• BarrierWithAshes@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    Guy dies in Disneyland. Family sues. Disney lawyers say he can’t sue since guy-that-died had subscribed to Disney+ before and agreed to the terms of service. The terms of service he probably scrolled by when he registered say “you can’t sue us”. That was the most recent move I’ve heard.

    That’s an insane oversimplification of the proceedings but it appears like it’s gonna come down to this clause. The clause that the user signs upon registering to Disney+ is a binding arbitration clause. You can read more about that here: https://www.investopedia.com/terms/m/mandatory-binding-arbitration.asp

    Basically says you waive your right to sue us. Ianal btw. Also Discord has this same clause in their terms of service.

    • snooggums@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      The clause that the user signs upon registering to Disney+ is a binding arbitration clause.

      Disney is taking it waaaay further than anyone else by saying a free trial to D+ means any legal interaction with Disney goes to arbitration, not just for D+.

      Arbitration clauses in EULAs are bullshit anyway, but if this isn’t thrown out of court in a way that kills the concept of being able to sue for damages when every business adds this clause.

    • Norah - She/They@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 month ago

      It was a woman that died I believe, and it’s her husband suing. It was him that signed up for the trial though, not the wife. The death was also caused by anaphylaxis, after the couple repeatedly checked in about the allergy being accommodated and were assured it would be.

    • Fonzie!@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      AYO how is that legal? What some random commercial company made up can’t be above the law, right?