“Gen Z simply uses technology more than any other generation and is therefore more likely to be scammed via that technology.”

Misleidende titel van de NOS. Het is geen verhoging, het is een terugkeer naar het oorspronkelijke tarief.

raid is essential anyway

Why? If there are offsite backups that can be restored in an acceptable time frame, what’s still the point of RAID?

It seems like this order is rather limited and the IA can continue almost all of their work.

“A brief search showed that the applicant gave false statements in their VISA application form, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §1546. Lifetime ban applied.”

Unit tests or integration tests?

If you turn the fan up high enough it will blow the heat from outside into the house. Trust me, I’m a scientists.

Hey look, shoe is peddling 4chan talking points again

GDPR enforcement is left to the member states. The EDPB isn’t an agency, its more like all the national data protection authorities in a trench coat.

Some national authorities allow it, most don’t. The final word will be from the CJEU or the EDPB.

Why not?

What about the centuries of imperialism here and there

Applying AI-voodoo to a non-existing problem with unknown side effects? Sign me up!

It’s not. Image hosting sites have existed for decades. Websites are not liable unless they have actual knowledge of illegal content and ignore takedown requests. Stop fearmongering.

Good. Hopefully this will discourage people from using Clownflare’s DNS.

In case you don’t know, Cloudflare already controls a massive amount of websites, have access to their unencrypted traffic and are making the web inaccessible for people who use tor or noscript. They are a threat to the open web.

Because people are blowing this way out of proportion. Users uploading illegal content is always part of hosting a platform and lawmakers realized this decades ago. Platform hosters legally cannot be held liable for the content of their users unless they have actual knowledge of specific instances of illegal content. This is both in the US (section 230 of the Communications Decency Act) and the EU (chapter II of the Digital Services Act, previously the eCommerce directive)

I don’t want to get into the mess of the government defining what is or isn’t against the law

What does that even mean

Tbf Max would have pushed no matter what the team told him.

Have you ever seen the statistics? The DPAs are massively underfunded and the Irish DPC in particular is notorious for ignoring complaints, to the point where the EU is considering launching infringement procedures against Ireland for not properly enforcing the GDPR. If you think they will take action on a complaint like this, you will get disappointed.

On the other hand, petitioning the courts to intervene is probably easier than you think. In some member states you don’t even need a lawyer, so all it takes is a bit of time and some court fees. I’m not saying it’s the preferred option, but realistically it is the shortest path to a result.