• Neato@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    93
    arrow-down
    21
    ·
    6 months ago

    Outcompeting by having a nation subsidize the cost. Until local manufacturers go out of business because they can’t compete. Then China owns the entire industry she jacks to the price.

    It’s like no one has been paying attention.

    • mlg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      Local manufacturers

      You mean Ford, GM, and Chrysler who make useless pieces of garbage and also outsource production to Mexico?

      Who also got bailed out by the federal government for going bankrupt back in 2009?

      • shikitohno@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        6 months ago

        GM, who just announced a $6 billion stock buy back once they knew tariffs would keep them safe from having to compete with Chinese EVs, that GM?

        This sort of stuff is realistically why I have no sympathy for the major US automotive manufacturers. The only reason I don’t just say “Screw them, let Chinese EVs drive them out of business,” is because it would put so many people out of work in their plants who have no role in these decisions. Barring some fantasy where the Chinese companies establish US plants and offer equivalent or better union contracts for current employees at GM, Ford and Chrysler, these companies should simply be bound hand and foot in terms and conditions whenever something is done by the government to help them. Like, make those protectionist tariffs conditional on them hitting investment targets in relevant technologies, raising worker pay and benefits, reducing cost to the customer and a ban on stock buybacks for the duration of the tariffs being valid.

        • mlg@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          If they were barely a blip, they wouldn’t have been bailed out for 17.4 50 billion dollars.

          • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            6 months ago

            Perhaps “barely a blip” wasn’t the most accurate phrasing but they’re not exactly crushing the competition. GM is at 16.5% while Toyota is #2 (14.4%), Ford #3 and Hyundai is #4. Stellantis isn’t even a US company so I don’t know why people still think of Dodge/Chrysler/Jeep as American brands. The whole market is pretty mixed and these tariffs on Chinese vehicles are protecting the market not US companies.

            https://finance.yahoo.com/news/teslas-us-market-share-now-tops-volkswagen-subaru-and-bmw-161055575.html

            The bailouts were given to save US manufacturing jobs and all these companies besides Ford have fully paid back those loans.

    • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      6 months ago

      I mean the US is also doing that. It’s not a subsidies issue; it’s the fact that Chinese companies are using subsidies to actually make things while US companies are just pocketing them.

      • Neato@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        Is the US? What us car company is doing it to such a degree name countries are blocking their goods?

        • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          I mean nobody is blocking US goods, but the subsidies are definitely a thing. Also why would China even block US EVs when they’re uncontestedly winning that market?

      • CeeBee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        arrow-down
        19
        ·
        6 months ago

        You’re introducing an argument as a way to undermine the viewpoint that’s opposite to yours.

        No one said it’s fine “when we do it”. That’s not the point being discussed.

        The other bigger issue here is that these new cars are coming from a region that has a horrendous track record for safety and quality. EVs when done right are still a considerable risk with battery fires, but the ones manufactured in China are much worse for quality and safety. In the next few years, as these cars flood markets around the world, it will be a massive issue.

    • nekandro@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      6 months ago

      Lmao there’s a guy who usually posts a long response to these “subsidies” claims bullshit, but I think they got into a pissing match with a mod in the comments and got banned lmao.

      Jist of it is: China’s subsidies are negligible compared to the US, and what they’ve actually done is created a competitive domestic market with a large number of players. Unless you think Chinese people are all puppets, even if China (as a country) owns the industry it would not prevent internal competition that drives down prices. Moreover, China does not offer per-unit subsidies on export. In fact, Chinese EVs exported to Europe are something like 40% more expensive than domestically for the same model.

    • windie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      6 months ago

      Tesla has been subsidized by years. The difference is china delivers and in America an asshole get rich.