weight, such as mine with 74% of US adults being overweight or obese. The global weight loss industry is over $200 billion yearly, with many influencers, pills, and surgeries promising quick results with little effort. These often come with side effects, or don’t work long term.

Studies suggest filling yourself with foods low in caloric density and high in fiber, like fruits and vegetables, can help reach and maintain a healthy weight. It’s good to have these foods available in our living spaces to make the choice easy. Your taste buds will likely adapt to love them if you’re not there yet.

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    3 months ago

    You’re saying people should just deal with hunger and fight against everything evolution wants, instead of just eating high fiber food and not being hungry…

    How is that “better”?

    • pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Evolution’s impact on our hunger was driven by scarcity. Most humans don’t experience the levels of scarcity that drove that evolution.

      So, yes, you should work against evolution. This is true for a lot of aspects of the human condition.

      • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Except, and this is what I think they were saying, your body is wired to demand food even if it doesn’t strictly need it. You can’t win that battle long term.

        Instead you work with your dumb meat sack and eat healthy foods that keep you from feeling hungry for a longer time.

        If your diet strategy involves almost everyone who tries it failing, and those who succeed almost always have their progress backslide in a few years, then maybe the problem is with the strategy rather than an intrinsic character flaw in the people trying it.

    • Zorque@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      Evolution isn’t divine, it’s random mutation that generally benefits it’s current environment. Considering most of our evolutionary traits emerged thousands, if not millions, of years ago… I’d say we can safely conclude that a lot of our evolutionary instincts aren’t especially relevant to our current circumstances.

      • thejoker954@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        The eating issue is less evolution and more societal.

        Society is the one who says we should eat 3 meals a day, not evolution.

        Evolution would rather we ate more often throughout the day.

        Think of it like a gas tank. Currently people fill it up and wait for it to get empty before filling up again.

        When the reality is its better to always keep a half a tank for emergencies.

        • Zorque@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 months ago

          Evolution would rather we eat as much as possible, cause who knows when our next meal will be.